Friday, October 21, 2022

ALDOUS J. PENNYFARTHING: Eric Trump claimed his dad charged Secret Service $50 for hotel rooms. The real figure was $1,185

In the wake of new reports that the Trump crime family (aka the Chicken All-Fredos) profited handsomely from the Secret Service’s visits to Trump-controlled properties during Donny’s “presidency,” MSNBC unearthed a telling clip of Eric Trump—who keeps showing up at Mar-a-Lago no matter how often his dad sends him to live with Chuck Grassley’s barn cats—brazenly lying about the fees Trump hotels charged the government.

While it’s an article of faith among MAGA types that Trump risked his imaginary billions in order to humbly serve as our president (Trump himself once risibly claimed that he’d lost between $2 billion and $5 billion while doing whatever that was in the White House), Trump appears to have been less than shy about using his position to reap unearned benefits.

For instance, there was that time he attempted to force G-7 leaders to gather at his national bedbug sanctuary in Miami. Or that bit about Air Force crews weirdly deciding to refuel mere miles outside of his Turnberry resort in Scotland. Or the fact that he didn’t actually put his assets in a blind trust like every other president since Watergate, leaving our nation vulnerable to countless potential (and no doubt actual) conflicts of interest.

But the Trumps don’t want to give away the game all at once, and so you get clips like this one, which MSNBC unearthed following the latest reports of Trump’s money-grubbing at taxpayer expense. Watch:

ERIC TRUMP: “If my father travels, they stay at our properties for free—meaning, like, cost for housekeeping, effectively. They do actually have to legally charge the government something. So everywhere that he goes, if he stays at one of his places, the government actually spends—meaning, it saves a fortune, because if they were to go to a hotel across the street, they’d be charging them 500 bucks a night, whereas, you know, we charge them, like, 50 bucks.”

Wait, is it possible Eric is even worse at basic arithmetic than these jabronis?

Okay, I know the Trumps aren’t terribly bright, but you have to try really, really hard to get an answer this wrong.

Here’s what Trump’s hotels were actually charging the government, according to NBC News:

During Donald Trump’s presidency, Trump hotels charged the Secret Service as much as $1,185 per night, more than five times the recommended government rate, and the high rates continued after he left office, according to an investigation released Monday by the House Committee on Oversight and Reform.

Beginning in January 2017 through Sept. 15, 2021, the Secret Service received at least 40 waivers to let it spend more than the recommended per diem rates to stay at Trump properties to protect Trump as a president and former president, and also to protect those around him, the investigation found.

Wait, maybe Eric was naively charging 50 bucks while the rest of his family was gouging the ever-living fuck out of us. Nah. Turns out he’s just a liar.

In one ledger obtained by the Oversight Committee and published in the report, the Secret Service was charged $1,160 for a room at the Trump International Hotel in Washington, D.C. for agents protecting Eric Trump on March 8, 2017. The government rate for D.C. on that night was $242. On Nov. 8, 2017, another ledger shows that the Secret Service was charged $1,185 to lodge agents protecting Donald Trump Jr. The government rate was $201.

The Trumps are shameless grifters. Full stop. If Trump ever makes his way back to Washington, D.C., expect Vladimir Putin’s next yacht to be full of ugly buff marks where he scraped the “USS Nimitz” off. Because Donald Trump simply can’t help himself. If there’s something worth stealing, you better believe he’ll steal it. Even—nay, especially—if it’s classified.

And yet, Republicans build monuments to this traitorous scoundrel.

Thursday, October 20, 2022

After Biden pledges to codify Roe, Pence reminds Americans how dangerous Republicans really are

WASHINGTON, DC - OCTOBER 18: U.S. President Joe Biden speaks at a Democratic National Committee event at the Howard Theatre on October 18, 2022 in Washington, DC. With three weeks until election day, in his remarks Biden highlighted issues pertaining to women̢۪s reproductive health and promised to codify access to abortion. (Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

President Joe Biden told attendees at a Democratic National Committee event Tuesday that he would fast-track passing a national abortion rights measure if Democrats strengthened their majorities in Congress this fall.

“If we do that, here’s the promise I make to you and the American people: The first bill I will send to the Congress will be to codify Roe v. Wade," Biden said to the crowd at the Howard Theatre in Washington, D.C. "And when Congress passes it, I’ll sign it in January, 50 years after Roe was first decided the law of the land,” Biden added.

Former Vice President Mike Pence took Biden’s pledge as his cue to remind voters that Republicans are unwaveringly committed to banning abortion nationwide.

"I’ve got news for President Biden," tweeted Pence. "Come January 22nd, we will have Pro-Life majorities in the House and Senate and we’ll be taking the cause of the right to Life to every state house in America!"

That's not just news for Biden, that's a warning to blue-state Democrats everywhere who perhaps feel deceptively insulated from the extremist bans red-state Republicans are unleashing on their constituents.

Republicans absolutely plan on banning abortion nationwide if they are given the keys to Congress and the White House. Pence views retaking the House and Senate this November as a first step in the Republican march toward inserting the government into every pregnancy-related decision people make in this country—from family planning to how and when they conceive to the reproductive health care decisions they make along the way.

Republicans aren't keeping this under wraps. Whether it's Sen. Lindsey Graham's 15-week national abortion ban or Pence's rallying cry, Republicans are making it plain. Biden reminded Americans of that during his DNC speech.  

"I want to repeat it again: The only sure way to stop these extremist laws that are—put in jeopardy women’s health and rights is for Congress to pass a law," Biden said.

"Right now, we’re short a handful of votes," Biden continued. "If you care about the right to choose, then you got to vote. That’s why, in these midterm elections, it’s so critical to elect more Democratic senators to the United States Senate and more Democrats to keep control of the House of Representatives."

Biden also reminded the audience that Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito dared women to vote if they didn't like the Supreme Court decision he penned, writing, "Women are not without electoral or political power.”

Biden called the statement "extraordinary," adding with a chuckle, "Let me tell you something—the Court and the extreme Republicans who have spent decades trying to overturn Roe are about to find out. Just take a look at what happened in Kansas. And come this November, we’re going to see what happens all over America, God willing."

The contrasting visions for America being laid out by Democrats and Republicans couldn't be more stark. Republicans, wielding the structural advantages of a flawed electoral system, plan to end Americans' privacy rights and broadly insert government into people's most closely guarded personal decisions.

Democrats seek to safeguard those very same personal decisions in every way possible by codifying Americans' privacy rights into federal law.

You can help make this a reality by simply voting and voting early. Get friends and elders to the polls. If you're older, call your kids and grandkids to make sure they vote. If you're younger, host a voting party where you and your friends fill out your ballots together. Let’s do this!

And these protesters were so right about the "I like beer" justice.  How low can you go?

Wednesday, October 19, 2022

McCarthy confirms: GOP will crash the economy unless Democrats agree to destroy Social Security

WASHINGTON, DC - MARCH 09: House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) holds his weekly news conference at the U.S. Capitol on March 09, 2022 in Washington, DC. McCarthy answered a range of questions related primarily to rising gas prices and the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. (Photo by Tasos Katopodis/Getty Images)

If the GOP regains the House, four of the leading Republicans contenders for the House Budget Committee chair have all vowed to demand cuts to Social Security and Medicare in return for their cooperation in raising the debt ceiling next year. To be clear, that’s Republicans saying they will crash the U.S. economy to force President Joe Biden to give into their demands.

Now would-be House Speaker Kevin McCarthy has confirmed that yes, that’s exactly what Republicans intend to do. That continues to generate yawns from the super savvy reporters in D.C. and New York, who largely ignored the first reports of this threat. Now they’re continuing to try to downplay it. But it’s as real and as dangerous as can be.

“You can’t just continue down the path to keep spending and adding to the debt,” McCarthy said in an interview with Punchbowl News, reported in The Washington Post. “And if people want to make a debt ceiling [for a longer period of time], just like anything else, there comes a point in time where, okay, we’ll provide you more money, but you got to change your current behavior.”

As if Republicans had no agency in federal spending, as if they had no part in, for example, the ballooning defense budgets year after year. “We’re not just going to keep lifting your credit card limit, right,” he added. “And we should seriously sit together and [figure out] where can we eliminate some waste? Where can we make the economy grow stronger?” Again, as if the budget of the United States of America was like a household budget and Democrats were profligate teenagers with credit cards.

“Waste,” in Republican terms, is people getting the Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid they pay for with their taxes. McCarthy tried to play coy in the interview, saying he wouldn’t “predetermine” that they’re talking about Social Security and Medicare because, while he’s not the sharpest knife in the drawer he’s not as dull as, say, Ron Johnson.

The cat’s already out of the bag on that, however. Any of the four people McCarthy will put in charge of the Budget Committee will threaten those programs, giving Biden a choice: Cave to their demands to destroy the U.S. economy, or they’ll destroy the global economy. Those are the choices, particularly since Republicans would also extend the Trump tax cuts. They’d enforce recession-inducing austerity on everyone but the super-rich.

Beyond the fact that they’ve already committed to the idea that they’ll threaten to blow up the global economy over these critical social insurance programs, of course they will! Social Security and Medicare have been on the Republicans chopping block since the programs were passed. Republicans hate them. Republicans hate that people love them so much they put Democrats in power for decades. They didn’t break through until they figured out how to get billions of dark money dollars into our political system to give them wins, and now they’re going to pay those big funders back by stealing the money in those programs.

All of the very serious people in D.C. and New York don’t think there’s any way the Republicans would actually force the U.S. into default. Just like they assured us all the people saying abortion rights were in jeopardy were crying wolf, because no way would the Supreme Court do that after decades of precedent. Just like they said warning Donald Trump wasn’t going to accept the results of the election and would do anything to stay in office was being alarmist.

Way back when, before the pre-MAGA nihilists of the Tea Party took over the Republican Party, government shutdowns were nearly unthinkable. The debt ceiling was sacrosanct and no one would actually consider breaching it. Sure, they’d use the regular vote to suspend or lift it as an opportunity to raise hell about the debt and deficits, but no elected official would have used it as a bargaining chip. Any lawmaker who did would have been called out in the media as a total crank and would have been isolated by their leadership and colleagues.  

All of which is to say normal business as usual is barely a speck in the review mirror, and as usual the very serious people in D.C. and New York refuse to acknowledge that. We—the people who aren’t shielding vital information from the public because that has to go in the books we’re negotiating six-plus deals on—don’t have the luxury of ignoring Republicans when they tell us what they’re going to do.

So we have to be the ones to make sure that McCarthy and his MAGA crew don’t get their dirty claws on Social Security, Medicare, and all the vital programs that are keeping Americans hanging on.

Monday, October 17, 2022

Trump 'wanted people to die' so he could invoke the Insurrection Act and stay in power

TOPSHOT - US President Donald Trump listens during a discussion with state attorneys general on protection from social media abuses in the Cabinet Room of the White House in Washington, DC, on September 23, 2020. (Photo by MANDEL NGAN / AFP) (Photo by MANDEL NGAN/AFP via Getty Images) 
Here is an aerial of Trump's famous comb-over hairdo.  The charlatan is bald as a grapefruit.

There is a reason, former Department of Homeland Security chief of staff Miles Taylor explains, why Trump did nothing on Jan. 6 to stop the insurrection at the U.S. Capitol. The reason is simple: Trump gleefully watched the sordid events unfold on television while his aides panicked and pleaded with him fruitlessly to do something because he wanted people to die.

As Taylor points out, the more deaths that occurred (especially deaths to members of Congress) the better justification Trump would have for invoking the Insurrection Act, declaring martial law, and ultimately preventing the peaceful transfer of power.

In this clip, which aired Thursday evening on MSNBC, Taylor speaks as someone who knows Trump and has spent a significant amount of time with him. He understands Trump’s depraved mindset as well as anyone.

From Matthew Chapman, reporting for Raw Story:

"It made my heart race to watch today's hearing, really, because they brought up Trump's mindset, and the question was, what was his mindset?" Taylor told anchor Nicolle Wallace. "I'm going to demystify that for America right now. I've spent time with the guy in the Oval Office, the White House situation room, and Air Force One. I'll tell you what his mindset was on January 6th."

"I believe Donald Trump wanted people to die," said Taylor. "He wanted people to die … who were elected officials, en masse, so he could call out the military, so he could invoke the Insurrection Act, so he could prevent the peaceful transfer of power. That's not a conspiracy theory. In fact, in hindsight, it's pretty damn clear to me this is what he had in mind from day one in office."

The news media long ago fell into the trap of portraying Donald Trump as some sort of gruff but still amusing blowhard, boorish but mesmerizingly larger than life, essentially an entertainer spewing riveting (if raw) verbiage tailor-made for media consumption. This was the image he cultivated on The Apprentice, and it’s the same image that got him elected. To this day, the media regard Trump more with fascination than the horrified repugnance he actually warrants.

It’s almost as if the idea that someone in such a position of power could be so utterly bereft of human decency is just too much for our media to process. Thanks in large part to this treatment he received prior to the 2016 election, nearly half the electorate—and perhaps more—continue to regard him as a type of media-savvy clown, playing to his adoring fans by saying “just what he thinks,” without ever questioning why what he “thinks” strangely aligns with their own prejudices and predispositions.

Many in this country began to realize exactly what Trump was when they took note of the things he said during his rallies, by his weird embrace of murderous dictators, and by his solicitude toward virulent racists. But what really should have been a colossal, waving red flag to the vast majority of Americans was the complete disregard of human life he exhibited during the COVID-19 pandemic. As things turned out, enough people got the message about the kind of evil we were really saddled with in Donald Trump. Hundreds of thousands of people died miserably and unnecessarily for the sole reason that they’d placed their faith in Trump’s words, and the words of those whose political careers stood to profit from their allegiance to him. Even then, at no time did Trump exhibit the slightest degree of empathy or compassion for those deaths, nor has he expressed or intimated such sentiments since.

What we have with Trump is not a clown, not a boor, not a “populist,” but someone with the mindset of a cold-blooded murderer. The incongruity of witnessing someone with such a mindset placed at the pinnacle of American power, someone fawned upon by the media and who (for many) gave voice to their own inner resentments, operated to obscure that basic fact, even from those who truly should have known better.

The Jan. 6 Select Committee has done yeoman’s work in unmasking the fact that Trump was intent on maintaining power and instigated a deadly insurrection among his most virulent followers to achieve that end. But it still hasn’t managed to convey in the clearest possible terms what is blatantly obvious: that this man fully intended as many Americans as necessary to die for him to preserve his own position and status. And worse, that he would not have lost a second’s worth of sleep over it.

That is the very definition of “evil.”

Shifty-eyed Trump: "the very definition of evil."

Sunday, October 16, 2022

Steve Bannon gives ‘America’s mayor’ microphone. He uses it to endorse genocide of Indigenous people

LANSING, MI - DECEMBER 02:  U.S. President Donald Trump's personal attorney Rudy Giuliani listens to Detroit poll worker Jessi Jacobs during an appearance before the Michigan House Oversight Committee on December 2, 2020 in Lansing, Michigan. Guiliani and the president's legal team are claiming widespread voter fraud in Michigan and other closely contested states in the November 3 presidential election. The hearing will not change results of the vote in Michigan, which has already been certified.  (Photo by Rey Del Rio/Getty Images)
President Donald Trump's personal attorney, Rudy Giuliani, listens to Detroit poll worker Jessi Jacobs during an appearance before the Michigan House Oversight Committee.

On Monday, Rudy Giuliani, former President Donald Trump’s ex-personal attorney who is now embroiled in a criminal investigation for election interference in Georgia, took to the air on the Real America’s Voice network show War Room With Steve Bannon to display all his colonizer ignorance and racism.

Giuliani made the unfortunate decision to step out of his lane and into one he clearly knew nothing about: the history of Christopher Columbus and his attempt to completely annihilate most of the Native people he encountered in his travels.

When asked about the 15th century explorer, Raw Story reports that Giuliani made an effort to defend the actions of Columbus, dismissing the violence and enslavement committed at his hands and that of his crew by saying, “Columbus is probably the first hero, and there's no evidence that he did any of these things. In fact, most of the atrocities they're talking about occurred thirty years after he left.”

Giuliani added:

If anything, he was a, he was, he was benevolent. He tried very, very hard to avoid the wars that went on. But let, let, I mean, look. The people he brought over with him, they weren't saints. They were soldiers. But the people there were living in the third world, including a third world of violence where, where they scalped each other and killed each other and raped each other. This wasn't a civilization he came to. This was a third, fourth-world country. They had no idea of what they were facing. Columbus did everything he could to control it. It got out of control forty years later and he's being blamed for it. And this history is only like ten years old.

When he was finished gaslighting Native Americans, Giuliani went on to add John F. Kennedy to his list of heroes who’ve faltered, Business Insider reports.

"And have all of our other heroes done that? I mean, John F. Kennedy — now it's a different age, but now we know things about John F. Kennedy that make him considerably less than perfect."

He then pivoted to President Franklin Roosevelt’s administration during World War II, when they made the infamous choice to turn away Jewish refugees who came to the U.S. to flee the Nazis.

Here’s the truth, in case Giuliani is listening: According to History.com, Columbus and his men “enslaved many native inhabitants of the West Indies and subjected them to extreme violence and brutality.”

History.com writes:

On his first day in the New World, he ordered six of the natives to be seized, writing in his journal that he believed they would be good servants. Throughout his years in the New World, Columbus enacted policies of forced labor in which natives were put to work for the sake of profits. Later, Columbus sent thousands of peaceful Taino “Indians” from the island of Hispaniola to Spain to be sold. Many died en route.

Those left behind were forced to search for gold in mines and work on plantations. Within 60 years after Columbus landed, only a few hundred of what may have been 250,000 Taino were left on their island.

As usual, Giuliani and the party he stands with are simply out of touch.

According to The Washington Post and MIT, since 2018, at least 40 monuments to Columbus have been removed—most in 2020 and 2021—with over 130 that remain standing.

In 2021, President Joe Biden declared Columbus Day to be observed as Indigenous Peoples’ Day.

Hillary Kempenich, an artist and member of the Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa, told the Associated Press at the time, “This was completely unexpected. Even though we’ve been talking about it and wanting it for so long,” adding that she was “overwhelmed with joy.”

Best way to shut Rudy up is to just cut off his mouth.  There!

Saturday, October 15, 2022

Right-wing media is reaching in ever more bizarre ways to stoke fear and disgust in its viewers

 WASHINGTON, DC - JANUARY 20: Youth Poet Laureate Amanda Gorman speaks at the inauguration of U.S. President Joe Biden on the West Front of the U.S. Capitol on January 20, 2021 in Washington, DC.  During today's inauguration ceremony Joe Biden becomes the 46th president of the United States. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)

Amanda Gorman.

Republicans and the right-wing media are in full swing with a tactic to powerfully bind their followers to them and to each other through a sense that only they are reasonable and the rest of the world is spinning out of control. Painting your political opponents as other is a time-tested technique and one that’s extremely flexible—often, all they really have to do is point to the existence of Black people or LGBTQ people—but right now it’s getting a little ridiculous, and a lot dangerous, as they reach further and further for material.

Take the whole litter boxes in schools thing, for instance. If you’re asking “What litter boxes in schools,” congratulations, you are blessedly removed from the right-wing media ecosystem. But since it’s been repeated again and again by some prominent Republicans, as well as by lesser-known ones as it percolates through their bubble, there’s a decent chance you know what this lie is about.

The litter boxes in schools claim has been circulating since at least January, and if you don’t know what it’s about, here you go: The claim is that students who identify as furries demand to use litter boxes, and schools are obliging them. It is unequivocally false, but it has been repeated by Rep. Lauren Boebert, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, the chair of the Michigan Republican Party, a Republican congressional candidate in Illinois, a Nebraska Republican state senator, the Republican gubernatorial nominee in Colorado, the Republican gubernatorial nominee in Minnesota, and more.

“They meow and they bark and they interact with their teachers in this fashion,” one said. “And now schools are wanting to put litter boxes in the schools for these children to use. How is this sanitary?” He later apologized—but that didn’t stop the lie from spreading.

“I hear story after story from teachers and school administrators detailing meetings about this 'furry' trend in (Illinois) public schools,” Illinois congressional candidate Catrina Lauf emailed the Daily Herald, refusing to provide examples but railing against a Democratic law to provide free menstrual hygiene products in schools, as well as teachers being forced to refer to children “by whatever pronouns they decide to go by that week.”

”What are we doing to our kids? Why are we telling elementary kids that they get to choose their gender this week? Why do we have litter boxes in some of the school districts so kids can pee in them, because they identify as a furry? We’ve lost our minds. We’ve lost our minds,” Minnesota gubernatorial candidate Scott Jensen recently said.

School systems are constantly having to come out and rebut this claim: Danville, New York. Greenville, South Carolina. Monroe County, Illinois. Des Moines, Iowa. Salem-Keizer, Oregon.

“It is unconscionable that this afternoon I am sending this communication,” the superintendent of one Michigan school system wrote early in the year. “However, our Midland PS stakeholders may be confused about a false message/accusation that has resurfaced this week and is gaining traction in the social media realm.”

”Perhaps someone on social media connected the puddle in a bathroom to this social media trend and took it to another level,” the superintendent in Danville, New York, told the Associated Press. “There are so many important issues in the world right now. I just am baffled by anyone’s reactivation with this kind of nonsense.”

On one level, this is an attack on trans students and schools with affirming policies, saying that supporting trans kids is the same as providing litter boxes for kids who “identify as cats.” On another level, it’s an attack on public schools for allegedly catering to the whims of children rather than leading them, and exposing fragile innocents to the deviance of their peers. This obsessive Republican attack is absolutely those things. But it is also a message to conservatives fearful of a changing world in which people who aren’t just like them are nonetheless seen as fully human. The message? You should be afraid. You should feel disgust. You should layer over your fear and disgust with ostentatious contempt and ridicule to make sure the world gets the message that people who are different from you are abominations. You should feel that the world is spinning out of control and your place in it is under assault from all sides—all sides except the Republican Party and its media outlets and your fellow fearful white conservatives.

The litter boxes in schools lie is among the most persistent and damaging versions of this message in recent months. But it’s one in a long string of them, and they come in versions large and small. Before litter boxes in schools there was “critical race theory,” also something that did not exist in public K-12 schools but became a right-wing fixation. There’s Tucker Carlson on Fox News every night spewing great replacement theory and delivering warnings like, “The point of the exercise is to humiliate the rest of us by forcing us to obey transparently absurd orders.”

“I don’t want to live in a country that looks nothing the country I grew up in,” Carlson has said, getting to the heart of the fear he is urging his viewers to be consumed by. And on Wednesday night, he delivered a rant against two young women who have tried, in their different ways, to change the world: Greta Thunberg and Amanda Gorman.

Carlson’s attack on Thunberg was to two ends at once: railing against efforts to combat climate change and arguing falsely that she, like John Fetterman, is a disabled person being used and exploited by Democrats to gain political advantage. But it was also, very importantly, just an attack on a young woman, still a teenager, for being different from him and for working to bring change. Carlson’s attack on Amanda Gorman, by contrast, was a straight-up ridicule, a gratuitous line tossed in to denigrate a successful young Black woman.

“We’re supposed to accommodate Greta Thunberg’s disability, pretend her words are profound. Just like the fake poet at Biden's administration,” Carlson said. He broke into a mocking tone, saying, as if quoting someone, “’Oh, she was so great. We dare you to say she wasn't,’” then breaking into a high-pitched cackle and adding, “She was ridiculous.”

Gorman is a Phi Beta Kappa graduate of Harvard, the first National Youth Poet Laureate, and someone who has an auditory processing disorder and a speech impediment but read her own work on one of the biggest possible stages. Her poetry books have made bestseller lists, a rather rare achievement for poetry. To Carlson, she is ridiculous—or so he would have his audience believe. But he’s pairing that insistence that this remarkable person is ridiculous with the implied threat (“We dare you”) that speaking this truth will draw condemnation. The prospect of young women gaining fame for trying to move us past a world dominated by the likes of Tucker Carlson is terrifying to him, and so he tells his audience to greet it with rage and fear and mockery all at once.

The idea that the kids these days are going to ruin everything is a longstanding one, of course, and it’s fodder for a lot of right-wing fretting on things from the enormous to the trivial. Take this:

 An entire right-wing news cycle driven by a single Reddit comment, incredible.

Replying to @RottenInDenmark
They're not even linking to original Reddit post, probably so they can hide the fact that it's nearly a year old and doesn't include any of the claims they're making about it.

The youths are mocking you … and also, they’re incredibly oversensitive and speak in their own language and who can understand these weirdos. So remember, everyone, if a young person suggests that something you said was sexist or racist or transphobic or ableist, these are the people who also think a thumbs up emoji is “hostile” and “inappropriate.” That means that your sexism or racism is only on par with the use of an innocent, friendly emoji.

Again and again and again, Republicans use lies to advance the idea that their supporters are the only sane, reasonable people out there, but that they are embattled and endangered by a series of threats coming from everyone else, all those other people who think trans kids should be supported or want to fight climate change or use emojis a little differently or are simply young and Black and exemplary. From the outside, it’s often bizarre and more than a little silly, but the effect is to create solidarity among Republicans, to tell them that only people who are like them in every particular way—down to the finest little difference—can be trusted or respected. That the correct posture to take toward everyone else is fear and contempt and aggression. And as we see again and again, the message is received.

                           Greta Thunberg.

"WE THE PEOPLE": AMERICA IS BACK!

A Blue Wave Just Crashed on Trump   Senator-elect James Talarico at an Election Night event in Au...