Friday, May 30, 2025

Army paratroopers will make big boy Trump feel special on his birthday

no image description available
President Donald Trump poses for a photo with participants of an air assault exercise at Fort Drum, New York, on Aug. 13, 2018.

A flashy parade wasn’t enough adoration for Trump, even though it’s so massive that it will wreck the streets of our nation’s capital. He needs it to be a personal and obvious celebration of him and Army leaders are well aware of this, which is why paratroopers from the elite U.S. Army Parachute Team known as the Golden Knights will be parachuting in during the parade and, upon landing, hand the birthday boy a flag. 

However, the Army would like you to know that there are currently no plans to sing “Happy Birthday” to Trump. But earlier reports had the Golden Knights parachuting down to the review stand at the Ellipse, so why not throw in a nice authoritarian gesture by adding the flag handoff?


Related | What recession? Trump’s got big plans to use your money for his birthday


This latest attempt to turn the Army’s birthday into a Trump jubilee will no doubt add to the already staggering costs of this production. When Trump tried to mount a military parade during his first term, the cost was estimated at $92 million. 

The Department of Homeland Security hasn’t provided a cost estimate this time around, despite the event already being designated a “national security special event” by the Secret Service, requiring extra safety measures. 

Estimates of the Army’s cost alone range from $25 million to $45 million. But don’t worry! The Army says it will pay for the massive damage this parade could do to Washington, D.C.’s roads. That sounds nice—until you remember that the Army pays for things with our tax dollars. But since Trump was already proposing a trillion-dollar military budget, this is pocket change for the Army.

The possible damage to the roads is hardly minor, however. The military tanks that are going to rumble down Constitution Avenue weigh roughly 25 times as much as a car. Holding the parade in the summer also raises the possibility of the sun-baked asphalt roads buckling or collapsing entirely. Oh, and on narrower streets, the tanks could crush the curbs and take out lampposts. And although the Army is being all breezy about paying for any destruction, that ignores the fact that roads take a long time to properly repair

Cartoon by Jack Ohman

Nobody is clamoring for these overwrought festivities except Trump and his sycophants, but one thing the aspiring autocrat refuses to grasp is that normal people will not turn out in droves to see him. His cult of true believers salivates for his rallies, but the dismal turnout at both of his presidential inaugurations shows that doesn’t translate to big celebrations in our nation’s capital. 

He outright lied about attendance at his first inauguration, claiming it was the largest in history despite the obvious evidence disproving that. He moved his second inauguration ceremony indoors due to cold weather and made up some nonsense about streaming numbers instead, trying to say he smashed Ronald Reagan’s 1981 viewing record. 

Yes, the true believers will be there. The pardoned Jan. 6 insurrectionists will probably show up. Maybe all the billionaire tech bros who lavished millions on Trump for his inauguration will attend so they can sit next to the big important man again. The president is already selling access to the highest bidders, with a “dedicated VIP experience” available for big donors to America250, the nonprofit set up to organize sesquicentennial celebrations next year—and conveniently staffed by Trump loyalists. All that money, though, can’t guarantee high turnout for this parade of flattery. 

As much as the Army keeps taking pains to say that the parade is no big deal and just part of a larger observance of its existence, everyone knows that’s not true. The parade is a celebration of a strongman president and an authoritarian display of power. It’s a profoundly anti-American event disguised as a patriotic procession, and no one should pretend otherwise.

Wouldn't it be a shame if it rained on Donnie's parade.  Maybe some tennis ball-sized "hail" to the chief.  Calling all cloud seeders.

Wednesday, May 28, 2025

A Hidden Measure in the Republican Budget Bill Would Crown Trump King

 A Hidden Measure in the Republican Budget Bill Would Crown Trump King  

Donald Trump speaks at the infamous campaign rally at Madison Square Garden. (photo: Alex Brandon/AP)

The bill could stop federal courts from enforcing their rulings, eliminating any restraint on Trump
Robert Reich / Guardian UK
 

If enacted, Donald Trump’s Big Ugly Bill as it emerged on Thursday from the House of Representatives would result in the largest redistribution of income and wealth in American history – from the poor and working class to the rich.

Hidden within the bill is also a provision that would allow Trump to crown himself king.

For months now, Trump has been trying to act like a king by ignoring court rulings against him.

The supreme court has told Trump to “facilitate” the return of Kilmar Ábrego García, a legal resident of the United States who even the Trump regime admits was erroneously sent to a brutal prison in El Salvador.

Trump has done nothing.

Lower federal courts have ordered him to stop deporting migrants without giving them a chance to know the charges against them and have the charges and evidence reviewed by a neutral judge or magistrate – the minimum of due process.

Again, nothing.

Judge James Boasberg, chief judge of the federal district court for the District of Columbia, issued a temporary restraining order preventing the Trump regime from flying individuals to the prison in El Salvador without due process.

Judge Boasberg has found that the Trump regime has willfully disregarded his order.

Is there anything that the courts can do in response to Trump’s open defiance of judges and justices?

They have only one power to make their orders stick. They can hold federal officials in contempt, and enforce such contempt citations by fining or jailing them.

It’s a radical remedy, rarely used. But several federal judges are at their wits’ end.

Boasberg said that if Trump’s legal team does not give the dozens of Venezuelan men sent to the Sallvadorian prison a chance to legally challenge their removal, he’ll begin contempt proceedings against the administration.

In a separate case, the US district court judge Paula Xinis has demanded that the Trump administration explain why it is not complying with the supreme court order to “facilitate” the release of Ábrego García.

Xinis has even questioned whether the administration intends to comply with the order at all, citing a statement from the. homeland security chief, Kristi Noem, that Ábrego García “will never be allowed to return to the United States”.

According to Xinis, “That sounds to me like an admission. That’s about as clear as it can get.”

So what’s the next step? Will the supreme court and lower courts hold the administration in contempt and enforce the contempt citations?

Trump and his Republican stooges in Congress apparently anticipated this. Hidden inside their Big Ugly Bill is a provision intended to block the courts from using contempt to enforce its orders. It reads:

“No court of the United States may use appropriated funds to enforce a contempt citation for failure to comply with an injunction or temporary restraining order if no security was given when the injunction or order was issued …”

Translated: no federal court may enforce a contempt citation.

The measure would make most existing injunctions – in antitrust cases, police reform cases, school desegregation cases and others – unenforceable.

Its only purpose is to weaken the power of the federal courts.

As Erwin Chemerinsky, UC Berkeley School of Law dean and distinguished professor of law, notes, this provision would eliminate any restraint on Trump.

“Without the contempt power, judicial orders are meaningless and can be ignored. There is no way to understand this except as a way to keep the Trump administration from being restrained when it violates the Constitution or otherwise breaks the law …

“This would be a stunning restriction on the power of the federal courts. The Supreme Court has long recognized that the contempt power is integral to the authority of the federal courts. Without the ability to enforce judicial orders, they are rendered mere advisory opinions which parties are free to disregard.”

In other words, with this single measure, Trump will have crowned himself king.

If it is enacted, no Congress and no court could stop him. Even if a future Congress were to try, it could not do so without the power of the courts to enforce their hearings, investigations, subpoenas and laws.

The gross unfairness of Trump’s Big Ugly Bill is bad enough. It would worsen the nation’s already near-record inequalities of income and wealth.

But the provision inside the bill that neuters the federal courts is even worse. It would remove the last remaining constraint on Trump, and thereby effectively end American democracy.

Is this the future Trump envisions for us?


Monday, May 26, 2025

'This is a disgrace': Trump ripped for 'outrageous' and 'divisive' Memorial Day diatribe


Early Memorial Day 2025, President Donald Trump used his Truth Social platform to post a rambling diatribe.

King Donnie launches vile tantrum on solemn day of remembrance 

Story by Alex Henderson
Memorial Day
May26, 2025

Trump, writing in all caps (and complete with bad grammar and spelling), posted: "HAPPY MEMORIAL DAY TO ALL, INCLUDING THE SCUM THAT SPENT THE LAST FOUR YEARS TRYING TO DESTROY OUR COUNTRY THROUGH WARPED RADICAL LEFT MINDS, WHO ALLOWED 21,000,000 MILLION PEOPLE TO ILLEGALLY ENTER OUR COUNTRY, MANY OF THE BEING CRIMINALS AND THE MENTAO INSANE,THROUGH AN OPEN BORDER THAT ONLY AN INCOMPETENT PRESIDENT WOULD APPROVE, AND THROUGH JUDGES WHO ARE ON A MISSION TO KEEP MURDERERS, DRUG DEALERS, RAPISTS, GANG MEMBERS, AND RELEASED PRISONERS FROM ALL OVER THE WORLD, IN OUR COUNTRY SO THEY CAN ROB, MURDERERS, AND RAPE AGAIN, PROTECTED BY THESE USA HATING JUDGES WHO SUFFER FROM AN IDEOLOGY THAT IS SICK, AND VERY DANGEROUS FOR OUR COUNTRY. HOPEFULLY THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, AND OTHER GOOD AND COMPASSIONATE JUDGES THROUGHOUT THE LAND, WILL SAVE US FROM THE DECISIONS OF THE MONSTERS WHO WANT OUR COUNTRY TO GO TO HELL."

But Trump, according to Mediaite, later deleted that post and replaced it with a much shorter post that read simply, "HAPPY MEMORIAL DAY!

The original post is receiving a lot of reactions on X, formerly Twitter.

READ MORE: Trump wants us explode in violent outrage — here's why

Eric Daughterty of the right-wing Florida's Voice News tweeted, "JUST IN: Trump issues glorious, classic Memorial Day message."

The far-right Catturd, who has 3.7 million followers on X, wrote, "Trump's Happy Memorial Day post - lol - love it."

But other X users weren't so favorable.

North Carolina resident Matthew Cornell posted, "This is a ridiculous statement by Trump. Totally and utterly ridiculous."

READ MORE: Struggles to 'even finish a sentence': Behind the obvious signs of Trump's growing dementia

X user Stella Kelly commented, "Why not just honor the fallen. Not really a day for divisive comments."

Another X userm, JerseyBoy, @BetsJersey, wrote, "Trump is the most anti American person. Imagine being so insecure and angry that you use Memorial Day, a day of remembrance, to launch a tantrum full of lies and hate. Pathetic doesn't even cover it."

Wall Street investment banker Evaristus Odinikaeze tweeted, "This is Outrageous. On a day meant to honor the fallen, Trump spews hate, conspiracies, and xenophobia. This is a disgrace to the memory of those who gave everything for this country. It’s a #MemorialDay and another reminder that he’s unfit to lead."

NOW READ: A veteran tells Trump 'to go straight to hell'

Trump tells us all where to go in a very special Memorial Day tirade.
 

Sunday, May 25, 2025

Sources: Trump Administration Lied That New Luxury 747-8 Was A Gift

 

A plane fit for a Muslim King.

Story by Channing Reid

Refurbishing the "gift" ego plane will cost taxpayers millions upon millions

President Trump's administration is believed to have initiated talks regarding the recent transfer of a Qatar-owned luxury Boeing 747-8 to the US, according to multiple sources familiar with the matter. 

The development opposes the widely reported notion that the Qatari government first reached out to the President to offer the aircraft as a gift to be used as the new interim Air Force One.

The arrival of the jumbo aircraft, commonly referred to as “a flying palace,” stems from Boeing’s significant delays in developing the official replacements for the aged 747-200 jets (VC-25As) that currently serve as Air Force One. Mr. Trump has unquestionably been angered by the continued postponement of the highly modified pair of 747-8s (VC-25Bs), which will not be delivered for at least another two years .

No Longer Wanting To Wait

Four sources familiar with the negotiations regarding the Qatari jumbo jet suggested the Trump administration inquired about acquiring the aircraft first, rather than Qatar deciding to gift the plane, according to a bombshell report by CNN earlier this week. Following the President beginning his second term in January, Boeing reportedly informed the Pentagon of its VC-25B delivery delays.

Nonetheless, the administration did not want to wait any longer and began to explore other options for a replacement. The President asked Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff to compile a list of feasible aircraft, according to a senior White House official who spoke to CNN. Boeing also reportedly provided information on other worldwide clients that had planes that could work well as a temporary new Air Force One, and Qatar was one of them.

One of the sources with knowledge on the discussions recalled that the Pentagon “offered to buy” an aircraft, followed by Qatar indicating it was willing to sell, according to CNN. Another source reportedly mentioned that initial discussions were centered around leasing the 747-8 rather than an outright purchase.

The negotiations did not begin until after the Pentagon learned that the White House supported acquiring the aircraft. Witkoff reportedly helped initiate the discussions.

The President Has Had An Eye On The Aircraft For A While

Simple Flying previously reported that the President toured the aircraft earlier this year in West Palm Beach. White House Communications Director Steven Cheung blamed Boeing for failing “to deliver a new Air Force One on time as promised.”

In February, Mr. Trump touted that he “could buy” a replacement “from another country, perhaps.” In an interview with FOX News, he also admitted that Boeing was “very late” with the VC-25Bs. However, he has more recently refrained from indicating any idea that his administration approached Qatar in hopes of finding a replacement. Instead, he described the Qatari 747-8 as a “GIFT, FREE OF CHARGE,” on social media.

The Defense Department officially accepted the 747-8 from Qatar on Wednesday. Now, the US Air Force is working to rapidly upgrade the aircraft with modifications to meet the requirements of a presidential plane. 

It is unclear how long the upgrades will take, but the President wants the aircraft sooner rather than later, according to the White House. Some experts believe the jet’s transformation will be expensive and require a lot of time.

$62 Million: L3Harris Settlement Agreement

Prior to receiving the aircraft, Simple Flying learned that the Trump administration had tapped defense contractor L3Harris Technologies to overhaul and refurbish the jet. The firm made headlines on Thursday after agreeing to settle allegations that it fabricated the prices of equipment purchased by the US military, according to CNBC.

“L3 failed to disclose accurate, complete, and current cost or pricing data relating to the labor, material, and other costs,” the Department of Justice argued.

It has also been alleged that the company “falsely certified that it had done so in dozens of government contract proposals.”

The alleged deception reportedly occurred between 2006 and 2014. L3Harris will pay $62 million in settlement and is reportedly “pleased to have been able to amicably resolve” the conflict. However, the company has not admitted to any fault or liability regarding the matter, CNBC reported.

Simple Flying contacted L3Harris for comment on the settlement agreement and its plans to transform the 747-8. A representative could not be immediately reached.

Following the President’s second and final term, the aircraft will be donated to the Trump presidential library – allowing him to use it as a private citizen. However, he has reportedly denied that he will fly it then.

Yet another lie?

What if every time he tells a lie he gains a pound?

 

Friday, May 23, 2025

No Surrender: The Boss Is Showing How to Stand Up to Trump

No Surrender: The Boss Is Showing How to Stand Up to Trump  

Bruce Springsteen performs during 'The Night Before' rally at Independence Hall on Nov. 7, 2016. (photo: WireImage)

SPRINGSTEEN: "America...is currently in the hands of a corrupt, incompetent and treasonous administration."
 
Tom Watson / Democracy Docket
rsn.org reader supported news

ALSO SEE: Why Trump Is Threatening to Investigate Bruce Springsteen

President Donald Trump began the week by threatening a quartet of accomplished musical artists who have dared to challenge his radical MAGA hegemony with federal prosecution. In typical unhinged fashion, Trump lashed out at superstars Beyoncé, Taylor Swift, Bruce Springsteen and Bono (an Irish citizen legally beyond his reptilian reach) — demanding a major investigation into these “unpatriotic entertainers” who campaigned for Kamala Harris last year, musicians he accused of being “corrupt and unlawful.”

In reality, Trump’s rant was ignited by Springsteen’s acerbic comments on stage at two concerts in Manchester, England last week. Springsteen, who is 75 and has taken part in American political and social protests since he played the No Nukes festival at Madison Square Garden in 1979, spoke more directly than any major entertainment figure has since Trump’s inauguration. 

Before those words sink into the oozing quicksand of daily outrage and click-chasing Trump media coverage, it’s worth a closer look at the message — because I think it’s an important moment in the evolution of the growing opposition to this authoritarian gang.

First, it’s important to note that Springsteen’s words were scripted. I watched the videos from both nights, and the words were clearly on the lyrics prompter that major artists use on stage. This was no rant of the moment — it was intentional, targeted and as carefully crafted as any song off Darkness on the Edge of Town. Springsteen posted a video and a full transcript to his website. This was a plan.

Secondly, Springsteen didn’t pull any punches — no references to “our national divide” or “both sides” or “polarization.” He was direct, angry and precise in his language. This was pure lights out tonight, trouble in the heartland:

In my home, the America I love, the America I’ve written about, that has been a beacon of hope and liberty for 250 years, is currently in the hands of a corrupt, incompetent and treasonous administration.

Thirdly, Springsteen was clearly paying attention — both to the most egregious outrages of the Trump administration, and to the nature of the American opposition to its extremism. 

He made a seven-point list that directly relates to what he believes are the worst abuses of these long four months. It’s worthwhile to review these, because they align closely not only with the myriad court cases and lawsuits challenging Trump’s henchmen, but also with what protestors and activists are saying in thousands of rallies around the country. 

In Springsteen’s words, “There’s some very weird, strange and dangerous shit going on out there right now.”

These are Springsteen’s seven key talking points (annotated with links):

  1. In America, they are persecuting people for using their right to free speech and voicing their dissent. This is happening now.

  2. In America, the richest men are taking satisfaction in abandoning the world’s poorest children to sickness and death. This is happening now.

  3. In my country, they’re taking sadistic pleasure in the pain they inflict on loyal American workers.

  4. They’re rolling back historic civil rights legislation that has led to a more just and plural society.

  5. They are abandoning our great allies and siding with dictators against those struggling for their freedom.

  6. They are defunding American universities that won’t bow down to their ideological demands.

  7. They are removing residents off American streets and, without due process of law, are deporting them to foreign detention centers and prisons. This is all happening now.

This is a list devoid of fatty media outrage and flabby distraction — it cuts to the bone of American values in this imperfect republic, and it gets to the heart of the current struggle. 

As Springsteen said: “A majority of our elected representatives have failed to protect the American people from the abuses of an unfit president and a rogue government. They have no concern or idea for what it means to be deeply American.”

This intentionally includes the Republican Congress in the indictment, rightly so. Either cowed by — or under the drunken influence of — MAGA authoritarianism and threats, the GOP is no longer a functioning political party. It is a cult of personality and power redolent of the Europe of the 1930s.

Can a 75-year-old rock star speaking out on a European tour and playing his hits of the last five decades really launch a cultural moment in the pro-democracy opposition to Trump and his gang? 

That’s a tall order indeed, but I have to give Springsteen some significant credit here: for one, he’s out there trying and speaking fiercely and directly. This is not some mealy-mouthed aside to make himself look good. And for another, his long career as a trusted poet of the working class carries weight — which is his authentic origin story even if he’s now an ultra wealthy coastal megastar who moves units mainly to aging college educated people. Finally, he’s an icon, he’s got what Trump would probably think of as “FU money,” he has hundreds of millions of fans, and he’s spending his privilege (as the kids might say in no Springsteen song ever) on taking a mighty stand.

What he needs is more public allies from much broader cultural backgrounds. I found it fascinating that Trump once again went in on Swift and Beyonce, the two most successful acts in the U.S. and perhaps globally — both opposed Trump with a pretty light touch last year, and neither can be described as activists or truly political. Yet their respective fan bases are the most active out there (Beyonce is out on a big tour in support of her excellent Cowboy Carter record), and any kind of true spark that ignites further opposition — particularly among younger people – could have a major impact.

Trump is currently floating in a cosseted bubble of automatic approval from his lickspittle corps of yes men and women. So he feels pretty easy about issuing threats and frankly, seems to believe that both his Justice Department and gangs of followers will follow up on them. Hence the last line in his online tirade on Springsteen: “we’ll all see how it goes for him…”

We will indeed — but I’m glad Springsteen is showing no fear. That’s what matters now.

“The America l’ve sung to you about for 50 years is real and regardless of its faults is a great country with a great people,” said Springsteen in Manchester. “So we’ll survive this moment. Now, I have hope, because I believe in the truth of what the great American writer James Baldwin said. He said, “In this world, there isn’t as much humanity as one would like, but there’s enough.”

Donnie is in a thin-skinned snit.  He can't stand any kind of criticism, especially from credible celebrities with large followings.

Thursday, May 22, 2025

Death of a Cybertruck Salesman: How Trump Singlehandedly Killed Tesla

 












The new MAGA MAN will spend his entire life putting tiny screws in iPhones




(Composite / Photos: GettyImages / Shutterstock)

 substack.com

1. TSLA

How much does it cost to drive a Cybertruck?

The base sticker price for Tesla’s electric truck is $70,000,¹ but that’s not the real cost. The real cost is the depreciation.² When you go to trade in your Cybertruck, how much is it worth?

We have some answers. But before we get to the math, let’s go big-picture: Why should we care about the depreciation on a Tesla?

Because it’s part of a counterrevolution.

When Elon Musk allied with Donald Trump, he transformed his companies into explicitly political projects. Musk leveraged his wealth into political power. In turn, he used that power to carry out a revolution inside the federal government.

If you listen to the MAGAs, their revolution sounds Maoist. They want to depose the elites (researchers, academics, professionals) and create a New Man. This New MAGA Man will eschew decadent knowledge work and instead labor in glorious factories, putting tiny screws into iPhones.³

Mind you, it’s not clear how many of the people in Trump’s orbit believe this stuff. Howard Lutnick and Peter Navarro might. Trump himself cares nothing for ideological projects—he just wants power and money. And Musk seems to want America to be a feudal system.

But sincerity doesn’t really matter. The point is that Musk helped Trump win the election and then became the vanguard carrying out a cultural revolution inside the government. Like a good Maoist, Musk dispatched cadres of young zealots to purge and reeducate on his behalf.

How do you stop such a man? You need a counterrevolution that attacks his power structure. Which in Musk’s case is: Tesla, the company.

The anti-Tesla movement is one of the most successful cases of social coordination in American history. In the span of six months the Tesla brand has been made radioactive.

This isn’t a subjective view. You can see it in the data...

From tea to Teslas: an inflationary, revolutionary tale.

Monday, May 19, 2025

House GOP advances Trump's 'budget betrayal' bill in dead of night

 no image description available

House Speaker Mike Johnson who claims to play it by the Holy Bible.  Holy hypocrite, Mikey!

MAKE AMERICA WHAT AGAIN???  The rich will make $389,000/year while the not-so-rich lose $700/year

Republicans on the House Budget Committee advanced President Donald Trump's "One Big Beautiful Bill" out of committee late Sunday night, after GOP leadership promised the bill would take health care away from poor people sooner.

The hard-liners on the committee, who initially tanked the bill on Friday, voted present on Sunday night—a way for them to let the legislation move forward while still expressing their discontent that the bill doesn’t make more cuts to Medicaid to help pay for the tax cuts that will overwhelmingly benefit the richest few. The bill ultimately advanced by a vote of 17-16.

Reps. Chip Roy of Texas, Josh Brecheen of Oklahoma, Andrew Clyde of Georgia, and Ralph Norman of South Carolina allowed the bill to advance.They said House Speaker Mike Johnson promised them in writing that cuts to Medicaid—the government program that provides health insurance to 72 million low-income Americans annually—will begin earlier than the bill currently states. 

The Medicaid work requirements—which experts say lead to immense administrative costs and will ultimately lead millions of people who should be eligible for the program to lose their coverage due to bureaucratic red tape—would now begin in 2026, rather than 2029, as initially drafted.

Johnson also promised that the bill will cut more of the green energy tax credits Democrats passed in the Inflation Reduction Act, ultimately ending all of the credits by 2028, according to Punchbowl News.

Even with those promises, the House Freedom Caucus, a group of far-right Republicans, still says they are unhappy with the bill—which will increase the deficit by at least $3.3 trillion over the next decade in order to basically only help the richest Americans. In fact, the Penn Wharton Budget Model released data on Friday that found the GOP’s bill would lead people who earn less than $51,000 per year to lose an average of $700 per year, while the top 0.1% of earners—people who make more than $4.3 million annually—would see their incomes rise by $389,000. 

"While progress has been made on advancing the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' out of the Budget Committee, it does not yet meet the moment," the group wrote in a post on X. "As written, the bill continues increased deficits in the near term with possible savings years down the road that may never materialize. Thanks to discussions over the weekend, the bill will be closer to the budget resolution framework we agreed upon in the House in April, but it fails to actually honor our promise to significantly correct the spending trajectory of the federal government and lead our nation towards a balanced budget."

Indeed, Moody’s lowered the country’s credit rating for the first time since 1917, saying their decision, "reflects the increase over more than a decade in government debt and interest payment ratios to levels that are significantly higher than similarly rated sovereigns.” That sent the stock market tumbling, with investors worried about the health of the U.S. economy.

Changes in the bill—which will cause more than 13 million people to lose their insurance, make college more expensive for low-income Americans, cut food aid to 11 million people, and fund Trump’s draconian immigration enforcement—will have to be made in the House Rules Committee, which amends the legislation and sends it to the House floor for a vote before every member of Congress.


Related House GOP sneakily proposes kicking millions of people off Medicaid


But if the House Rules Committee makes these changes, it could create problems with other factions of the House Republican conference. Republicans in competitive districts could balk at the even more draconian Medicaid cuts.

And it's still unclear if the New York and California Republicans, who are currently threatening to tank the bill because it doesn't allow their constituents to deduct more of their state and local taxes, known as SALT, have reached a deal with Johnson. Increasing SALT deduction caps would almost certainly make the bill cost more, which could anger the House Freedom Caucus members.

“Let’s be clear here: A deal isn’t very close,” Punchbowl News, a media outlet that covers the nitty gritty of Congress, wrote. “The changes conservatives are seeking are drastic. Some of these tweaks are clearly unacceptable to moderates and the middle of the conference.”

The House Rules Committee is set to meet at 1 AM on Wednesday—yes, another middle-of-the-night hearing where Americans won’t be awake to see Republicans move to steal from the poor to give to the rich.

“For House Republicans, kicking millions of Americans off their health care wasn't good enough. So, Republicans worked this weekend behind closed doors to jam their budget betrayal through committee at 10pm on a Sunday,” Rep. Brendan Boyle (D-PA), ranking member of the Budget Committee, wrote in a post on X. “I won't stop fighting against this betrayal.”

"Calm down, everyone, Judas Johnson is a very good Christian.  He won't screw over the poor to pad the rich."

Friday, May 16, 2025

Sean Duffy is way too busy decorating to fix air traffic safety crisis

Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy testifies during a Senate Committee on Appropriations Subcommittee budget hearing, Thursday, May 15, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Kevin Wolf)
"We've got Jesus right where we want him (but we lost track of a few airplanes)."  While ignoring the ongoing air safety crisis, Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy defended his decision to switch his wife's flight to avoid airports experiencing operational issues.

In lieu of solving the ever-present issues at the Federal Aviation Administration, Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy has shifted his focus to more pressing matters, like interior decorating. 

Duffy took time out of his Thursday afternoon to publicly announce that he’s moving a painting of Jesus up a few floors at the U.S. Merchant Marine Academy. 

“We are moving Jesus out of the basement!” he exclaimed in a video posted on X. 

Reveling in the strange victory, Duffy told the camera that he worked with the school to move the painting back to a “place of prominence” after being stored in the basement.

While some may be cheering about Duffy’s redecorating project, those stranded in airports waiting for the Trump administration to come up with a solution to the ongoing air safety crisis might be less enthused. 

Late last month, Newark Liberty International Airport faced multiple operational meltdowns that caused air traffic controllers to briefly lose radar images and communication with all aircrafts. And on Monday, Denver had a similarly terrifying outage, with air traffic controllers losing communication for 90 seconds. 

Cartoon by Tim Campbell
A cartoon by Tim Campbell.

While travelers are praying for safe landings—or simply hoping that their flights depart in the first place—Duffy was called out for rerouting his own family away from airports experiencing outages. 

On Wednesday, Duffy defended his decision to move his wife from a flight departing Newark to another leaving LaGuardia Airport in New York.

“With all the delays at Newark—my wife had to do an event and she was in the city of New York, and so I did—I moved her from Newark to LaGuardia not for safety but because I needed her flight to fly. She had to get there,” he said during a House Appropriations Committee hearing.

But as Duffy faces the obvious failings of his own department, he seems to be following in the footsteps of his boss: refusing to take any accountability.

Rather than admitting that the Trump administration’s slashing of the FAA has created a massive air traffic controller shortage, Duffy is pointing the finger elsewhere.

“The infrastructure bill under Joe Biden, $1.2 trillion,” Duffy told Fox News host Martha MacCallum last week. “They sent only $5 billion to fix air traffic control. And of the $5 billion, Pete Buttigieg spent less than $1 billion to fix this problem. Instead, he was focused on racist roads and changing the name of ‘cockpit’ to ‘flight deck’ or ‘air man’ to ‘aeronaut.’ Stupid stuff.”

Stupid stuff, indeed.

Tuesday, May 13, 2025

You can emigrate to Trump's America - as long you are pure white

1st Group of White South Africans Land in US; Trump Claims They Face 'Genocide'  
Afrikaners from South Africa arrive in Dulles, Virginia, on Monday. (photo: Julia Demaree Nikhinson/AP)

“Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free.” Non-whites need not apply.

Nomia Iqbal / BBC News 

ALSO SEE: Episcopal Church Refuses to Resettle White Afrikaners, Citing Moral Opposition

A group of 59 white South Africans has arrived in the US, where they are to be granted refugee status.

President Donald Trump has said the refugee applications for the country's Afrikaner minority had been expedited as they were victims of "racial discrimination".

The South African government said the group were not suffering any such persecution that would merit refugee status.

The Trump administration has halted all other refugee admissions, including for applicants from warzones. Human Rights Watch described the move as a cruel racial twist, saying that thousands of people - many black and Afghan refugees - had been denied refuge in the US.

The group of white South Africans, who landed at Dulles airport near Washington DC on Monday, received a warm welcome from US authorities.

Some held young children and waved small American flags in the arrival area adorned with red, white and blue balloons on the walls.

The processing of refugees in the US often takes months, even years, but this group has been fast tracked. UNHCR - the United Nations refugee agency - confirmed to the BBC it wasn't involved in the vetting, as is usually the case.

Asked directly on Monday why the Afrikaners' refugee applications had been processed faster than other groups, Trump said a "genocide" was taking place and that "white farmers" specifically were being targeted.

"Farmers are being killed, they happen to be white, but whether they're white or black makes no difference to me."

But South African President Cyril Ramaphosa said he told Trump during a phone call the US assessment of the situation was "not true".

"A refugee is someone who has to leave their country out of fear of political persecution, religious persecution, or economic persecution," Ramaphosa said. "And they don't fit that bill."

In response to a question from the BBC at Dulles airport, Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau said: "It is not surprising, unfortunately, that a country from which refugees come does not concede that they are refugees."

The US has criticised domestic South African policy, accusing the government of seizing land from white farmers without any compensation.

In January President Ramaphosa signed a controversial law allowing the government to seize privately owned land without compensation in certain circumstances, when it is deemed "equitable and in the public interest".

But the government says no land has yet been seized under the act.

There has been frustration in South Africa over the slow pace of land reform in the three decades since the end of the racist apartheid system.

While black South Africans make up more than 90% of the population, they only hold 4% of all privately owned land, according to a 2017 report.

One of Trump's closest advisers, South African-born Elon Musk, has previously said there was a "genocide of white people" in South Africa and accused the government of passing "racist ownership laws".

The claims of a genocide of white people have been widely discredited.

In a statement to the BBC, Gregory Meeks, ranking Democratic member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, said the Trump administration's refugee resettlement was "not just a racist dog whistle, it's a politically motivated rewrite of history".

The Episcopal Church said it would no longer work with the federal government on refugee settlement because of the "preferential treatment" granted for the Afrikaners.

Commenting on this news on X, Vice-President JD Vance posted, "Crazy".

Melissa Keaney, a lawyer with the International Refugee Assistance project, told the BBC the White House's decision to fast-track the Afrikaners' arrival amounted to "a lot of hypocrisy and unequal treatment".

Her organisation is suing the Trump administration after it indefinitely suspended the US Refugee Admissions Program (USRAP) in January. She said that policy had left over 120,000 conditionally approved refugees in limbo.

Afrikaner author Max du Preez told the BBC's Newsday radio programme that claims of persecution of white South Africans were a "total absurdity" and "based on nothing".

Figures from the South African police show that in 2024, 44 murders were recorded on farms and smaller plots of agricultural land, with eight of those killed being farmers.

South Africa does not report on crime statistics broken down by race but a majority of the country's farmers are white, while other people living on farms, such as workers, are mostly black.

Bilateral relations between the US and South Africa have been strained since President Trump first tasked his administration with resettling Afrikaners, a group with mostly Dutch ancestry, in the US.

In March, South Africa's ambassador to the US, Ebrahim Rasool, was expelled after accusing President Trump of using "white victimhood as a dog whistle", leading to the US accusing Mr Rasool of "race-baiting".

The US has also criticised South Africa for taking an "aggressive" position against Israel at the International Court of Justice (ICJ), where Pretoria has accused Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government of genocide against Palestinians - a claim the Israelis strongly reject.

President Trump's openness to accepting Afrikaner refugees comes as the US has engaged in a wider crackdown on migrants and asylum seekers from other countries.

"WHITE IS WONDERFUL": See no blacks.  See no browns.  See no tans.  See no yellows.
 

From massive protests to a puny parade, America really let Donald Trump down | Opinion

  All he wanted was to celebrate his birthday with a massive military parade that made him look powerful and beloved. Instead he got a der...