Wednesday, October 21, 2026

Putin Has Trump Right Where He Wants Him

 President's outright betrayal of Ukraine shows the U.S. is in a precarious position 
 
Heather Digby Parton / Salon
 

America’s descent into chaos and depravity was foretold 10 years ago at a press conference. Donald Trump, who had just been nominated for president at the 2016 Republican National Convention, issued an invitation for one of America’s foes to hack the emails of Hillary Clinton, the former secretary of state and Democratic nominee for president. 

Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing,” he said. “I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press.”

The call came only days after emails from the Democratic National Committee were released following the hacking of the organization’s computer servers, which was widely assumed to have been perpetrated by Russian agents. As would become the habit over the following decade, many dismissed Trump’s remarks as mere trolling that weren’t intended to be taken seriously.

This was not the first time he had invoked Russia. Throughout the primary season, Trump had gushed in multiple interviews about Russian President Vladimir Putin and signaled his intentions to draw closer to Putin once in office. Trump even defended the dictator’s extra-judicial killings, blithely explaining, “Our country does plenty of killing.” But the press conference did mark the first time he enlisted Russia as his ally.

The overtures continued throughout Trump’s first term, most infamously when he sided with Putin during a bilateral meeting over America’s own intelligence agencies, which had found that Russia had interfered in the 2016 election. The president suggested an “election integrity” sharing operation between the two countries, a proposal that made it clear Putin had Trump wrapped around his little finger.

Then came Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine. Throughout the 2024 election, Trump pledged to end the war in Ukraine within 24 hours of taking office — or of being elected. (His rhetoric often shifted.) 

He apparently believed that he could get on the phone with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and order him to immediately surrender or face his mighty wrath. Needless to say, this did not happen, and since then Trump has grown increasingly frustrated that he’s been shown to be nothing more than a paper tiger, a frustration that has now reached fever pitch due to his abject failure in the Iran war. 

Desperate for a “win” — by which he means a Russian win — the president is now in the process of completely selling out Ukraine to his good friend Vlad.

In recent days, Trump has signed an executive order temporarily lifting the sanctions on Russian oil. While supposedly done to secure diesel fuel for the United States, which has seen prices skyrocket due to the president’s war of choice with Iran, the act is in practice a sign of goodwill toward Putin, America’s enemy, and will help him fund his war against Ukraine, our erstwhile ally. 

A few days later, Trump waived several additional sanctions that a bipartisan congressional majority had passed just a few weeks ago at the behest of the late Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., who foolishly believed himself to have the president under his control.

Worse yet, in what will go down as one of the most appalling betrayals by a U.S. president in history, Trump and his good friend Elon Musk apparently sabotaged Ukrainian intelligence by slowing the Starlink and Starshield communications systems the country relies on for its defensive and offensive weapons systems. 

Russia took swift advantage of the favor and unleashed one of the most massive bombardments of the war, killing civilians and hitting Ukraine’s energy sector. Trump also called for Zelenskyy’s ouster, and in an interview with Bloomberg published Sunday, the Ukrainian president accused Trump of pushing the country to surrender to Russia.

Trump has a number of apparent rationales for these moves. He wants to be seen before the midterms to be doing something about the price of gas and diesel. But that is a crisis of his own making due to his misbegotten war in Iran, for which he has no way out that will solve the problem. His ongoing war has altered the global energy markets in ways that are not easily fixed, which was the reason no president before him was stupid enough to attack Iran. 

So now Trump is blaming Ukraine because it is bombing Russian oil refineries and demanding they stop so that Russia can sell its diesel — and finance its war, which led to the sanctions in the first place. Not to be overlooked is that Russia is a staunch ally of Iran and is helping them fight us, which Trump has waved off as having “nothing.” Some might argue that could constitute providing “aid and comfort” to America’s enemy.

Meanwhile, fingers are being pointed in multiple directions. Musk said the government is to blame for the Starlink/Starshield gambit. According to sources in the Pentagon, the order came from the White House. Trump claimed he doesn’t know anything about it. Secretary of State Marco Rubio shrugged that “it just sort of happened.” 

Now, lest the Europeans get it in their heads that they should try to step up their own defenses by restricting Starlink in favor of a European-based system, the U.S. government is reportedly threatening them with “devastating” or “destructive” economic retaliation.

As a cherry on top of the administration’s full-on embrace of Russia, the Wall Street Journal reported that Putin has floated a summit with Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping to decide Ukraine’s fate. (On Monday, Trump told reporters he was open to a meeting but denied it would focus on Ukraine, saying he wanted to discuss denuclearization.) 

If Trump knew any history, he would know that such a meeting would prove to be his Yalta, the trilateral conference between President Franklin Roosevelt, British Prime Minister Winston Churchill and Soviet Premier Joseph Stalin that carved up Europe in the wake of World War II. The summit became widely seen by the right as “the sell-out at Yalta” because the Soviets ended up with Eastern Europe, but things have changed within the GOP.

The summit is clearly intended to elevate Russia back to superpower status, which it is not in any economic or military sense, and to demonstrate a new order in which Trump, Putin and Xi run the world. In reality, Putin and Xi now have the United States dancing to their tune, handing them power and influence to dominate their respective spheres.

The president’s flagrant betrayal of Ukraine is an outrage that has seemingly awakened some of the slumbering Republicans who know they are facing a drubbing at the polls in the quickly approaching midterm elections. Whether it will arouse the consciences of enough to truly step up and stop this breach of trust is unknown. 

But the mere fact that Trump has gone this far to salve his ego, defy his critics by embracing Putin even more fervently and drum up a lame excuse for what may be the worst national security decision in American history leaves this country weaker, poorer and more distrusted around the world. It hardly seems possible, but we have reached yet another new low.

"The president suggested an “election integrity” sharing operation between the two countries, a proposal that made it clear Putin had Trump wrapped around his little finger."

Tuesday, October 20, 2026

10 people who are screwed if Democrats win

 President Donald Trump is illuminated by a photographers flash as he walks from Marine One after arriving on the South Lawn of the White House, Monday, Oct. 12, 2026, in Washington. (AP Photo/Julia Demaree Nikhinson)

President Donald Trump AP
 
 
EXAMPLE: If their daddy weren't president, the Trump boys would be relegated to owning a used-car dealerhip
 

People in President Donald Trump’s orbit have to be incredibly nervous about the Democrats retaking Congress and regaining the ability to investigate the vast swath of corruption that has been the hallmark of this administration. 

Because of that, it was exceedingly tough to keep this list to just 10 of those people, so consider this a sampling of who will probably be facing an absolute grip of subpoenas. 

And sure, Trump is likely going to try to pardon literally everyone on his way out the door, but that will only protect them from criminal consequences. It won’t do a damn thing to prevent Democrats from dragging them in front of Congress to lay all their malfeasance bare. 

So without further ado, here are the top 10 people who will be most screwed in the event of a blue wave.

10. Curtis Wood

You might not know his name, but you know his work on the Reflecting Pool.

Somehow, even though he completely screwed up pretty much every part of that, his company got to keep the millions from its sweet no-bid contract. And then, as the cherry on top, it also got millions more to fix its own screw-ups. 

It’s good to be Trump’s pool boy, apparently. 

9. Todd Blanche

Attorney General Todd Blanche has thus far dodged any consequences for his wildly unethical behavior, even as 101 former federal and state judges filed a bar complaint against him. 

Blanche has generally managed to avoid testifying under oath, and wouldn’t you if you were in his shoes? But that friendly little arrangement that allows him to lie with impunity will disappear on Jan. 3, 2026. 

So enjoy your impunity while it lasts, Todd.

8. Lindsey Halligan

Oh, Lindsey. She’s very much gone, but very much not forgotten. You’d think since she had such a brief stay as interim U.S. attorney she might not make the top 10, but given that her entire tenure was extremely sketchy, here she is. 

LIndsey Halligan
LIndsey HalliganAP

Halligan somehow managed to land indictments of both former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James after actual, factual career attorneys told the administration they wouldn’t—because there was no crime for which to indict.

But once a federal magistrate said that she made “fundamental misstatements of the law that could compromise the integrity of the grand jury process,” the jig was kind of up. 

7. Tom Homan

Compared to a lot of people on this list, the border czar is a small fry. All Homan did was accept a $50,000 bribe in a brown paper bag. In the Trump administration, that’s basically pocket change.

But the real reason to haul Homan in front of Congress is to ask him who, exactly, made the investigation into that bribe go away, allowing him to join the administration in the first place. 

Inquiring minds want to know!

6. Sean Duffy

Chat, is it good when the transportation secretary spends seven months on a family road trip sponsored by companies he regulates? 

Duffy’s “Great American Road Trip,” which was so low-rent it only aired on YouTube, presented potential sponsors with an offer to “partner” with Duffy to advertise their wares during his sojourn. 

What a delight it will be to hear from Sean about what sort of quid pro quo Toyota and Boeing got for sponsoring this thing. 

5. Kristi Noem

Where do I even start? 

Noem managed to pack so much corruption into her relatively brief stay atop the Department of Homeland Security that it’s hard to pick and choose. But Democrats should definitely—DEFINITELY—inquire about the $220 million she spent on ads where she rode around South Dakota on a horsey.

But how could Democrats resist also asking her about her flying loveshack with Corey Lewandowski or the hundreds of millions of dollars she showered on one of her donors on her last day? 

4. Elon Musk

Musk is one of the most repugnant creatures to attach himself to this administration, and Democrats should go after him on two fronts. 

Elon Musk flashes his t-shirt that reads "DOGE" to the media as he walks on South Lawn of the White House, in Washington, Sunday, March 9, 2025. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana)
Elon Musk wears a “DOGE” shirt.AP

First, there’s the carnage he created with the so-called Department of Government Efficiency. Musk should be made to answer for having his little minions storm the Social Security Administration, for dismantling the U.S. Agency for International Development, and so much more. 

But it will also be an absolute delight to probe him on all of his sweetheart deals with the Trump administration—which he got as a “special government employee."

3. Jared Kushner

Somehow, Kushner has managed to keep a much lower profile during Trump’s second term, but that doesn’t mean that he isn’t making money moves. 

Kushner is, inexplicably, one of our lead negotiators in the Middle East. And at the same time, his private-equity firm Affinity Partners is financed by … Middle Eastern countries like Saudi Arabia. 

Can’t wait to hear his explanation to a House committee about how this was all totally fine. 

2. Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump

Ah, the Trump sons. 

If their daddy weren’t president, they would be relegated to owning a used-car dealership in upstate New York or working as slumlords in some seedy New York City buildings. 

Instead, they’ve made so much money from no-bid federal contracts, just straight-up giveaways of your tax dollars. Besides their unique ability to fleece the U.S. taxpayer, the Trump fail-sons should also be made to answer for their participation in Trump’s crypto grift.

1. Donald Trump

For literally everything. 

Every last bit of his family’s crypto grift. Everything about his Internal Revenue Service immunity deal. Everything about all of his cronies’ extremely well-timed stock trades. Every last no-bid contract. Everything about the bribe palace ballroom and the rest of his D.C. destruction. 

Just … everything. 

Ahhh for the good old days when men had their way with girls, er... women.
 

Saturday, October 17, 2026

Trump Plays Russian Roulette on Eve of Midterms

Trump Plays Russian Roulette on Eve of Midterms  
President Donald Trump and Russian president Vladimir Putin (photo: Brendan Lynch/Axios.)
 
Screws Ukraine by showering Moscow with one-sided concessions 
 
 Zachary Basu / Axios

President Trump is indulging his fondness for Vladimir Putin at a moment of acute political peril, forcing Republicans in the midterms to take cover as he showers Moscow with one-sided concessions.

Why it matters: With just three weeks until the election, Trump is rekindling a decade-long, scandal-scarred relationship with a dictator reviled by most Americans — including his own supporters.

Driving the news: Since speaking with Putin on Friday, Trump has embarked on a remarkable five-day campaign of diplomatic concessions and cover for Russia — sparking bipartisan blowback just as voters prepare to cast their ballots.

  • On Sunday, Trump blindsided Zelensky by declaring an immediate "energy ceasefire." Russia has continued attacking Ukrainian energy infrastructure, with no apparent consequences from Washington.

  • On Monday, Trump dismissed months of intelligence-based reports that Russia was enabling Iran's war effort by supplying information about U.S. military assets.

  • On Tuesday, Trump doubled down on the diesel deal and brushed off concerns that the proceeds could finance Russia's war machine, even as GOP senators labeled it a "betrayal" and "a gift to our adversary."

Between the lines: The benefits to Russia are clear. Far less apparent is what Trump's concessions accomplish for American security, European allies or his own political fortunes.

  • For America: Energy analysts doubt the diesel deal will meaningfully ease fuel prices sent soaring by the Iran war.

  • For Europe: Washington is breaking ranks with a NATO alliance confronting a historic threat environment, as Russia escalates its hybrid campaign of sabotage, cyberattacks and drone incursions.

  • For Republicans: With control of Congress hanging in the balance, Trump is embracing a dictator viewed unfavorably by 81% of his own 2024 voters, according to a January YouGov poll.

The big picture: Trump's warm relationship with Putin has haunted his political career since 2016, when Russia interfered in the presidential election to help him defeat Hillary Clinton.

  • From the Mueller investigation to the Helsinki summit, Trump's deference toward Putin has long divided Republicans and put him at odds with his own national security establishment.

  • A decade of investigations, scandals and Washington outrage has done little to shake that affinity. If anything, the scrutiny appears to have hardened Trump's determination to defy the foreign-policy consensus.

What they're saying: On Monday, Trump again suggested that Russia was more interested in ending the war than the country it invaded, telling reporters: "I think, actually, Putin wants to make a deal more than Zelensky."

  • "The President's diesel deal will help lower prices for farmers, truckers, and families across the nation as he simultaneously urges both sides of the Russia-Ukraine conflict to stop strikes against refineries, which are driving up costs and hurting American consumers," White House spokesperson Anna Kelly said in a statement.

The bottom line: Losing control of Congress could paralyze Trump's legislative agenda and expose his administration to years of investigations and subpoenas.

  • But as polling alarms pile up, the president appears increasingly willing to follow his raw political instincts, regardless of the consequences for Republicans fighting to keep him in power.

  • In a Truth Social post Tuesday, Trump made clear that he sees himself as personally immune from the results of the midterms, writing: "I'm not running in the Elections, I've already won, IN A MASSIVE LANDSLIDE."
    Ukraine had Russia on the ropes until Trump jumped into bed with Putin.
     

Friday, October 16, 2026

Giant gold statue of Trump isn't his favorite

  

Gilded "Orange Plague" adorns busy intersection in France 

Posted by

 

Quora.com 

Trump’s allies are FURIOUS after a giant golden statue of a naked Trump went on display inside the European Parliament, and their reactions are absolutely priceless.

Donald Trump loves claiming that America is more respected around the world than ever. The European Parliament appears to have a rather different opinion.

An 8.5-foot sculpture titled “Orange Plague” has been installed at a busy intersection between two European Parliament buildings in Strasbourg, France. The gilded statue depicts a nude Trump covered in 23-carat gold leaf, holding the scales of justice in one hand and a long golf club in the other, with a golf ball representing the world.

He is sitting on the shoulders of a smaller, fully clothed man who appears to be struggling under his weight.

The message on the plinth reads:

“I am sitting on the back of a man. He is sinking under my burden. I will do anything to help him. Except stepping down from his back.”

Danish artist Jens Galschiot, who created the sculpture, said Trump represents a major threat to the rules-based international order, democratic values, and efforts to address the climate crisis. The work was inspired by “The Emperor’s New Clothes,” the famous tale about a vain ruler whose subjects are too afraid to tell him the truth.

Per Clausen, a left-wing Danish member of the European Parliament who invited Galschiot to exhibit the piece, said he isn't concerned about Trump's reaction.

“If someone is so thin-skinned that they cannot tolerate this sculpture being exhibited in the European Parliament, then they have no place on the world stage,” Clausen said.

The sculpture has appeared at other major events, including the COP30 climate summit in Brazil and the Munich Security Conference. Visitors in Strasbourg can even receive miniature versions, while the artist has made files available online for people with 3D printers.

And the contrast with Trump’s own taste in statues couldn't be more obvious.

Trump previously unveiled a flattering 15-foot golden statue of himself, “Don Colossus,” at his Miami golf course, depicting him fully clothed with his fist raised. He has also discussed plans for giant golden statues of himself at his presidential library in Miami.

So yes, Trump apparently has no problem with golden statues of Trump.

Just maybe not this one.

Trump's MAGA supporters, meanwhile, absolutely lost it.

One complained that the sculpture was a “disgrace” and accused Europeans of disrespecting the president of a friendly nation.

Another outrageously claimed that a naked Trump statue in Europe was somehow hypocritical and imagined the uproar if Trump displayed a naked Angela Merkel statue in the White House.

A third simply posted:

“I am ASHAMED of the European Parliament. You are disgusting.”

The White House has not publicly responded to the sculpture.

Given how quickly Trump usually lashes out when he feels mocked, that silence is certainly interesting.

What do you think? Is “Orange Plague” legitimate political satire, or did the artist go too far?

Trump's penchant for statues is inspiring less favorable monuments including this one celebrating his lifelong friendship with Jeffrey Epstein.

Tuesday, October 13, 2026

Now it's Trump who has no cards to play on Ukraine

President Donald Trump and Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy shake hands while meeting during the United Nations General Assembly, Tuesday, Sept. 22, 2026, at the UN headquarters. (AP Photo/Julia Demaree Nikhinson)
President Donald Trump and Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelenskyy shake hands while meeting during the United Nations General Assembly on Sept. 22.AP

Oil deal with Russia betrays Zelensky and NATO allies 

President Donald Trump is in a predicament. His party is headed toward potentially historic losses in the midterm elections, fueled largely by anger over his pro-inflation policies, including tariffs on allies, deportations of immigrant workers, and his misbegotten war against Iran.

And few things illustrate the damage better than soaring diesel prices, now averaging over $6.25 a gallon nationwide, according to AAA.

The data is clear on what’s driving those prices:

Russia struck first, destabilizing global energy markets with its misbegotten invasion of its neighbor Ukraine, and then that idiot Trump followed suit four years later with his own disastrous war against Iran.

The result has been a global energy crisis, with diesel shortages driving up the costs of everything from trucking and farming to manufacturing and food production. And voters are understandably furious.

Trump’s desperation is now clear, having finally punched through the things he truly cares about, like building arches and reflecting pools and cutting down hundreds of trees in defiance of court orders. He needs something, anything, to deflect blame for fuel prices before Election Day.

And so he concocted what he thought was a foolproof plan.

You see, he could openly shift American policy toward supporting his pal Vladimir Putin, the dictator of Russia, while pretending he was delivering lower fuel prices to American voters!

A residential building burns following a Russian air attack in Kharkiv, Ukraine, Monday, Oct. 12, 2026. (AP Photo/Andrii Marienko)
A residential building burns following a Russian air attack in Kharkiv, Ukraine, on Oct. 12.AP

And so, just weeks after signing the “Lindsey O. Graham Sanctioning Russia and Iran Act of 2026,” which the White House itself noted “authorizes and expands statutory sanctions, tariffs, and prohibitions on Russia and extends existing sanctions on Iran,” Trump went ahead and undermined the very purpose of that law.

He announced that he had negotiated a deal with Putin to supply Russian diesel to the American and global markets, with his administration temporarily lifting sanctions to make it happen.

And what a deal it was!

Russia would initially supply 300,000 metric tons of diesel, followed by another 500,000 tons in November, another million tons after that, and potentially another 3 million tons down the road.

Sounds like a lot, right?

That initial shipment amounts to roughly 14 hours of American diesel consumption. The first three shipments combined would cover about three and a half days. Even if every promised and conditional shipment materialized, the grand total would amount to less than 10 days of American consumption, not enough to affect global prices, not even at the margins.

And that’s assuming Russia had diesel to spare, which it doesn’t! In Trump’s Truth Social post announcing the agreement, he specifically notes that future Russian supply would be “based on the condition of their Diesel Refineries.” This is key because Russia’s refineries are, in large part, burning from Ukrainian long-range drone strikes, so much so that Russia previously banned diesel exports, unable to supply its own domestic supply, but it has been importing diesel from countries like Iran and South Korea. 

Trump doesn’t care about any of that. What matters to him is that 1) he could finally align U.S. policy alongside fascist Russia, and—this is particularly important—2) he could now blame Ukraine for high diesel prices. And his surrogates spent the weekend doing just that. 

Trump and Putin are fuming about Ukraine because their refinery strikes have emerged as one of its most effective weapons against Russia’s war machine. They damage Russia’s ability to fuel its military, disrupt its domestic economy, and deprive the Kremlin of revenue it needs to continue its invasion.

So for Trump’s diesel deal to work, he needs Ukraine to stop doing one of the things that is actually working against Russia. 

And of course, Trump is siding with Russia, thinking he has a winner—able to blame Ukraine for his own failures, while shifting public sentiment against Ukraine in the process. 

Not a lot of people bought it. Condemnation was fierce both internationally and from both sides of the political aisle here in the U.S. The administration was in immediate damage-control mode, whining that it was all the fault of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. 

People watch Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on a large screen as he speaks to the Warsaw Security Forum in Warsaw, Poland, Monday, Oct. 12, 2026. (AP Photo/Attila Husejnow)
People watch Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on a large screen as he speaks to the Warsaw Security Forum, in Poland, on Oct. 12.AP

“President Trump decided to make a diesel fuel deal with Russia after Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky ignored half a dozen U.S. requests to stop attacking Russian oil refineries, a U.S. official with direct knowledge told Axios,” the publication reported.

That official further whined, “Zelensky is misreading the room. By continuing to hit refineries, he is eroding the good will that he has built with Trump over the last six months.”

Actually, it’s Trump misreading the room. There was no “good will” with Trump. The U.S. side has spent the last year and a half stringing Ukraine along with promises to share schematics of U.S. Patriot air-defense missiles and other aid that never shows. There are still millions in Ukraine aid that Congress authorized that Trump has refused to hand over. 

And with that, Trump has given up much of the leverage he had over Ukraine. This hasn’t been lost on anyone on the other side of the Atlantic, with European allies working to replace American military assistance and intelligence capabilities. France has announced that it now provides two-thirds of Ukraine’s intelligence needs. 

Trump has seemingly lost his last card to play. It makes it easy when the U.S. tries to pressure them directly, as they were this weekend demanding Europe stop helping Ukraine.  

So Ukraine is now emboldened to chart its own course on the war. 

Shortly before Trump announced his oil deal with Russia, Ukraine launched a massive strike against several Russian refineries, with Zelenskyy himself triumphantly announcing the actions. And even after Trump announced his deal with Putin, reports popped up of a new Ukrainian attack on an oil facility in Rostov-on-Don, in Russia

Then on Sunday, Trump declared an “ENERGY CEASEFIRE” between Ukraine and Russia—only, according to Ukraine, the ceasefire was news to them. Of course, there was no energy ceasefire. It was Trump screaming into Truth Social in rage, thinking that his words can shape reality. 

Zelenskyy did say he’d be happy to agree to an energy ceasefire if Russia also agreed, but then he noted that Monday morning, Russia hit energy infrastructure. 

Somehow, no one is expecting Trump to scream at his buddy Putin in response. 

So to recap: 

Trump’s war against Iran helped create a global energy crisis that is hammering American consumers and threatening Republican electoral prospects. 

Desperate to lower diesel prices, Trump turned to Putin, undermining American sanctions against Russia in exchange for relatively small and uncertain quantities of fuel.

But Russia’s ability to deliver that fuel depends on refineries that Ukraine has been systematically destroying. 

So Trump announced a ceasefire on energy infrastructure that neither side had demonstrably agreed to.

This is what happens when a president believes that declaring something makes it true. Election Day can’t get here soon enough.

Donnie and Putey: Back in bed together.
 

Monday, October 12, 2026

Melania, Natalie Harp and the strange triangle in Trump's White House

"An optics problem that could have been predicted by a five-year-old with a smartphone."

There are presidential marriages.

And then there is Donald and Melania Trump.

Their relationship has always operated according to a peculiar choreography: proximity without constant intimacy, public appearances without the conventional performance of marital unity, affection mixed with distance, and an extraordinary ability to make the absence of one spouse more interesting than the presence of most politicians.

Now the choreography has produced another episode.

Donald Trump went to Ireland.

Melania stayed home.

And Natalie Harp went with him.

That is the sort of coincidence that makes the Washington gossip industry reach for its oxygen tank.

The facts are straightforward. Melania Trump did not accompany her husband on his September visit to Ireland. Trump himself joked about the absence, saying she was “with him in spirit” and suggesting that she did not want to endure the seven-hour flight. He also joked about whether she was sufficiently sociable.

Then there was another conspicuous absence.

Melania also skipped the Republican Party's extraordinary midterm convention in Dallas the previous week. Her spokesman confirmed that she would instead attend a White House Historical Association event in Washington.

That is unusual.

But it is not unprecedented enough to prove a marital crisis.

Melania has never behaved like the stereotypical American political spouse. She has maintained a much lower public profile than many first ladies, including during major political events. In other words, her absence is newsworthy, but it is not evidence by itself of anything sinister.

Then comes Natalie Harp.

Harp is not some random blonde who wandered into Air Force One's orbit.

She is Donald Trump's executive assistant and one of the president's most trusted aides. She has become unusually visible around him, particularly in his communications operation, and her closeness to Trump has generated speculation for months.

Reuters recently reported that Trump gave Harp a $45,000 cash Christmas gift in 2025, alongside two other close aides, Margo Martin and Chamberlain Harris. The payments have already generated an ethics debate over whether federal employees can properly receive such personal compensation from the president. The White House says the gifts were personal and unrelated to official duties.

So yes, there is something objectively unusual here.

Harp is extraordinarily close to the president.

She is extraordinarily loyal to him.

She is unusually visible.

She has accompanied him on politically and personally significant trips.

And now she was in Ireland while the first lady was not.

But then comes the part where journalism and gossip part company.

There is no established evidence that Trump and Harp are having a sexual relationship.

None.

There are rumors.

There are stories about the unusual intensity of their professional relationship.

There are accounts describing Harp as deeply devoted to Trump.

There are reports about private access.

There are alleged letters.

There are endless photographs and videos.

There is an entire cottage industry dedicated to interpreting every glance between the president and his assistant.

But none of that establishes an affair.

Indeed, the most interesting development of the past few days is that Melania's own senior adviser, Marc Beckman, publicly pushed back against the speculation, describing Harp as hardworking and loyal and dismissing the rumors about her relationship with Trump.

That does not prove that everything is fine.

It proves something much simpler:

the White House knows the rumor exists.

And that matters because political optics are sometimes more powerful than facts.

Imagine the photograph.

The president travels overseas.

His wife stays home.

The president's young female executive assistant travels with him.

The White House then becomes irritated when journalists notice.

This is not evidence of adultery.

It is, however, an optics problem that could have been predicted by a five-year-old with a smartphone.

And Trump himself does not exactly make things easier.

Instead of providing a boring explanation, he jokes.

Melania does not want the seven-hour flight.

She is watching from home.

She is there “in spirit.”

Perhaps that is simply Trump being Trump.

Probably.

But political communication is not evaluated according to intentions alone. It is evaluated according to what people see.

And what people see is a president increasingly surrounded by a small circle of intensely loyal aides, one of whom happens to have become a persistent subject of speculation.

The story becomes even more interesting because Harp's relationship with Trump is not merely professional in the ordinary sense.

She has long been one of his most devoted defenders.

Her public profile rose after she credited Trump with helping her access experimental medical treatment under the Right to Try law. She subsequently became a Trump loyalist, worked in conservative media, joined his political operation and eventually became an executive assistant in the White House.

Michael Wolff and other journalists have described her as an unusually important gatekeeper around Trump. Reports have also described concerns among other aides about the degree of access she possesses. Those reports are about political proximity, not proof of a sexual affair.

And that distinction should remain intact.

Because the easiest thing in the world is to turn a powerful man's female aide into the “mistress” of the story.

It requires almost no evidence.

A photograph.

A smile.

A trip.

A rumor.

A blonde woman standing near a powerful man.

Suddenly the entire narrative writes itself.

But the real story may actually be more interesting.

What does it mean when a president develops an inner circle in which personal loyalty becomes almost as important as institutional hierarchy?

That is the question worth asking.

Harp's importance is not necessarily that she may or may not be sleeping with Trump.

It is that she appears to occupy an unusually intimate position in the president's political ecosystem.

And that has consequences regardless of what happens in the bedroom.

If an aide can influence what information reaches the president, what messages he sees, which stories he encounters, which people obtain access to him and how he responds to criticism, that person possesses political power.

No affair is necessary.

No scandal is necessary.

Power is enough.

And this is where Melania's absence becomes politically interesting without requiring us to invent a marital drama.

The first lady has built her own role.

It is deliberately limited.

She chooses when to appear.

She chooses when not to appear.

She does not seem particularly interested in playing the traditional political wife who stands beside her husband at every rally, every convention and every foreign trip.

That may be frustrating to the White House.

It may be perfectly acceptable to her.

It may even be part of the arrangement between the Trumps.

We simply do not know.

What we do know is that the visual contrast has become impossible to miss.

Melania disappears.

Natalie appears.

And the president jokes about it.

That is enough to generate headlines.

The internet will do the rest.

And the irony is that Melania's own representatives have now been forced to defend the very aide whose proximity to her husband is generating the speculation.

That is almost comically Trumpian.

The first lady is not traveling with the president.

The aide is.

The rumor machine starts.

The first lady's adviser responds.

And everybody insists that there is nothing to see.

Perhaps there really is nothing to see.

That remains the responsible conclusion.

But there is another lesson here.

The Trump White House has never been a normal political institution.

It is intensely personalized.

Trump's political world revolves around loyalty, access and proximity. The people who can get into the room matter enormously. The people who can get his attention matter even more.

Natalie Harp appears to understand that ecosystem exceptionally well.

Whether she is a loyal employee, an unusually devoted political disciple, a powerful gatekeeper or some combination of all three is a legitimate subject for political reporting.

Whether she is Trump's secret lover is, at this point, gossip.

And there is a difference.

The temptation to turn every powerful woman near a powerful man into a sexual story is almost as old as politics itself.

But there is a more modern question hiding underneath it:

Why does this particular aide have so much access?

That question can be investigated.

It can be documented.

It can be answered with emails, schedules, appointments, official records, financial disclosures and testimony.

An alleged affair cannot be established by body language.

And if there really is nothing between Trump and Harp beyond an unusually close professional relationship, the political implications may actually be more significant.

Because then the story is not about sex.

It is about access.

And in a presidency built around one man's personality, access is power.

As for Melania, perhaps she really did look at the itinerary, see seven hours of flight time and decide that Ireland could survive without her.

Perhaps she simply prefers her own space.

Perhaps she had other priorities.

Or perhaps, as the gossip columns desperately want us to believe, something much more complicated is happening behind the walls of Mar-a-Lago and the White House.

There is only one honest answer today: we do not know.

But we do know this.

Donald Trump went to Ireland.

Melania Trump stayed home.

Natalie Harp went with him.

And that photograph is going to generate considerably more questions than the seven-hour flight ever will.

Cesio Endrizzi 


//

Putin Has Trump Right Where He Wants Him

  President's outright betrayal of Ukraine shows the U.S. is in a precarious position       Heather Digby Parton / ...