Thursday, February 12, 2026

Pam Bondi's Outrageous Tirade from Three Different Vantage Points

(GAZETTE BLOG EDITOR'S NOTE: In case you missed Attorney General Pam Bondi's beyond the pale performance before a House committee Wednesday, the Gazette Blog hereby proudly presents the lowlights from three uniquely different vantage points:)

1: Pam Bondi is performing for an audience of one

no image description available
Attorney General Pam Bondi testifies before a House Judiciary Committee hearing on Feb. 11.

Attorney General Pam Bondi on Wednesday gave one of the most dreadful congressional hearing performances any Cabinet-level official has ever given, ranting like a lunatic and hurling personal insults at Democratic lawmakers rather than answering fair questions about the horrific conduct the Department of Justice has exhibited both under her watch and at her direction.

If they tuned in, normal Americans who do not live their lives in terminally online right-wing media circles likely watched her embarrassing antics and wondered what on earth she was trying to accomplish.

Cartoon by Mike Luckovich

But the answer is simple: She was trying to appease President Donald Trump, who gets perverse pleasure from insulting his perceived enemies.

In fact, Bondi's histrionics may have been an effort to save her own skin. Despite her corrupt attempts to weaponize the DOJ to Trump's liking, the department has failed to notch a single notable victory in Trump's vindictive prosecution attempts. It has reportedly led Trump to grow disillusioned with Bondi, to whom he once mistakenly posted a message on Truth Social complaining about her lack of results.

At one point, Bondi ridiculously called Trump "the most transparent president in the nation's history," even as he withholds countless documents on Jeffrey Epstein that he's legally obligated to release due to legislation passed last year. Instead, Bondi said Democrats were just trying to distract from the stock market.

"The Dow is over 50,000! I don't know why you're laughing. You're a great stock trader, as I hear, Raskin," Bondi screamed at Maryland Democratic Rep. Jamie Raskin, who was likely laughing at how absurd she sounded as she tried to evade his questions. "The Dow is over 50,000 right now. The S&P [500] at almost 7,000, and the Nasdaq smashing records. That's what we should be talking about."

Of course, the hearing’s topic was "Oversight of the Justice Department," which has nothing to do with the stock market. But Dear Leader Trump loves to brag about stock gains, so Bondi did just that.

Or how about this brown-nosing remark, in which she demanded all of the Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee apologize for impeachment hearings against Trump. 

“Have you apologized to President Trump?” she said. “Have you apologized to President Trump, all of you who participated in those impeachment proceedings against Donald Trump? You all should be apologizing. You sit here, and you attack the president, and I am not going to have it. I'm not going to put up with it."

Yeah, we all know who that insane act was for.

Bondi also refused to apologize to Epstein survivors, who at one point raised their hands when asked if they felt they’d been ignored by the DOJ. 

The refusal to apologize likely appeased Trump, who never apologizes for his conduct, no matter how despicable. But the image of her refusing to even look at the victims likely gave Democrats more ammo for attack ads during the upcoming midterm elections. 

Then there were the insults.

Bondi refused to answer how many of Epstein’s co-conspirators she’s indicted. Instead, she yelled that Raskin is a “washed-up loser lawyer.” Totally normal stuff.

She accused Republican Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky—who successfully passed a law that required Bondi to release the Epstein files—a “failed politician” who suffers from “Trump Derangement Syndrome.” Of course, if anyone has Trump Derangement Syndrome, it’s Bondi, whose ass-kissing of Trump is so over the top that it’s vomit inducing.

"She didn't answer anything," Massie told reporters after he tried to get answers from Bondi during the hearing but was instead met with personal insults. "She came here ready to talk about the Dow Jones and the Nasdaq, which seems kind of crazy to me."


no image description available 
Rep. Thomas Massie questions Attorney General Pam Bondi as she testifies before a House Judiciary Committee oversight hearing on Capitol Hill on Feb. 11.

During a recess from Attorney General Pam Bondi’s chaotic testimony in front of the House Judiciary Committee Wednesday, GOP Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky spoke with reporters about how he thought the hearing was going. 

“She didn't answer anything,” Massie said in the hallway, after Bondi was peppered with questions about the notorious Epstein files. “She came here just ready to talk about the Dow Jones and the NASDAQ, which seems kind of crazy to me.”

Massie—a problematic ally for Democrats as of late—has been exceptionally dogged in his pursuit of accountability for the victims of accused sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. The outspoken Republican told reporters that Bondi can behave as erratically as she wants, but that there will ultimately be a reckoning.


Related | Pam Bondi loses her sh-t at Epstein hearing


“The recourse, and I keep reminding the folks at DOJ of this—is that the next attorney general can bring charges against them for breaking the law,” Massie said. “I think that's what's compelled them to produce 3 million documents and now they're claiming that it's incompetence. Like their defense today is incompetence for why they haven't given us all of the documents they should, why they have over-redacted in the case of coconspirators, and why they failed to redact the names of the victims.” 

Bondi flipped out any time she was pressed on the Department of Justice’s handling of the Epstein files, whose release was mandated by a Congressional vote. 

Her bizarre defensiveness wasn’t limited to questioning from Democrats. During one exchange, Bondi accused Massie of having “Trump Derangement Syndrome,” and dismissed him as “a failed politician." 

3. Pam Bondi loses her sh-t at Epstein hearing

281
Comments
271 New
U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi testifies before the House Judiciary Committee on February 11, 2026 in Washington, D.C. Bondi is facing criticism over the Department of Justice's handling of the release of the Epstein files. (Photo by Samuel Corum/Sipa USA)(Sipa via AP Images)
Attorney General Pam Bondi testifies before the House Judiciary Committee on Feb. 11.

Attorney General Pam Bondi’s appearance before the House Judiciary Committee on Wednesday went off the rails shortly after Democratic Rep. Pramila Jayapal of Washington asked Jeffrey Epstein’s survivors in the audience to raise their hands. Jayapal pressed Bondi to apologize to them, accusing her of protecting “powerful predators” in the release of Epstein-related files while also failing to safeguard survivors in the documents.

“Congresswoman, you sat before—former Attorney General] Merrick Garland sat in this chair twice,” Bondi said. 

“Attorney General Bondi,” Jayapal interrupted.

“Can I finish my answer?” Bondi said. 

“No,” Jayapal shot back. “I'm gonna reclaim my time because I asked you a specific question that I would like you to answer, which is: Will you turn to the survivors? This is not about anybody that came before you.” 

Things didn’t get any better as other Democrats on the committee asked Bondi to defend the criminally slow rollout of the Epstein files. Trying to deflect, Bondi lied about the findings of former special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election. She also falsely claimed that President Donald Trump “overwhelmingly” won “the majority” of the popular vote in 2024. In reality, he won 49.7% of the vote.

She also brought up … the stock market?

“The Dow is over 50,000! I don't know why you're laughing,” Bondi said during one extensive detour. “The Dow is over 50,000 right now. The S&P [500] at almost 7,000, and the Nasdaq smashing records. … That's what we should be talking about."

Rep. Jamie Raskin of Maryland, the top Democrat on the committee, repeatedly asked Chair Jim Jordan to remind the attorney general to stop ranting through members' questions.

It seems that when Trump’s Cabinet officials aren’t defending their appearances in the Epstein files, they are scrambling to cover for their powerful friends.

Sourpuss is putting it oh so kindly.  Suck-up sycophant says it so much better.

Wednesday, February 11, 2026

Bad Bunny’s Super Bowl Halftime Show Was Political Art at Its Best

 Bad Bunny’s Super Bowl Show Was Political Art at Its Best 

Bad Bunny’s performance at the Super Bowl was a gesture of defiance toward the xenophobia of Donald Trump’s base and a US government that dehumanizes Latin Americans. (photo: Kevin Sabitus/Getty Images)

 
  
Bad Bunny presented a Grammy to this young boy during his Super Bpwl halftime show, an act that reminds young people they too can achieve whatever they put their minds to. 
 
 It’s no wonder Donald Trump was enraged. The creativity of Bad Bunny's music is an indictment of MAGA’s schlock-filled cultural wasteland.
 
Cruz Bonlarron Martínez / Jacobin  
"The Super Bowl Halftime Show is absolutely terrible, one of the worst, EVER! It makes no sense, is an affront to the Greatness of America, and doesn’t represent our standards of Success, Creativity, or Excellence. Nobody understands a word this guy is saying, and the dancing is disgusting, especially for young children that are watching from throughout the U.S.A., and all over the World. This “Show” is just a “slap in the face” to our Country, which is setting new standards and records every single day — including the Best Stock Market and 401(k)s in History! There is nothing inspirational about this mess of a Halftime Show and watch, it will get great reviews from the Fake News Media, because they haven’t got a clue of what is going on in the REAL WORLD." 

On Sunday night, millions of people across the United States and throughout Latin America tuned in to watch the National Football League’s (NFL) Super Bowl LX. Many of them were less interested in the game itself than in the highly anticipated halftime show of Puerto Rican pop king Bad Bunny.

Bad Bunny is the stage name of Benito Martínez Ocasio, who won the Grammy for best album the previous week. He delivered a show that lived up to the hype, speaking exclusively in Spanish and went through the major hits of his 2025 album, DeBÍ TiRAR MáS FOToS (“I Should Have Taken More Photos”), with an aesthetic evoking Puerto Rico and the island’s working-class New York diaspora.

Through the lyrics of his song “Lo Qué Le Pasó a Hawaii,” he used the platform to openly criticize US colonialism in Puerto Rico and he offered an ode to Puerto Rican working-class migrants with “NUEVAYoL.” Bad Bunny, surrounded by flags from throughout the continent, ended by saying “God Bless America” and then shouted out the names of every country in the Americas in true Bolivarian fashion.

The most political act was the performance in itself, a gesture of defiance toward the xenophobia of Donald Trump’s base and a US government that dehumanizes Latin Americans every chance it gets. 

Martínez Ocasio used the quintessential US sporting event to openly criticize an administration that has further militarized the US colony of Puerto Rico in order to attack other Latin American nations while continuing to deny Puerto Ricans the right to decide their future.

It’s no wonder that the halftime show enraged Trump, who took to his social media platform, Truth Social, to say that it was “absolutely terrible, one of the worst, EVER!” 

The US president, whose name appears in recent Department of Justice emails related to the notorious pedophile Jeffery Epstein, claimed that the dancing was “disgusting, especially for young children that are watching from throughout the USA,” and described Bad Bunny’s performance as a “’slap in the face’ to our Country.”

(TRUMP'S ENTIRE POST: "The Super Bowl Halftime Show is absolutely terrible, one of the worst, EVER! It makes no sense, is an affront to the Greatness of America, and doesn’t represent our standards of Success, Creativity, or Excellence. Nobody understands a word this guy is saying, and the dancing is disgusting, especially for young children that are watching from throughout the U.S.A., and all over the World. This “Show” is just a “slap in the face” to our Country, which is setting new standards and records every single day — including the Best Stock Market and 401(k)s in History! There is nothing inspirational about this mess of a Halftime Show and watch, it will get great reviews from the Fake News Media, because they haven’t got a clue of what is going on in the REAL WORLD.")

Working-Class Hero

While Bad Bunny’s voice can now be heard in every corner of the globe, from senior centers in China to nightclubs in Scandinavia, barely a decade ago, he was working as a grocery store bagger in the town of Vega Baja (the supermarket where he worked has now become a tourist destination). Around the same time, he began his music career in the field of Latin trap, a genre that reflected the realities of working-class life for Puerto Ricans and Latinos in the United States.

Alternating between the hyperrealism of stories about quick money through drug dealing, crude sexual references, and fantasies of grandeur, Martínez Ocasio’s early lyrics were often similar to those of many others in the genre at the time like Anuel AA, Farruko, or Ñengo Flow. But his mastery of wit and subtle cultural references set him apart, evoking memories of reggaeton’s golden age in the early 2000s.

Bad Bunny’s rise in popularity also coincided with one of the most important events in recent Puerto Rican history, Hurricane Maria. The Category 5 hurricane touched down in Puerto Rico on September 20, 2017. It destroyed homes and infrastructure throughout the country, leaving the vast majority of the population without power for the weeks and months following. The incompetence of the delayed federal response to the hurricane, which left at least 4,645 people dead, exposed Puerto Rico’s colonial status to the world, including many US Americans who were unaware of their country’s colonial possession in the Caribbean.

Shortly after the hurricane, and Trump’s infamous visit to the island where he threw a roll of paper towels at a crowd, Bad Bunny made an appearance at a benefit concert wearing a T-shirt that said: “¿Tú eres tuitero o eres presidente?” (“Are you a Twitter troll or president?”). The font harkened back to the reggaetonero Residente’s multiple T-shirts calling for the independence of Puerto Rico and supporting progressive causes in Latin America a few years earlier.

This was a risky move for an artist who was just beginning to take off. It marked the start of the increasing politicization of Bad Bunny’s career. In July 2018, Martínez Ocasio released the song “Estamos Bien,” a ubiquitous anthem implicitly referring to Hurricane Maria. He appeared on The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon and condemned the continued abandonment of Puerto Rico by the federal government and the administration of then-governor Ricky Rosselló.

The Organic Intellectual

Bad Bunny’s performance on Jimmy Fallon and his willingness to speak out against US colonialism marked a turning point in both his career and political development. It was a step in his conversion into what Antonio Gramsci called the organic intellectual, a thinker who emerges from the masses to challenge the hegemony of the ruling classes. In summer 2019, there was a scandal after a series of chat messages revealed that Rosselló and his administration had been making fun of those who died in the hurricane. This led Puerto Rico to erupt in protests. Bad Bunny was on the front lines, calling for the governor to resign.

In 2022, Martínez Ocasio released the song “El Apagón” (“The Blackout”) in his album Un Verano Sin Ti (“A Summer Without You”). It criticized the US response to Hurricane Maria, the ongoing gentrification of the island, and the privatization of the state power company, which has led to frequent blackouts on the island. The song was accompanied by a short documentary about the negative effects of gentrification featuring the independent Puerto Rican journalist Bianca Graulau.

With the release of his 2025 album, DtMF, Bad Bunny solidified his role as an organic intellectual of the Caribbean and Latin American diaspora in the United States. The album was explicitly political, with many of the songs incorporating anti-colonial themes.

In “LA MuDANZA,” for example, Martínez Ocasio shows his support for independence with the lyrics “Y pongan un tema mío el día que traigan a Hostos, en la caja, la bandera azul clarito” (“Put one of my songs on when they bring back Hostos, in the coffin, with a light-blue flag”). This is a reference to the Puerto Rican independence leader Eugenio María de Hostos, who is buried in the Dominican Republic. Before his death in 1903, he requested that his body be returned when Puerto Rico was free. The “light-blue flag” is the symbol of independence — the same one that Martínez Ocasio used at the Super Bowl.

Martínez Ocasio also took the opportunity to raise awareness about the threat posed by the relocation of US Americans to the island by including a short film, codirected with the Puerto Rican director Arí Maniel Cruz. The film presents a dystopian future where Puerto Ricans have turned into a minority in their own country, displaced by Anglo-Americans. Martínez Ocasio also released YouTube videos to accompany the album’s songs with information about Puerto Rican history created by Jorell Meléndez-Badillo, a Puerto Rican historian and author of the critically acclaimed book Puerto Rico: A National History.

With his Super Bowl performance, Martínez Ocasio has solidified his role as one of the primary figures opposing Trump’s agenda on the global stage. His unapologetic deployment of Pan-American nationalism, at a time when many are retreating into submission to the “Donroe Doctrine,” is a vital rallying cry for resistance. His popularity is also bringing new life to the independence movement in Puerto Rico and shows that despite the difficulties of the world’s current geopolitical environment, we may see independence and true liberation in our lifetimes.

  

Trump called the female dancers in Bad Bunny's halftime show "disgusting."  Pictured above is a dancer performing at Mar a Lago where your president regularly employs scantily clad women to perform for his elite friends.  Double standard?

Monday, February 9, 2026

Trump dedicates National Prayer Breakfast to his favorite god—himself

 no image description available

Nothing says "prayer" like pushing election conspiracies and bragging about human rights violations.

President Donald Trump delivered remarks at the 74th annual National Prayer Breakfast on Thursday, bringing his familiar brand of Christian Nationalism infused with his megalomania and persecution complex.

Trump wandered through a series of babbling claims, boasting about saving the word “Christmas” and taking digs at the press. 

“I can never get a fair break from the fake news,” Trump complained, scolding the media for failing to appreciate what he called a “joke” he made last fall about not being heaven bound. “I really think I probably should make it. I mean, I'm not a perfect candidate, but I did a hell of a lot of good for perfect people.” 

Trump also greeted visiting leaders from around the world, singling out El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele. He boasted about sending immigrants to the country’s CECOT prison—which is criticized for its plethora of human rights abuses—and marveled at how “long and big” it is.

“You're gonna walk away and say ‘he's the meanest son of a gun I've ever seen,’ but I’m not,” Trump said.

And it wouldn’t be a Trump speech without revisiting his lie that he won the 2020 presidential election.

“They rigged the second election,” Trump said. “I had to win it. I had to win it. I needed it for my own ego. I would have had a bad ego for the rest of my life. Now I really have a big ego.”


Saturday, February 7, 2026

The Real Reason ICE Agents Wear Masks

 The Real Reason ICE Agents Wear Masks 

"Masked men with guns are swarming through American cities." (photo: Andrea Renault/STAR MAX/IPx/AP)

Face coverings work less to protect federal agents from danger than to make it easier for them to do unconstitutional things. 
 
Adam Serwer / The Atlantic  


Masked men with guns are swarming through American cities. They are doing so in the name of enforcing immigration law. There is no justification, however, for federal agents to hide their identity from the public that pays for their weapons.

In an interview with CNN, Thom Tillis, the Republican senator from North Carolina, who has become an occasional Trump critic, said that he didn’t have a problem with federal agents wearing masks. “I’ve seen people dox me. I’ve seen people take pictures and identify law-enforcement officers and then put their families at risk,” Tillis said. Requiring agents to take off, or even pull down, their mask, he suggested, would endanger their safety—“I think that’s a step too far.”

Doxxing—which traditionally means the public exposure of an ordinary person’s identity and home address, and threats that harassment or even violence will follow that exposure—is a common technique in online bullying. Although exposing someone’s home address is clearly menacing, the concept of “doxxing” cannot apply to simply knowing the identity of public-facing government employees, especially not those empowered to use force.

Tillis’s logic illustrates how distorted the American approach to law enforcement has become. 

Police officers are civilians; they are public servants, not above the public. It is part of the job of police—and, for that matter, politicians—to be identifiable, because of the profound authority bestowed upon them. The ability to use force is a weighty responsibility, requiring high standards of conduct, and it can and should be revoked when abused. 

It is not “doxxing” federal agents for the public to know who they are. We are supposed to know who they are, because that is how we hold them accountable. This is why police officers wear visible badge numbers and name tags. The responsibilities they are given are not compatible with anonymity.

Ordinary police officers do not wear masks except in extremely rare and specific circumstances. This is the case even though, statistically, regular police officers are at far greater risk than immigration agents. According to an analysis by Alex Nowrasteh at the Cato Institute based on data from last year, “law enforcement officers who don’t work at ICE or Border Patrol have a death rate 6.3 times higher than that of immigration enforcement officers.” In fact, the report found, immigration agents are at no greater risk than regular people: “The chance of an ICE or Border Patrol agent being murdered in the line of duty is about one in 94,549 per year, about 5.5 times less likely than a civilian being murdered.”

If there were law-enforcement agencies particularly ill-suited to anonymity, it would be Customs and Border Protection and the Border Patrol. From 2005 to 2024, nearly 5,000 CBP and Border Patrol officers were arrested, according to the journalist Garrett Graff, who testified about his findings to an accountability commission set up by the governor of Illinois. 

Information on the multitude of corruption-related charges faced by agents can be found on the CBP’s own website. “The crime rate of CBP agents and offices was higher PER CAPITA than the crime rate of undocumented immigrants in the United States,” Graff writes.” Statistically speaking, “worst of the worst” seems to describe CBP and the Border Patrol as law-enforcement agencies better than it does the people they’re rounding up.

ICE does not have the same history of criminal behavior, but it does share a long record of abusing its powers and mistreating people in its custody. Put succinctly, these agencies deal with people the American system has frequently treated as barely human. Now these agents have been unleashed on Americans. Putting masks on people in agencies with internal cultures like these was always a recipe for catastrophe. 

The Trump administration took the most corrupt, poorly trained, and impulsive law-enforcement agencies in the country, gave them masks, and turned them against American cities.

Politicians, likewise, do not cover their faces, though death threats—which should have no place in public discourse—have become far more common. It would nonetheless be absurd to conceal lawmakers’ identity, because then people would not know whom to hold responsible for public policy. Lawmakers do not vote by secret ballot, because they would be able to ignore popular preferences without fearing any consequences. That applies as much to police as it does to politicians. 

The public has a right to know the identity of the people who wield power in their name, so that they can withdraw that power from those who abuse or misuse it. If people can wield power over life and death without showing their face, we have a gang of criminals—not a police force.

The unhinged behavior that we have seen from federal immigration officials, including the killings of Renee Good and Alex Pretti, who were shot while drawing attention to or recording agents’ behavior, is a direct consequence of power without accountability. 

On Sunday, ProPublica revealed the names of the two agents involved in the Pretti shooting: Border Patrol officer Jesus Ochoa and Customs and Border Protection officer Raymundo Gutierrez. Suffice it to say that two Hispanic Americans killing a white person trying to prevent them from harassing or deporting other Hispanic people, on the orders of Stephen Miller—a Jewish American whose ancestors fled pogroms in Eastern Europe—is a uniquely grotesque expression of the American melting pot in action.

Although the Department of Justice reversed course on Friday and promised an actual investigation of Pretti’s killing, President Trump has already eliminated traditional restraints on political control over criminal prosecutions and investigations, and Trump officials have already declared Pretti to be a terrorist and his killers to be innocent. Other Trump officials have loudly announced that federal agents have “absolute immunity” in the execution of their duties. Legal immunity plus anonymity equals impunity. It would be logical to think that in that situation, agents could literally get away with murder.

But the consequences of masked immigration agents’ extreme behavior go beyond those two fatal shootings. Thousands of students in the Twin Cities have stopped going to school and are in hiding with their families. The great majority of Somali and Hispanic residents of the Twin Cities area have legal status, but that seems to make no difference: Federal agents are indiscriminately stopping, detaining, and arresting people on the basis of little more than their accent or skin color, in violation of their due-process rights, a lawsuit from the ACLU contends. In Salem, Oregon, an American was hospitalized after reportedly being dragged from her car by immigration agents demanding her papers; she is among the dozens of Americans who, ProPublica reported in October, have been physically abused or detained for extended periods by immigration agents. The real number was probably greater then; it is certainly greater now.

Even regular cops are not immune to being profiled by ICE and the Border Patrol. “We’ve had many instances of people being stopped, family members of police officers being stopped that are American citizens,“ Minneapolis Police Chief Brian O’Hara told The New York Times. “They’re not stopping family members of folks who are Norwegian or Irish. That’s not happening.” 

Twin Cities residents being racially profiled by federal agents can thank Supreme Court Justice Brett "I like beer" Kavanaugh, who blew a giant hole in the Fourteenth Amendment in a shadow-docket case in September. A later attempt by Kavanaugh to walk back his disastrous concurrence hasn’t altered federal agents’ conduct.

When violating the Constitution on a daily basis a mask helps, because people who are assured that they won’t face consequences for abusing power almost inevitably do so. One wonders if this is actually the government’s purpose in masking them. 

When you are asking men to essentially make war on their fellow citizens—to force lightly dressed people out into the frigid Minneapolis winter, detain elementary schoolers, follow good Samaritans as they deliver food to hiding families, and drag, tackle, beat, tase, or even shoot American citizens—you may find telling them that they can keep their identity hidden useful. The masks may work less to protect federal agents from danger than to to make it easier for them to do unspeakable things.

Overweight, undertrained, cowardly goons and thugs.

Thursday, February 5, 2026

Newly unmasked evidence shows who put Trump in the White House


Does his fear of exposure by Putin outweigh his loyalty to our nation? 

Alternet 

alternet.org 

Opinion by Thom Hartmann 

The Britih newspaper Daily Mail is out with a deeply researched investigative report, the result of a long collaboration between columnists Glewn Owen and Dan Hodges, along with Mark Hookham (Assistant Editor) and Daisy Graham-Brown (Investigative Reporter). 

It’s shocking in its detail and its implication that Vladimir Putin has basically owned Donald Trump for years, even before Trump ran for president in 2016. 

They note of last week’s partial (about 50 percent) Epstein document release: “The files include 1,056 documents naming Russian President Vladimir Putin and 9,629 referring to Moscow. [Jeffrey] Epstein even seems to have secured audiences with Putin after his 2008 conviction for procuring a child for prostitution.” 

Essentially, they’re arguing that Epstein was running an operation on behalf of the KGB/Putin that lured wealthy and powerful men to Epstein’s New York and Palm Beach mansions and his island where they were surreptitiously filmed having sex with underage girls. That material was then presumably passed along to Putin, who used it for leverage when he needed it: “Intelligence sources believe Epstein was running ‘the world’s largest honeytrap operation’ on behalf of the KGB when he procured women for his network of associates.” 

In return for giving Putin videos of wealthy, famous men in criminally compromising positions, Putin reportedly arranged for massive amounts of corrupt Russian money to be handed to Epstein to launder in the US. Such money typically comes from illicit drug and oil deals, outright theft, sanctions evasions, and Russian organized crime oligarchs (including Putin and his associates) and is frequently laundered in this country using real estate. It’s the Mafia’s favorite, too. 

America has the most lax and largely useless real estate transaction laws in the developed world, so a main way to launder such dirty cash is through cash-based real estate transactions (which are illegal in almost every other developed country). And we know that Trump and his sons, when US and European banks refused to loan him any more money after his multiple bankruptcies, started taking in enough money to ensure the survival of his little real estate empire and it was all coming from Russia. 

As Don Jr. told wealthy attendees to a 2008 real-estate conference: “In terms of high-end product influx into the U.S., Russians make up a pretty disproportionate cross-section of a lot of our assets.” Similarly, Eric Trump told a friend, who later testified about it: “‘Well, we don’t rely on American banks. We have all the funding we need out of Russia.’ I said, ‘Really?’ And he said, ‘Oh, yeah. We’ve got some guys that really, really love golf, and they’re really invested in our programs. We just go there all the time.’” 

This is one of the reasons Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR), the Ranking Democrat on the Senate Finance Committee (that oversees US banking) has been demanding access to Epstein’s finances and even introduced legislation (the Produce Epstein Treasury Records Act) to require that disclosure, which Republicans are currently blocking. 

That alone is worth a call to your two US senators. The documents released last week included a series of email conversations between Epstein and senior European officials close to Putin. This is way beyond Gary Hart and Monkey Business; this is the President of the United States being in the pocket of a foreign power and profiting from it. 

They pretty much openly suggest Epstein knew about ways to “handle” Trump: “Other messages revealed Epstein claimed he could give the Kremlin valuable insight into Mr Trump ahead of a summit with Putin in Helsinki. …“In a June 2018 exchange, Epstein indicated that Vitaly Churkin, Russia’s ambassador to the UN, ‘understood Trump after our conversations.’ … “Earlier that month Epstein had also messaged Steve Bannon, a Trump ally, to tell him Mr Jagland was due to meet Putin and Lavrov and was then staying overnight with him at his mansion in Paris.” [Emphasis added] 

Epstein, of course, died under deeply suspicious circumstances in jail while Trump was president (and now Epstein’s partner in crime, Ghislaine Maxwell, has been moved to a country club type of facility where she reportedly spends the days training puppies). As Republican consultant Harlan Hill noted on Twitter at the time of Epstein’s supposed suicide: “Dead men tell no tales. Just as Jeffrey Epstein starts to name names, he decides to kill himself? Mkay. Totally believable.” 

So, if Epstein had given Putin video of Trump having sex with underage girls, and Trump knows it and has for decades, how might that have changed Trump’s behavior? ・Might it provoke him to hang a photo of Putin in the White House? ・

Or go along with Putin’s daily slaughter of Ukrainian children? 

Give Putin’s top diplomat information that burned a spy and an anti-Russia operation? ・

Tell the world that he trusts Putin over the US intelligence services? ・

Put a Putin-friendly conspiracy fan in charge of all US intelligence? ・

Severely damage NATO, a perpetual thorn in Putin’s side? ・

Shatter our alliances with the EU and other democratic nations in ways that may well last for generations? ・

Refuse to make America’s dues payments to the UN, causing that body to have to shut down, perhaps permanently, this summer? ・

Steal US intelligence secrets, including top-secret nuclear information, and put it in a place where Russian spies or their associates can easily access and photocopy it? ・

Unleash ICE in a way that turns Americans against each other leading to the “Second US Civil War” that Russian media and Putin’s #2 man (Medvedev) have been gleefully predicting? ・

Gut America’s soft power around the world by shutting down USAID, leading to the deaths of hundreds of thousands mostly children, in the Third World while opening opportunities for Putin and Xi to pick them up as new alliances? 

In 2019 The Washington Post revealed that, throughout his first presidency, Donald Trump was having secret phone conversations with Putin (over 20 have been identified so far, including one just days before the 2020 election). The Moscow Project from the American Progress Action Fund documents more than 270 known contacts between Russia-linked operatives and members of the Trump campaign and transition team, as well as at least 38 known meetings, all just leading up to the 2016 election. 

The manager of his 2016 campaign, Paul Manafort — who was previously paid tens of millions by Vladimir Putin’s people to install a pro-Putin puppet as Ukraine’s president in 2010 — has admitted that he was regularly feeding secret inside-campaign strategy and polling information to Russian intelligence via the oligarch who typically paid him on their behalf. Throughout the campaign, he regularly let Russia know where Trump needed specific types of help, and how, and when. With that help, an army of bots, shills, and trolls were unleashed on social media to successfully swing the young white male vote toward Trump. 

Trump pardoned Manafort, which got him out of prison. He’s still fabulously rich from his work for Russia and his unpaid efforts to elect Trump. As The New York Times noted in 2020: “[I]nvestigators found enough there to declare that Mr. Manafort created ‘a grave counterintelligence threat’ by sharing inside information about the presidential race with Mr. Kilimnik and the Russian and [pro-Russian] Ukrainian oligarchs whom he served.” 

There is no known parallel to this behavior by any president in American history — one could argue it easily exceeds Benedict Arnold’s audacity — and criminally bringing stolen top secret documents to Mar-a-Lago is just the tip of the iceberg. 

The Washington Post reported that Trump had a habit of carrying top-secret information that could severely damage our national security, leaving it in hotel rooms in hostile nations. Was he bringing these documents with him to sell? Or just to show to leaders or oligarchs in those countries to impress them? Or because Putin told him to? Trump doesn’t put all that effort into hauling things around unless he’s terrified. “Boxes of documents even came with Trump on foreign travel,” The Post noted, “following him to hotel rooms around the world — including countries considered foreign adversaries of the United States.” 

When Robert Mueller’s team tried to investigate Trump’s ties to Russia and his possibly sharing sensitive military information with Putin, they were stonewalled. The Mueller Report identified ten specific instances of Trump trying to obstruct the investigation, including offering the bribe of a pardon to Paul Manafort, asking FBI Director Comey to “go easy” on General Flynn after Flynn’s dinner with Putin, and directing Attorney General Jeff Sessions to limit Mueller’s ability to investigate Trump’s connections to Russia. 

As the Mueller Report noted: “The President launched public attacks on the investigation and individuals involved in it who could possess evidence adverse to the President, while in private the President engaged in a series of targeted efforts to control the investigation.“For instance, the President attempted to remove the Attorney General; he sought to have Attorney General Sessions un-recuse himself and limit the investigation; he sought to prevent public disclosure of information about the June 9, 2016 meeting between Russians and campaign officials; and he used public forums to attack potential witnesses who might offer adverse information and to praise witnesses who declined to cooperate with the government.” It adds, detailing Trump’s specific Obstruction of Justice crimes: “These actions ranged from efforts to remove the Special Counsel and to reverse the effect of the Attorney General’s recusal; to the attempted use of official power to limit the scope of the investigation; to direct and indirect contacts with witnesses with the potential to influence their testimony.” 

There are, after all, credible assertions from American intelligence that when Trump was elected, members of Russian intelligence and Putin’s inner circle were literally partying in Moscow, celebrating a victory they believed they made happen. And apparently Putin and his intelligence operatives had good reason to be popping the champagne in November, 2016. They were quickly paid off in a big way. In his first months in office, Trump outed an Israeli spy to the Russian Ambassador in what he thought was going to be a “secret Oval Office meeting” (the Russians released the photo to the press), resulting in MOSAD having to “burn” that spy. The undercover agent was apparently working in Syria that year against the Russians, who were embroiled in the midst of Assad’s Civil War and indiscriminately bombing Aleppo into rubble (creating a brown-skinned refugee crisis in Europe, which both Putin and Orbán exploited). That, in turn, prompted the CIA to worry that a longtime American spy buried deep in the Kremlin was similarly vulnerable to Trump handing him over to Putin. As CNN noted (when the story leaked two years later): 

“The source was considered the highest level source for the US inside the Kremlin, high up in the national security infrastructure, according to the source familiar with the matter and a former senior intelligence official.“According to CNN’s sources, the spy had access to Putin and could even provide images of documents on the Russian leader’s desk.” The CIA concluded that the risk Trump had burned or was about to burn our spy inside the Kremlin was so great that — at massive loss to US intelligence abilities that may even have otherwise helped forestall the invasion of Ukraine — they pulled our spy out of Russia in the first year of Trump’s presidency, 2017. 

Similarly, when they met in Helsinki on July 16, 2018, Trump and Putin talked in private for several hours and Trump ordered his translators’ notes destroyed; there is also concern that much of their conversation was done out of the hearing of the US’s translator (Putin is fluent in English) who may have been relegated to a distant part of the rather large empty ballroom in which they met. 

The Washington Post reported, after a leak six months later, that when Trump met privately for those two hours with Putin the CIA went into “panic mode.” A US intelligence official told the Post: “There was this gasp’ at the CIA’s Langley, Virginia headquarters. You literally had people in panic mode watching it at Langley. On all floors. Just shock.” 

Three weeks after Trump’s July 16, 2018 meeting with Putin in Helsinki, Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) made a solo trip to Moscow to personally hand-deliver a document or package of documents from Trump to Putin. Its contents are still unknown, although Paul told the press it was a “personal” letter of some sort. Paul has also consistently taken Trump’s and Putin’s side with regard to the Ukraine war: he single-handedly blocked a $40 billion military aid package in the Senate. When the FBI searched Mar-a-Lago, he responded with a call for the repeal of the Espionage Act, which Jack Smith was prepared to charge Trump under. Paul further suggested the FBI may have “planted” Secret documents at Mar-a-Lago. 

Ten days after Paul’s trip to Moscow, The New York Times reported that the CIA was worried because their sources inside Moscow had suddenly “gone silent”: “The full reasons the sources have gone silent are not known,” the Times reported, but Trump having intentionally burned a man working for the FBI — whose job at that time was to find and reveal Russian agents involved in or close to the Trump campaign — may also have had something to do with it: “[C]urrent and former officials said the exposure of sources inside the United States has also complicated matters,” noted the Times. 

“This year, the identity of an F.B.I. informant, Stefan Halper, became public after [Trump-loyal MAGA Republican] House lawmakers sought information on him and the White House allowed the information to be shared. Mr. Halper, an American academic based in Britain, had been sent to talk to Trump campaign advisers who were under F.B.I. scrutiny for their ties to Russia.” 

Things were picking up the following year, in 2019, as Putin was planning his invasion of Ukraine while Trump was preparing for the 2020 election. In July 2019, Trump had conversations with five foreign leaders during and just before a presidential visit that month to Mar-a-Lago; they included Putin and the Emir of Qatar. In one of those conversations, according to a high-level US Intelligence source, Trump “made promises” to a “world leader” that were so alarming it provoked a national security scramble across multiple agencies. As The Washington Post noted in an article titled “Trump’s communications with foreign leader are part of whistleblower complaint that spurred standoff between spy chief and Congress”: 

“Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson determined that the complaint [against Trump] was credible and troubling enough to be considered a matter of ‘urgent concern,’ a legal threshold that requires notification of congressional oversight committees.” 

On the last day of that month, July 31, Trump had another private conversation with Putin. The White House spokespeople told Congress and the press that Trump said that he and Putin discussed “wildfires” and “trade between the nations.” No droids in this car… But the following week, on August 2nd, The Daily Beast’s Betsy Swan reported that Trump had that week asked the Office of the Director of National Intelligence for a list of all its employees (including all our “spies”) who had worked there more than 90 days, and the request had intelligence officials experiencing “disquiet.” Perhaps just by coincidence, months after Trump left office with cases of classified documents, The New York Times ran a story with the headline Captured, Killed or Compromised: C.I.A. Admits to Losing Dozens of Informants: “Top American counterintelligence officials warned every C.I.A. station and base around the world last week,” the Times’ story’s lede began, “about troubling numbers of informants recruited from other countries to spy for the United States being captured or killed, people familiar with the matter said.

“The message, in an unusual top secret cable, said that the C.I.A.’s counterintelligence mission center had looked at dozens of cases in the last several years involving foreign informants who had been killed, arrested or most likely compromised. Although brief, the cable laid out the specific number of agents executed by rival intelligence agencies — a closely held detail that counterintelligence officials typically do not share in such cables.” 

In the years since, Trump continues to maintain a close relationship with Putin; most recently he revealed that he’d asked “a favor” of the Russian dictator to “pause” his murderous, war-crime bombing of civilian infrastructure in Ukraine “for one week.” Putin, being in the power position, chose to laugh at Trump and continued his assault on the nation, although he did throw Trump a bone by pausing his hits on Kiev for a few days.

These aren’t just “a few bad judgment calls” or a president with “strange foreign policy instincts.” These stories (and literally hundreds of others) point to a man who’s behaved, consistently and predictably, like someone under leverage, someone whose personal fear of exposure of some sort of major crime — like the ones we know Epstein was holding over other billionaires — outweighs his loyalty to the nation he swore to serve. 

If Americans don’t demand real investigations, genuine accountability, and impeachment and jail time for what sure looks like the greatest counterintelligence failure in our history, we may lose what’s left of our democracy before the 2028 elections can fix things. If Democrats can take control of either branch of Congress and if Schumer and Jeffries get spine transplants and begin a serious investigation into Trump’s destruction of the United States and our historic role in the world, they’ll have enough to keep them busy for years. 

This is not about politics or personality. It’s about whether a country can survive being led by someone who looks captured and compromised by a foreign power. If even half of this is true, then staying quiet is the same as going along with it. We must demand real investigations and real consequences, or accept that the presidency can be bought, blackmailed, and used against the country itself. 

Let your elected officials know your thoughts on this, and don’t forget to demand your elected Republicans step up and defend America, too. You can reach your member of Congress and both your Senators via the congressional switchboard at: (202) 224-3121. 

See you in the streets on March 28th!


Tuesday, February 3, 2026

Jon Stewart Explains Why His Name Is in the Epstein Files: ‘This Is Actually True’

Trump’s name, of course, was also in the files with “thousands of mentions"
February 3, 2026 

Jon Stewart delved into the newly released batch of Jeffrey Epstein files on the latest episode of The Daily Show, noting that it feels like this has already happened.

“Yup, it’s Groundhog Day,” Stewart said. “We call it Groundhog Day because this is the day when Donald Trump sees Epstein’s shadow, and we get six more weeks of not knowing who any of the co-conspirators are in this multinational sex trafficking case. And, also, because Punxsutawney Phil is all over the files.”

He added, “The point I’m trying to make is the Epstein files thing? We’ve been through this before.” Stewart then playing several news clips that wondered whether the documents would “break MAGA.”

“The chances of this breaking MAGA are actually worse than Trump just lowering the age of consent to be done with the whole fucking thing,” Stewart added. “Which is not to say there isn’t awful shit in this new Epstein dump.”

The late-night host recounted some of the names in the new files, including Steve Bannon, Elon Musk, Bill Gates, Bill Clinton, Brett Ratner, Prince Andrew, and Richard Branson. Trump’s name, of course, was also in the files with “thousands of mentions.” Stewart admitted that he himself is in the files.

“This is actually true,” he said before explaining why. “I take you to the scene. It is midnight. Aug. 29, 2015. Jeffrey Epstein lies wide awake, his mind turning with ideas. He jots a quick note to a producer named Barry Josephson, saying, ‘I suggested to Woody [Allen]’ — y’all know which Woody, right? It’s the Epstein files, it ain’t Harrelson, or the cowboy from Toy Story. You know which one — quote: ‘I suggested to Woody that he do an exclusive new stand-up routine for either Apple TV or Amazon.’”

He continued, “Oh, Jeffrey Epstein always had his finger on the pulse of what America was clamoring for in 2015. But Barry Josephson, thinking like the out-of-the-box television professional that he was, pitched this idea. This is true, quote: ‘Make a true biographical experience with his stand-up being the capper. Somebody like Jon Stewart could host/narrate the biographical part.’”

Stewart added, “Excuse me? I am offended. Somebody like Jon Stewart, or Jon Stewart? My point is, do I have the offer, or is this an audition?”

Despite the breadth of new information, Stewart reminded there are still many more files yet to be released. “Look, man, we always knew that the people at DOJ releasing these documents weren’t on a fact-finding mission; they were running interference,” he noted. “And the guy they’re running interference for seems very satisfied with these results.”

Stewart concluded his monologue by comparing the lack of legal accountability for those named in the Epstein files and Trump’s current ICE takeover. Despite all of the information about notable public figures in the files, there is nothing that could lead to a prosecution.

“Nothing has happened to any of them,” Stewart said. “Oh, except Prince Andrew … I’m just not sure anybody is going to be held accountable for any of this.”

 He continued, “After watching the politically well-connected skirt any form of legal accountability for horrible fucking crimes, it seems pretty clear to me that there is a sanctuary city in this country,” Stewart said. “But guess what, this kid don’t live in it. 

The real sanctuary city is where money and power protect you from the consequences of sex trafficking, or influence peddling, or taking half a billion dollars and giving away America’s AI infrastructure. Not the small Midwestern city where trying to help a lady get up after she gets maced gets you shot in the back of the fucking head.”




Pam Bondi's Outrageous Tirade from Three Different Vantage Points

(GAZETTE BLOG EDITOR'S NOTE: In case you missed Attorney General Pam Bondi's beyond the pale performance before a House committee We...