Tuesday, June 22, 2021

If congressional Democrats can't act to save democracy now, they don't deserve recess

WASHINGTON, DC - JUNE 14: (L-R) U.S. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) talks with Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) after members of Congress held a moment of silence for the 600,000 American lives lost to COVID-19, on the steps of the U.S. Capitol on June 14, 2021. The rate of severe illness and death continues to drop as more Americans get vaccinated. (Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images)
Schumer and Pelosi have a lot to clear off their plates. The sooner the better.

The schedules set up by Congress last December—with the pandemic still raging and the Senate majority undecided pending the special election in Georgia—are proving unworkable just six months later. Something's gotta give, and that something is the ridiculous amount of recess they've currently got scheduled over the next three months.

As the calendar now stands, the House is scheduled to be in session for just nine days from July 2 through September 19. Nine. The Senate is now scheduled to leave Thursday for a 10-day July 4 recess, and then to be out starting August 6 until September 13. That leaves them about 16 days for legislative work between the end of this week and a whole lot of critical deadlines tied to the end of the fiscal year on September 30. When you throw in all of the Mondays and Fridays that are on the legislative schedule but no floor work is actually done because they're travel days for members, well, even congressional leaders are thinking they have to do something.

That means getting members prepared for having less time in recess. House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer is softening them up. "House Democrats are committed to advancing President Biden’s ambitious agenda to build back better," one of Hoyer's advisers, Katie Grant Drew, told The Washington Post. "The House schedule will ensure time for the committee process and floor consideration of legislation as we get our work done for the American people." Meaning clawing back some of the "district work period," also known as "recess."

The momentum of the big COVID-19 relief bill, the American Rescue Plan, is all but dissipated now as the administration and Congress slog on with infrastructure, a process which gets more complicated and time-consuming with every day. That's in no small part because of that other pernicious Senate tradition, the filibuster.

As long as the Senate is deadlocked 50-50 and a very few Democrats refuse to do anything about it, this incredibly complied process of negotiating a path between Republicans who absolutely refuse to raise taxes and progressives who will refuse to pass any bill that doesn't invest heavily in combatting climate change, there's no quick way through the infrastructure process. It means weeks more of negotiating and bill writing. Even if there's a bipartisan bill voted on in the Senate in the handful of days they're in session next month, that's unlikely to move in the House tunnel there's a companion budget reconciliation bill—that can pass in the Senate on a simple majority vote, without Republicans. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has just a tiny majority of five Democrats and thus has to navigate carefully to get all of her caucus on board. The large progressive wing is likely to take up Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's idea of keeping a bipartisan bill that comes over from the Senate off of the floor until a reconciliation bill with progressive priorities is also passed.

In the background of these negotiations, Senate Republicans are making threats about something that really has to happen in the next few months—a debt ceiling hike, the means by which the U.S. can keep borrowing and doesn't end up defaulting on its outstanding debts which could create a global economic disaster. So of course Mitch McConnell and team are going to use it as a hostage. Again. Because that's what they do. As of now, the nation's borrowing power ends on July 31, but the Treasury Department can take measures to stretch out our fiscal solvency probably into September, early October.

"I'd say it's unlikely," that there are 10 Republicans who would vote for a clean debt ceiling hike, Sen. John Thune of South Dakota told The Hill. He's McConnell's #2, the minority whip. Sen. Roy Blunt, a Missouri Republican, agrees. He pointed to previous Republican hostage-taking of the debt ceiling "to try to figure out some mechanism to control future debt." He added "I would think it's likely to get 10 Republicans you're going to have to do some kind of spending reform to get a debt ceiling increase." That doesn't sound like a bunch that's ready to spend the trillions needed for infrastructure restoration.

So throw that onto the pile of critical work that has to happen in the next few months and handful of legislative days. Tied to that, inevitably, is government spending for FY2022, which will have to be done by October 1. That's really not likely to happen with an actual omnibus spending package, so there will almost certainly be yet another continuing resolution that will last a few weeks, a few months—inevitably being strung out until the week before Christmas because that's how it always works. It's not how it's supposed to work, but it's also not "normal" for the minority party in the Senate to do things like threaten to take the debt ceiling hostage, or shut down government, or refuse to seat the Supreme Court nominees of presidents from the other party, or let hundreds of thousands of people die on their watch while refusing to allow emergency relief legislation to pass for months.

There's also the pressing need to do something about saving our elections and our democracy before all of the states get into the redistricting—or as it's more likely to be in Republicans states, the gerrymandering process. That means passing the For the People Act as soon as possible. The first, procedural vote on that will be Tuesday of this week, with Schumer working closely with Manchin to get his agreement on the bill. Which Republicans will filibuster. Whether that will be enough to break through on filibuster reform, well, we'll find that out soon.

Yes, the calendar crisis Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer are not facing is largely not of their making, nor is the complete mess that Republicans—and particularly Mitch McConnell—have left them. But fixing it is in their power. That means cancelling as much of the upcoming recess as necessary to get the work done. They can take solace in the fact that it would really mess up Republicans' summer vacation plans, too.

There's no time like the present to get 'er done.  Keep the GOP back on its shit-kickin', election-stealin' heels!

 

Cartoon: How to relax this summer

If you are able, please consider joining the Sorensen Subscription Service!

Follow me on Twitter at @JenSorensen

Monday, June 21, 2021

Jan 6 Was the Blueprint: The GOP Is Now Planning a State by State Hostile Takeover

Trump supporters storm the grounds of the US Capitol on 6 January. (photo: Michael Reynolds/EPA)
Trump supporters storm the grounds of the US Capitol on 6 January. (photo: Michael Reynolds/EPA)

By Heather Digby Parton, Salon

21 June 21

readersupportednews.org


It's clear that the Republican assault on democracy is actually just beginning

n Sunday night, CNN aired a two-hour documentary called "Assault on Democracy" chronicling the evolution of the American right's most recent embrace of conspiracy theories and authoritarianism which led to the insurrection of January 6th. Unlike most of the recent TV examinations of this phenomenon, CNN didn't simply go back to the day Donald Trump descended the golden escalator in Trump Tower but traced the beginning of this latest lurch into right-wing lunacy to the election of Barack Obama and the furious backlash that ensued. (The seeds obviously go back much further, but this is a logical place to begin with the Tea Party's seamless transformation into MAGA.)

The program rightly attributes the massive growth in conspiracy theories to the rise in social media during that period and especially takes on Facebook for its algorithms that lead people deeper and deeper into insular rabbit holes. Crude profiteers such as Alex Jones and Breitbart are exposed as well as good old-fashioned talk radio and Fox News. There can be no denying the massive influence of those cynical propaganda outfits on the events that transpired over the past few years.

Perhaps the most disturbing moments in the special were the interviews with some of the MAGA faithful who were at the Capitol on January 6th, which was a trip to Bizarro World in itself. They still don't see anything wrong with what happened and most of them, whether they are QAnon, Proud Boys, religious leaders or local politicians, are obviously 100% sincere in their belief in Donald Trump. If you didn't think he was a cult leader before, you certainly will after hearing them talk about him. It's downright eerie.

Recounting the events of that awful day with all the dramatic footage, some of it new, in chronological order is still as dreadful to watch as ever. And we still are missing huge pieces of what happened that day.

We know that Trump snapped at Rep. Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., when the House minority leader asked him to call off his followers as they stormed the Capitol: "Maybe you just don't care as much about this election as they do!" It took much cajoling to get Trump to release the tepid statements he eventually made calling for peace and telling the insurrectionist that they are very special and he loves them. But for all the detailed leaking from the Trump White House over the course of four years, this is one afternoon they've kept a pretty tight lid on. (It's also clear that's one of the main reasons the Republicans have nixed the bipartisan commission, as some people would have to go under oath and testify about all that.)

Perhaps all of this seems tedious by now. After all, we all know the story. Most of us watched it play out in real-time. But as CNN's Brian Stelter pointed out, it's important to keep telling it because the purveyors of lies and conspiracies keep trying to whitewash it into something completely different. He quoted this tweet:

And as I noted last week, conceding to them also means letting down our guard and failing to be prepared for Insurrection Redux. Listening to those MAGA fans in the CNN documentary was very clarifying on that point. Those who took part in the insurrection and have been charged continue to believe they did nothing wrong and are no doubt prepared to do it again. Those who helped incite the mob from their pulpits and various rally stages have absolutely no regrets. There's no doubt that there could easily be more violence.

But just as important in continuing to tell the truth about January 6th is to continue to combat the Big Lie about the election.

The MAGA faithful have been completely brainwashed and I don't think they'll ever change their minds. But devious, partisan players are hard at work in the states subverting the electoral system in ways that are truly insidious. It's so bad that I think everyone is simply obligated to continue to focus very diligently on this issue. To that end. the New York Times reported some very disturbing new details out of Georgia, where Governor Brian Kemp signed a new law that allows Republicans to remove Democrats from local election boards:

Across Georgia, members of at least 10 county election boards have been removed, had their position eliminated or are likely to be kicked off through local ordinances or new laws passed by the state legislature. At least five are people of color and most are Democrats — though some are Republicans — and they will most likely all be replaced by Republicans.

Democrats in the state rightly point out that had these laws been in effect last fall, there's every chance that MAGA-friendly officials would have been put in charge of the election and Trump's requests to "find" votes might very well have been successful.

It isn't just local officials. Some states are going after statewide offices as well.

One of the more unbelievably transparent acts took place in Arizona, the epicenter of Big Lie activism, in which the Republican legislature introduced a bill that would strip the Democratic secretary of state of authority over election lawsuits. But in an act of epic chutzpah, they plan to have the law expire once she is out of office. (I assume they will reinstate it if another Democrat wins, but perhaps they feel they've put up enough roadblocks to ensure that never happens again). In Georgia, they've similarly turned the secretary of state's office into little more than a ceremonial position with little authority.

And this one is especially concerning because it tracks with the growing belief in a crackpot legal theory that state legislatures are the one and only legitimate arbiters of elections, superseding all other elected officials and the courts:

Kansas Republicans in May overrode a veto from Gov. Laura Kelly, a Democrat, to enact laws stripping the governor of the power to modify election laws and prohibiting the secretary of state, a Republican who repeatedly vouched for the security of voting by mail, from settling election-related lawsuits without the Legislature's consent.

It is only a matter of time before one of these states passes a law that openly allows the legislature to overturn an election — and then does it.

If you read the inane rationalizations by these Republican officials, some of whom are quoted saying they believe the Big Lie, it's clear that the assault on democracy is actually just beginning. And it isn't just about Donald Trump. The Republican Party realized that just a few tweaks to the election laws means they can call into question any election result they don't like and take steps to overturn it. They are also very well aware that the specter of January 6th violence hovers still hovers over the country and they have millions of agitated Americans who are willing to believe anything. They have power and they are using it.

"Just another tourist" poses with President Ford on Jan 6 - probably too stupid to realize Ford was a Republican.


Sunday, June 20, 2021

'Potentially the Worst Drought in 1,200 Years': Scientists on the Scorching US Heatwave

 A home destroyed in the 2020 North Complex Fire sits above Lake Oroville on Sunday, May 23, 2021, in Oroville, California. (photo: Noah Berger/AP)
A home destroyed in the 2020 North Complex Fire sits above Lake Oroville on Sunday, May 23, 2021, in Oroville, California. (photo: Noah Berger/AP)

By Maanvi Singh, Guardian UK

18 June 21

readersupportednews.org

Researchers had long forewarned of this crisis and now they’re seeing their studies and models become real life

he heatwave gripping the US west is simultaneously breaking hundreds of temperature records, exacerbating a historic drought and priming the landscape for a summer and fall of extreme wildfire.

Salt Lake City hit a record-breaking 107F (42C), while in Texas and California, power grid operators are asking residents to conserve energy to avoid rolling blackouts and outages. And all this before we’ve even reached the hottest part of the summer.

Among the 40 million Americans enduring the triple-digit temperatures are scientists who study droughts and the climate. They’d long forewarned of this crisis, and now they’re living through it. The Guardian spoke with researchers across the west about how they’re coping.

The paleoclimatologist: ‘Potentially the worst drought in 1,200 years’

Kathleen Johnson, California
Associate professor of Earth system science at the University of California, Irvine

I feel a little bit lucky because I’m in Orange county, relatively close to the coast – so the temperatures are not as severe here as they are in other parts of California and the west. I’m worried about this summer – this doesn’t bode well, in terms of what we can expect with wildfire and the worsening drought. This current drought is potentially on track to become the worst that we’ve seen in at least 1,200 years. And the reason is linked directly to human caused climate change.

As a paleoclimatologist my main point, always, is that we are able to look into the past. By looking at tree rings and other paleoclimate records, we’re able to gain really important perspectives about how climate has varied and changed in the past. And having done that, it’s clear that what we’re experiencing now is not natural. This is undoubtedly being caused by human activities, by greenhouse gas emissions.

The more we see these extreme events, piled on top of each other, and not just in the western US but globally, the more I think the reality of climate change becomes inescapable. And it feels absolutely overwhelming and sad. We are going to have less water, increased wildfires and more extreme heatwaves. But it’s also motivating. We need to continue to push for urgent action on climate change

The climate scientist: ‘The most distressing part? This was predictable’

Daniel Swain, Colorado
Climate scientist, Institute of the Environment and Sustainability,University of California, Los Angeles

This is really, really bad. Here on the eastern side of the Rockies, here in Boulder, we’re seeing record high temperatures. That’s the case in other parts of the state and in other states. And we’re seeing smoke plumes – not from local fires but from fires in Arizona and Utah. I think for a lot of people, it’s traumatic. The fires we saw in the last couple of years were really awful, and this year it seems like we’re on that same trajectory. It kind of feels like deja vu.

It does get rough sometime – talking about these things year after year. I live in the west, and all my family, pretty much, lives in the west. Most of my friends live in the west. It’s where I grew up, and seeing the landscape-scale transformations that are happening here, and seeing how it’s affecting people is overwhelming sometimes. But actually to me, the most distressing part is that this is very much in line with predictions. Climate scientists have been repeating essentially the same messages and warnings since before I was born.

Climate change is a major contributor to, if not the dominant factor, in a lot of the changes that we’re seeing out west and elsewhere. And it just is going to keep getting worse unless we do something about it. And so far, you know, we have yet to do the kinds of things, on a large enough scale, that are actually going to make a meaningful difference.

The atmospheric scientist: ‘It’s surreal to see your models become real life’

Katharine Hayhoe, Texas
Climate scientist and chief scientist at the Nature Conservancy

The extreme heat and the wildfires aren’t surprising. But it is just surreal to see what you only ever saw before in your research studies and models, actually happening in real life. And you’re almost dumbfounded by the speed at which your projections have become reality.

Climate change is loading the weather dice against us. We always have a chance of rolling a double six naturally, and getting an intense record breaking summer heatwave. But decade by decade as the world warms, it’s as if climate change is sneaking in and taking one of those numbers on the dice and turning it into another six, and then another six. And maybe even a seven. So we are seeing that heatwaves are coming earlier in the year, they are longer, they are stronger.

Still, public opinion data shows that there’s a disconnect, where even though about 72% of people in the US say global warming is happening, only 40% say that they think that it will affect them directly. But we actually did a recent study, looking at climate and weather extremes – and we found that really hot, dry conditions are the only thing that most people in the US directly connect to climate change. So right now is a really important time for scientists to communicate with the public that climate change is here, and climate action matters.

The meteorologist: ‘The ground is burning like a hotplate’

Simon Wang, Utah
Professor of climate dynamics at Utah State University

Yesterday, when Salt Lake City hit record temperatures, we went to one of our grad students’ back yards to barbecue some burgers and do some work. But it was so hot – oh my gosh, 107F (42C). So hot that, actually three out of five students’ computers overheated and broke. I was the first to throw in the white flag and ask to go home – I really hurting.

As a meteorologist, of course this isn’t a surprise. The warming climate is making these dry, hot periods even drier and hotter. Since we’re in a drought, we don’t really have much moisture in the soil. And without that moisture, the sun really heats up the ground and the air much faster. So, really what we’re seeing in the south-west is, the ground is burning like a hotplate. And we’re standing on it.

But you know, I actually feel kind of optimistic. In the restaurants and beer houses right now, everybody is talking about the weather, and how hot it is. And a few of them will even comment, “This is the new normal.” And I mean – we’re in Utah! Whatever people believe in, they know it’s really hot, and the climate is changing – and they don’t like that. These compounding extreme weather events are really bad – but they’re going to keep happening, no matter what. Maybe if there’s some good to come out of it, it’s that people are becoming more aware. And the sooner the general public starts to become aware of this issue, the sooner, hopefully, they’ll push for changes to address the crisis. So actually, if you saw me walking around outside this week, I probably had a smile on my face as I listened to some of these conversations.

Future of the US West: Climate change-induced heat inevitably turns to fire.

Saturday, June 19, 2021

Republicans now trying to literally starve Americans to force them back into $7.25/hr jobs

CHICAGO, IL - APRIL 15:  Demonstrators gather in front of a McDonald's restaurant to call for an increase in minimum wage on April 15, 2015 in Chicago, Illinois. The demonstration was one  of many held nationwide to draw attention to the cause.  (Photo by

We are American businesses, and we are not amused.

It was one thing to be forced by some pencil-necked liberal governors to run our operations at half-capacity (or worse, shutting down altogether for practically a year). But there wasn’t much we could do about that, with so many states stupidly putting their citizens’ health and lives over our profits. So OK, we played their little game for a while. That slick bullshit about how “essential”  workers were at places like Amazon, Home Depot and WalMart was pretty funny, wasn’t it?. Yeah, they sure were “essential” all right — essential to keep us out of total bankruptcy, thank you very much. Our yachts in the Caribbean thank you for your service.

But enough is enough. Time to go to back to work, kids. Pandemic’s over. What, you don’t want to show up for $7.25 an hour? Hell, we’ll be generous and throw in an extra hundred bucks to start. We’ll call it a signing bonus. Not enough? You’re kidding, right? You want $15 an hour now? You’ve gotta be fucking kidding me. Don’t make me call the governor. Don’t make me call my Republican state legislator. Oops, too late, you made me do it, you ungrateful slackers!

See that? All it took was a phone call and poof! There went your extra unemployment aid. Don’t like it? Well you can always try voting them out (Good luck getting your vote counted, we’re working on that one right now!).

So really people, in all seriousness, WTF?  Now that we’ve cut off your unemployment, where the hell are you? I still can’t staff my Widget McWidget factory. I still can’t find wait staff for my famous national restaurant chain. Guess it’s time to call my GOP stooges in the legislature again and raise some hell! Well, look at this! My buddies at ALEC have a great idea—how’s about we just cut off your food?

As reported by Laura Reiley, writing for the Washington Post:

States around the country are attempting to make it harder for needy families to access federal food-assistance programs.

Republican lawmakers in Ohio, Arizona, Arkansas, Missouri, Montana and others have proposed more restrictive policies to qualify for food assistance, cutting off benefits to those who have saved a little money or who drive a halfway decent car, or adding paperwork requirements to document tiny changes in income and efforts to find work.

As Reiley observes, according to the latest Census data about 20 million adults in this country as of June 7 reported that their households didn’t have enough to eat. Despite the efforts of President Biden and  Democrats in Congress who in March essentially forced through COVID-19 relief legislation with no Republican support to provide further food assistance to families as the  pandemic began to slowly wane, those benefits are starting to run out.

But Republicans in states under their control are saying no more—we’re done. They say the problem isn’t food, it’s that these people just don’t want to come back to work.  And they’ve whipped out out some careful research to back up their claims:

“There are many unfilled job openings out there, and to the extent that any program holds people back from seeking employment, that’s something states want to counteract,” said Angela Rachidi, a Rowe scholar in poverty studies at the American Enterprise Institute, a conservative think tank. “There is evidence to suggest that SNAP reduces employment. And during the pandemic [the USDA] allowed flexibility in long-standing integrity measures, so it’s perfectly appropriate for states to reintroduce those now.”

Leaving aside the inherent biases of someone who conducts “poverty studies” for the American Enterprise Institute, the “evidence” Ms. Rachidi (apparently) cites is from a 2011 study which has little if any relevance in an economy only now beginning to shrug off a year and a half of compulsory hibernation, where childcare centers, for example have not even begun to re-open at capacity.

But apparently facts don’t matter when you’re on the receiving end of fierce complaints from your corporate donors about how it’s taking so much time to re-establish those profit margins.

As Reiley reports:

Republicans nationwide have been criticizing unemployment insurance and benefits such as SNAP, saying they are causing labor market difficulties and providing an incentive for Americans to stay home and avoid returning to work.

The “idea,” as Reiley describes it, is “by removing the safety net,” i.e., cutting off SNAP and other food benefits to people, it will essentially force them to come back like good little farm animals to their troughs. So Republican legislators in Ohio, for example, have inserted little poison pellets in their state budgets, adding onerous paperwork requirements and setting thresholds in which people receiving SNAP must report increases in income of as little as $500, and provisions cutting off benefits if they have a car worth more than $4650, or have the princely sum of $2250 in total savings.

That’s it. Drive a $4000 car and you lose your right to food benefits for your kids. Because that makes you rich! Left unmentioned, of course, is the fact that anyone who is driving a car worth only $4000 is likely to see car repair bills in the near future that will likely drain those massive “savings” in an instant. Reiley quotes a Republican Ohio legislator named Tim Schaeffer who hides behind the time-tested Republican excuse for all cuts in benefits to low-income Americans: rooting out “wasteful fraud,” of course. This from a party that gave millionaires a two trillion dollar tax cut.

Other GOP-led states are requiring proof of child support payments be proffered by women who are claiming benefits, as if obtaining child support in a pandemic from absent, unemployed fathers was a matter of flipping a switch for most women. Nevermind trying to find a family court that doesn’t have a mile-long backlog right now.

As Reiley points out, these cookie-cutter provisions being implemented at the state level are being drafted by “right-wing advocacy groups such as the Foundation of Government Accountability or American Legislative Exchange Council.” 

But we already knew that. Because if there’s one group of people that truly doesn’t want to work, it would be Republican legislators.

Cutting off people’s food is just the latest in a string of heinous efforts by Republicans to satisfy their business and corporate constituents by blaming workers for the fact that businesses can’t find workers willing to work for slave wages. It appears they’ll try anything to force people back to work except actually raising wages.

So here’s a novel thought for you business owners to chew on: if you can’t afford to pay workers a decent wage, maybe your business doesn’t deserve to exist in the first place.

Heresy, I know.

We are the majority.  They want to take the vote away from us.  And to overturn election results they don't like.  It is more important now than ever to fight to save democracy in our country.  This is not socialism.  It is democracy in action!

Friday, June 18, 2021

Mitch McConnell Vows to Never Let Democrats Add a Justice to the Supreme Court Again

Moscow Mitch strains as he ejects logic from his nether region.
 

By Bess Levin, Vanity Fair

18 June 21

readersupportednews.org

hy do people run for office? For some, it’s to make a better world for their children. For others, it’s a passion for government. For Mitch McConnell, it’s to fuck over Democrats at every possible opportunity, his neck pouch quivering with joy as he shreds small “d” democracy over and over and over again.

Obviously, one of McConnell’s favorite ways to screw not just his colleagues on the other side of the aisle but the millions of Americans who voted for them is by denying the other party the ability to add justices to the Supreme Court, based on made-up logic he literally pulls out of his ass as it suits him. In 2016, of course, he spent nearly an entire year blocking Barack Obama’s Supreme Court nominee, Merrick Garland, claiming that presidents aren’t allowed to put someone on the court in an election year and that he had to delay the confirmation so the voters could decide. (They did, and it was in 2012 when they decided they wanted Obama to be president again.)

Fast-forward four years later, though, and with just weeks to go until the 2020 election, McConnell didn’t just ram through Amy Coney Barrett‘s confirmation, he announced he would do so basically before Ruth Bader Ginsburg‘s body was cold. The night RBG died, McConnell, the most shameless man to ever live, released a statement saying that he would move quickly to confirm Trump’s nominee, rewriting the completely arbitrary rule he invented to block Obama’s replacement for Antonin Scalia. And to lay the hackery on extra thick, he cast his absurd reversal as a fulfillment of a promise to the American people. “In the last midterm election before Justice Scalia’s death in 2016,” McConnell said, “Americans elected a Republican Senate majority because we pledged to check and balance the last days of a lame-duck president’s term. We kept our promise. Since the 1880s, no Senate has confirmed an opposite-party president’s Supreme Court nominee in a presidential election year. By contrast, Americans reelected our majority in 2016 and expanded it in 2018 because we pledged to work with President Trump and support his agenda, particularly his outstanding appointments to the federal judiciary. Once again, we will keep our promise.” Then he went on to clear the way for a woman who thinks there are some instances when abortion should be punishable by death to be confirmed to a lifetime appointment on the highest court in the land with the election less than 2 months away.

At this point, you could reasonably assume that with Joe Biden in power, McConnell would once again revert to his position that presidents can’t seat someone on the court within an election year. And of course, he has. But he’s also amended the policy to basically state that he’ll never let a Democratic president get a justice on the Supreme Court again so long as he’s in power, even if said president has nearly two years left on his term.

McConnell wasn’t asked about confirming a Democratic nominee in 2021 or 2022 because he is not actually the majority leader at the moment, but it’s pretty clear if he was he’d come up with—and implement—some kind of rule saying that only Republicans can add justices to court. Which is obviously insane and corrupt and shameless but hey, that’s Mitch, the guy who said last month that he is “100%” focused on blocking Biden‘s agenda, up to and including all the parts that might actually help Americans. Which would explain why many people are openly begging for Justice Stephen Breyer, 81, to retire. Asked about the situation on Sunday, Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez told CNN, “You know, it’s something I think about, but I would probably lean towards yes.… I would give more thought to it, but I’m inclined to say yes.” She did not add, “Because Biden needs to get a liberal on the court before that old crone from Kentucky can snatch the seat out of Democrats’ fingers,” but presumably she was thinking it.

P.S. Trump’s Justice Department spied on White House employees too

It wasn’t just his congressional nemeses and enemies in the press. Per The New York Times:

The Justice Department subpoenaed Apple for information in February 2018 about an account that belonged to Donald F. McGahn II, President Donald J. Trump’s White House counsel at the time, and barred the company from telling him about it, according to two people briefed on the matter. Apple told Mr. McGahn about the subpoena last month, said one of the people, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the matter. Mr. McGahn’s wife also received a similar notice from Apple, the person said.

It is not clear what FBI agents were investigating, whether Mr. McGahn was their specific focus, or whether he was swept up in a larger net because he had communicated with someone who was under scrutiny. As the top lawyer for the 2016 Trump campaign and then the White House counsel, Mr. McGahn was in contact with numerous people who may have drawn attention either as part of the Russia investigation or a later leak inquiry. Still, the disclosure that agents had collected data of a sitting White House counsel, which they kept secret for years, is extraordinary.

While we don’t know exactly what the DOJ was looking for, as the Times notes, we do know things were tense between Trump and McGahn around the time the department went after the White House counsel’s records. A month prior, per the Times, Trump had “tried to persuade Mr. McGahn to make a statement falsely denying” that he’d been asked to fire special counsel Robert Mueller, as press reports had indicated. Trump is said to have told aides that McGahn was a “liar” and a “leaker,” according to former Trump administration officials. And it seems he decided to use the power of the DOJ to go after him!

Area senator temporarily blocked from spreading bullshit medical advice

Ron Johnson knows what we’re talking about:

YouTube suspended GOP senator Ron Johnson’s account on Friday after he posted comments regarding dubious treatments for COVID-19. “We removed the video in accordance with our COVID-19 medical misinformation policies, which don’t allow content that encourages people to use hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin to treat or prevent the virus,” a YouTube spokesperson said in a statement to CNN.... For months Johnson—who tested positive for coronavirus last fall—has spread anti-vaccine misinformation and downplayed the urgency of vaccinating all Americans against COVID-19, putting the controversial Wisconsin Republican at odds with public health guidance aimed at easing the ongoing pandemic. The two-term senator, who’s facing reelection next year, has also downplayed the seriousness of the insurrection at the U.S. Capitol on January 6.

YouTube doesn’t allow medical misinformation about COVID-19, including anything that recommends use of ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine for the treatment or prevention of COVID-19, according to the company. In July of 2020, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration revoked an emergency use authorization for hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine to treat COVID-19. The agency now says hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine have not been shown to be safe and effective for treating or preventing COVID-19.

Hydroxychloroquine, of course, was one of Dr. Donald Trump’s big recommendations to the public, second only to his suggestion that they shoot up household cleaner, leading the manufacturer of Lysol to issue a statement saying that “under no circumstance” should disinfectant be injected into one’s body.

In an extremely huffy statement, Johnson told CNN that YouTube has “decided there is only one medical viewpoint allowed and it is the viewpoint dictated by government agencies. YouTube’s ongoing COVID censorship proves they have accumulated too much unaccountable power. Big Tech and mainstream media believe they are smarter than medical doctors who have devoted their lives to science and use their skills to save lives.”

Marjorie Taylor Greene is sorry about that stuff she said about Jews

Just kidding, she’s sorry she’s getting backlash over it, and is hoping this stunt field trip to the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum helps:

Freshman Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene paid a visit to the Holocaust museum on Monday in a bid to defuse the controversy over her comments comparing vaccine and mask requirements to Nazi Germany.... Greene’s museum visit comes as one Jewish House Democrat, Illinois rep. Brad Schneider, prepares to introduce a censure resolution condemning Greene’s latest comments on the Holocaust. Some Democrats are already privately discussing censure as a potential response to a group of Republican lawmakers pushing a censure resolution against one of their caucus members, Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), for her recent remarks on Israel.

Last month Greene claimed that “any rational Jewish person” thinks mask mandates are as bad as the Holocaust. She’s also previously blamed California wildfires on Jewish space lasers.

You Democrats just get out of the way.  I'm runnin' this country and ain't nothin' you can do about it.

Thursday, June 17, 2021

'It wasn't an insurrection,' House Republican explains vote against honoring Jan. 6 police officers

A protester, who claims to be a member of the Proud Boys, confronts police officers as supporters of US President Donald Trump protest outside the US Capitol on January 6, 2021, in Washington, DC. - Demonstrators breeched security and entered the Capitol as Congress debated the a 2020 presidential election Electoral Vote Certification. (Photo by ALEX EDELMAN / AFP) (Photo by ALEX EDELMAN/AFP via Getty Images) 
I was just asking the nice policeman for directions...to Nancy Pelosi's office.

On Jan. 6, officers from the Capitol Police and the D.C. Metropolitan Police put their safety—and even their lives—on the line to defend the U.S. Capitol and the Congress against insurrection. On June 15, 21 House Republicans voted against awarding those officers the Congressional Gold Medal.

As many people have observed, the Republican commitment to police goes only so far. 

Back in March, just 12 Republicans voted against an earlier version of the legislation, which was bad enough. But now, apparently, the need to cover up what happened on Jan. 6 has spread. The votes against the bill came from:

  1. Lauren Boebert of Colorado
  2. John Rose of Tennessee
  3. Andy Harris of Maryland
  4. Thomas Massie of Kentucky
  5. Bob Good of Virginia
  6. Louie Gohmert of Texas
  7. Barry Moore of Alabama
  8. Ralph Norman of South Carolina
  9. Matt Rosendale of Montana
  10. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia
  11. Chip Roy of Texas
  12. Paul Gosar of Arizona
  13. Andy Biggs of Arizona
  14. Warren Davidson of Ohio
  15. Scott Perry of Pennsylvania
  16. Matt Gaetz of Florida
  17. Greg Steube of Florida
  18. Andrew Clyde of Georgia
  19. Jody Hice of Georgia
  20. Mary Miller of Illinois
  21. Michael Cloud of Texas

Rep. Lance Gooden voted against the March bill but for the June bill, he was the only vote to flip in that direction.

Some of the Republicans voting against honoring the officers who defended them said they did so because of language in the bill. Greene and Massie both cited the use of “insurrection” to describe the events and the description of the Capitol as the “temple of our democracy.” (Presumably they’d rather the title of “temple of our democracy” go to Mar-a-Lago.)

If they just wanted to give the police recognition, they could have done it without trying to make it partisan,” Massie said. So simply calling an insurrection an insurrection is now partisan. Again: Republicans are engaging in a slow-rolling cover-up.

They were protesting and I don't approve of the way they protested, but it wasn't an insurrection. My goodness. Can you imagine what a real insurrection would look like?” Massie responded when pressed by reporters. 

Well, I think it might look something like bombs planted outside the offices of political parties, people arriving in the nation’s capitol in trucks stocked with Molotov cocktails, police barricades being tossed aside and police assaulted, windows and doors being smashed in, a gallows erected outside the Capitol, men in tactical gear roaming the halls carrying flex cuffs, and hundreds of people massed outside a door chanting “heave ho” as they try to overwhelm the officers defending the door. 

Others who voted against the bill were even more glib. “It’s all politics. It’s all garbage,” said Perry.

The bill honors all of the officers who defended the Capitol, and specifically mentions “Capitol Police Officers Brian Sicknick and Howard Liebengood, Metropolitan Police Department Officer Jeffrey Smith, and those who sustained injuries, and the courage of Capitol Police Officer Eugene Goodman, exemplify the patriotism and the commitment of Capitol Police officers, and those of other law enforcement agencies, to risk their lives in service of our country.”

A large majority of House Republicans did vote for it, of course. But the fact that the number who voted against it increased substantially is a warning sign, and one that follows the other screaming, flashing warning sign of Senate Republicans having filibustered the legislation that would have established a bipartisan independent commission to investigate the insurrection. Just 35 House Republicans voted for that legislation, which means that nearly as many Republicans oppose honoring the police who defended them as support investigating to find out what happened. This is the Republican Party telling us about its direction.

How can you call it an insurrection?  We're just a bunch of guys hangin' around.  And speaking of hanging, has anybody seen Mike Pence?

Trump’s Weird War Against the States

Heather Digby Parton / Salon President Donald Trump. (photo: Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg/Gett...