Friday, January 31, 2025

Another side to the plane crash blame game

no image description available
Former U.S. Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg actually doing his job.

After Donald Trump tried to blame Pete Buttigieg for the deadly plane crash in Washington, D.C., the former transportation secretary fired back, defending his service and telling Trump to be an adult and show leadership rather than find a scapegoat in the middle of a horrific tragedy.

"Despicable," Buttigieg wrote in a post on X, referring to Trump's batshit crazy news conference in which he blamed everyone from Buttigieg to former Presidents Barack Obama and Joe Biden, to people with dwarfism for the crash that killed 64 civilians and three members of the military. "As families grieve, Trump should be leading, not lying. We put safety first, drove down close calls, grew Air Traffic Control, and had zero commercial airline crash fatalities out of millions of flights on our watch."

Buttigieg then said Trump bears some of the blame for the crash, as he is in charge and has already taken actions to make the skies less safe.

"President Trump now oversees the military and the [Federal Aviation Administration]," Buttigieg continued. "One of his first acts was to fire and suspend some of the key personnel who helped keep our skies safe. Time for the President to show actual leadership and explain what he will do to prevent this from happening again."

At the time of the crash, there was no head of the FAA, as Trump's co-President Elon Musk had forced out the previous administrator because the FAA fined Musk's company SpaceX.

Trump also gutted an aviation safety committee days before the crash, getting rid of a three-decade-old safety committee that was created by Congress after the 1988 PanAm 103 bombing over Lockerbie, Scotland. Because the committee was created by an act of Congress, Trump couldn’t get rid of it, but he did fire all of its members, which will make the committee unable to do the work of looking into airline safety issues, the Associated Press reported.

Kara Weipz, the president of Victims of Pan Am Flight 103, said a statement that Trump’s gutting of the safety commission, “will undermine aviation security in the United States and across the globe.”

Aside from wrongly blaming Buttigieg, Trump also blamed diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts for the crash—even though he has no evidence that a DEI hire caused the tragic accident. 

When asked by a reporter how he knows that DEI is to blame, Trump replied, “Because I have common sense.”

Ultimately, the investigation into what led to Wednesday night’s tragedy is just beginning. 

But aside from having an idiot in the White House, the two men who helm the agencies tasked with getting to the bottom of what happened—Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth—are also not the brightest tools in the shed. 

Duffy is a former reality TV contestant turned GOP congressman with no transportation experience. And Hegseth is a veteran turned Fox News host with no experience leading a major organization. 

no image description available 

A cartoon by Clay Jones / Daily Kos

Thursday, January 30, 2025

HOW LOW CAN TRUMP GO: Blames DEI, Biden, Obama and Buttigieg for tragic DC air collision

A helicopter flies near the crash site of the American Airlines plane on January 30, 2025, in Arlington, Virginia. Photo: Andrew Harnik/Getty Images

By , senior editor for Intelligencer who has worked at New York Magazine since 2012 
 
REPUBLISHED BY:

An American Airlines passenger jet carrying 64 people collided with an Army helicopter and crashed into the Potomac River on Wednesday night. No one survived the midair collision.

The initial response from the White House was typical. At 10:51 p.m. on Wednesday, Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt released a totally appropriate statement from President Donald Trump.

“I have been fully briefed on the terrible accident which just took place at Reagan National Airport,” it read. “May God Bless their souls. Thank you for the incredible work being done by our first responders. I am monitoring the situation and will provide more details as they arise.”

But less than two hours later, Trump hopped on Truth Social to throw out some wild speculation about the crash. He concluded, “This is a bad situation that looks like it should have been prevented. NOT GOOD!!!”

The overall vibe from his Truth Social posts was more “conspiracist-in-chief” than “consoler-in-chief.” But hey, maybe Trump would pull it together for his Thursday morning press conference? Not quite!

Trump’s press briefing got off to a promising start. He asked for a moment of silence and read a well-written statement expressing sadness over the loss of life and vowing to thoroughly investigate the crash.

But within minutes, the “presidential” mirage dissolved. Trump unleashed an unusually appallingly rant, blaming the crash on Barack Obama, Joe Biden, former Transportation secretary Pete Buttigieg, DEI and people with disabilities.

“I put safety first. Obama, Biden, and the Democrats put policy first, and they put politics at a level that nobody’s ever seen,” Trump said. “They actually came out with a directive: ‘too white.’ And we want the people that are competent.”

In case anyone was unclear, Trump later told a reporter that yes, he was saying diversity hiring could have caused the crash — though he has no evidence to support that outrageous claim.

After Trump spoke, his Transportation secretary, Sean Duffy, explained that the motto of the new administration is “the best and the brightest — the most intelligent coming into these spaces.”

Present company excepted, it seems.

This post was updated after Trump’s press conference.

Wednesday, January 29, 2025

Trump’s latest bimbo press secretary is the corrupt monster he's always wanted

no image description available
Trumps new bimbo press secretary Karoline Leavitt speaks with reporters at the White House, Jan. 22, 2025, in Washington.

At 27, Karoline Leavitt is the youngest White House press secretary since disgraced former President Richard Nixon picked 29-year-old Ronald Ziegler for the same position in 1969 (and the parallels are not lost on us).

Leavitt hit the MAGA-atmosphere during the first Trump administration, where she worked as an assistant press secretary before leaving to become New York Republican Rep. Elise Stefanik’s communications director. 

In the wake of the Jan. 6 insurrection, Leavitt made two social media posts that she has since erased: one that called the officer who tricked insurrectionists into going the wrong way, “A hero,” and another describing the insurrection as, “a dark day in the history of the United States Capitol.”

Like her previous boss Stefanik, Leavitt has been willing to debase herself and pretend any pretense of a conviction she might have had about justice and our constitution was no match for a position in President Donald Trump’s orbit.

A few months after Jan. 6, she was fully on board and promoting debunked election fraud claims on social media.

In 2022, she ran unsuccessfully for a congressional seat in the First District of New Hampshire  before folding herself back into Trump’s 2024 campaign for president. 

In the run-up to the election, Leavitt showed an almost unhinged ability to spin for Trump, unabashedly calling the Trump campaign “disciplined” after every disastrous press conference Trump gave.

In August, she denied that Trump’s campaign had any connections to Project 2025. She was featured in a Project 2025 training video “The Art of Professionalism.”

While Trump and others repeatedly promoted lies about the federal response to Hurricane Helene in North Carolina and elsewhere in 2024, Leavitt showed the kind of shamelessness Trump desires in a mouthpiece. During an appearance on CNN, Leavitt's lies and inability to answer simple fact-checking questions ended with the interview being cut short.

Since the election, and Trump’s announcement that Leavitt would be the next White House press secretary, Leavitt has continued her monomaniacal vigilance to create an alternative reality for her narcissist in chief. After Trump pardoned more than 1,500 Jan. 6 insurrectionists, including seditious conspirators, Leavitt tried to downplay the negative response.

“I don't think it's causing much controversy,” she told Fox News. “President Trump is restoring faith in our justice system,” she added.

A recent investigation from NOTUS shows that about a week ago, Leavitt “amended” campaign filings from her failed 2022 congressional run. It reportedly shows that she failed to disclose, for years, at least $200,000 in “inappropriate donations.” It also shows that she still owes more than $300,000 in unpaid debts. Only the best conartists people.

Leavitt will now join the ranks of other Trump press secretaries. That clowncar includes waste-of-space Sean Spicer, fancy-podium-hoarder Sarah Huckabee Sanders, afraid-of-the-press Stephanie Grisham, and world’s-worst-prognosticator (but another  babe) Kayleigh McEnany.

Leavitt seems a perfect fit for Trump, as her first press conference Tuesday clearly demonstrated.  She even promised to never, ever lie.

DAILY KOS UPDATE BY OLIVER  WILLIS

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt used her first media briefing to promote a lie about U.S. foreign aid spending.

The falsehood came as Leavitt attempted to justify the widely decried and possibly illegal federal spending freeze ordered by President Donald Trump via the Office of Management and Budget.

“DOGE and OMB also found that there was about to be $50 million taxpayer dollars that went out the door to fund condoms in Gaza,” she claimed.

Trump megadonor and Department of Government Efficiency Chair Elon Musk amplified the made-up story on his X account.

“Tip of iceberg,” Musk wrote, later adding, “My guess is that a lot of that money ended up in the pockets [of] Hamas, not actually condoms.”

The attempted attack on the Biden administration is a complete lie. In September, the U.S. Agency for International Development released a report on government spending on  contraception and condom shipments made over the last year. None of the $60.8 million was sent to Gaza or anywhere else in the Middle East.

Despite Leavitt’s attempt to scandalize President Joe Biden’s foreign aid spending on contraception, he wasn’t the only one to do it. During his first term in 2019, Trump spent about $40 million on contraceptive aids as part of international relief expenditures.

The aid package authorized by Biden in September was not nearly as salacious as Leavitt’s rhetoric would indicate. According to USAID, that disbursement to Gaza paid for food assistance, nutrition, emergency health care, access to safe drinking water, and emergency shelters, among other items.

But despite the lie—and Leavitt’s inability to inform the public about how vital services like Medicaid would be affected by the spending freeze—corporate media outlets like The New York Times claimed she had made a “steely and unflinching debut” in her new role. 

“In First White House Briefing, Youngest Press Secretary Ever Eschews Tradition,” a Wall Street Journal headline similarly gushed.

Leavitt opened her briefing by committing to “telling the truth from this podium every single day.” 

But then, of course, she went on to lie. 

Considering the track record of Trump’s former press secretaries—Sean Spicer, Sarah Sanders, and Kayleigh McEnany—there will surely be many more lies to come.

Trump has always had a proclivity for the ladies.

Tuesday, January 28, 2025

Trump quietly raised your prescription prices

 Dems Sound Alarm on Trump’s Quiet Bid to Raise Prescription Prices   

Your Prez has turned his back on you as he makes his billionaire pharmaceutical buds richer at your expense. Donald Trump. (photo: Erin Schaff/NYT/Redux)

 “Trump is making clear who he serves, and it is not the American people.”
 
Nikki McCann Ramirez / Rolling Stone

Donald Trump’s first week in office was defined by a torrent of executive orders and proclamations, with the president openly hailing the beginning of a transformative era of American politics. 

While Trump is more than happy to brag about the orders he’s signed cracking down on undocumented migrants, targeting transgender Americans, and banning DEI, there’s one order he won’t be bragging about any time soon.

Hours after taking office, Trump’s White House announces a bulk repeal of dozens of executive orders and directives signed by former President Joe Biden. Among them were actions lowering health care costs and improving insurance access and quality for Americans. Democrats have taken note.

Executive Order 14087, titled “Lowering Prescription Drug Costs for Americans,” signed by Biden in October 2022 and axed by Trump last week, directed the Department of Health and Human Services to implement new payment models that would lower drug costs — including proposed $2 copays for generic drugs — and improve access to emerging experimental cancer treatments for Medicare and Medicaid enrollees.

Trump also rescinded several other Biden era health care policies, including an expansion of the Affordable Care Act’s open enrollment period for government managed health insurance policies, expanding Medicaid eligibility for postpartum women, and increased health care outreach funding to states.

Democrats responded by calling out Trump’s starting-line repeal of health care policies he publicly claimed to support throughout his campaign.

“He campaigned on bringing down costs for the American people on Day 1 — but he broke that promise on Day 1 when he BLOCKED a program that cut Rx drug prices for seniors and working families, KOWTOWING to his Big Pharma donors,” former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) wrote on X.

Sen. Peter Welch (D-Vt.) questioned why Trump would take executive action that “gives [pharmaceutical companies] a break while raising costs for seniors,” when the “top 10 pharmaceutical companies made more than $500 billion in profit last year.”

Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) noted on X: “Pharma CEOs dined with Donald Trump at Mar-a-Lago. Billionaires sat in the front row of his inauguration. And, on Day 1, Trump killed a Biden program to guarantee $2 generic drugs for seniors.

“Trump is making clear who he serves, and it is not the American people,” he added.

“By undoing actions to lower prescription drug costs on Day One, President Trump is making it clear that his presidency will be a golden age for billionaires and big corporations, not for hardworking families,” Sen. Jacky Rosen (D-Nev.) wrote on social media.

In a statement to Rolling Stone, Adam Green — co-founder of the Progressive Change Institute — said: “Democrats are showing a big lesson learned in the aftermath of the 2024 election. They’re picking clean fights with Donald Trump that position him as corruptly betraying working families while Democrats are challenging corporate greed on behalf of working families.”

While Democrats hold the minority in both chambers of Congress, their ability to legislatively counter Trump’s agenda is all but nonexistent. They can, however, ensure the American public knows exactly who is screwing them over.

Yeah, he actually said this.  When will MAGAs realize they got taken yet again by America's greatest con artist.

Monday, January 27, 2025

House Republicans cave to Trump on Jan. 6 pardons

How Republicans Learned to Excuse Political Violence  
Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R-La.)  What a phony Christian bastard this guy turned out to be.  God, if you're watching, please come take him away. (photo: Kent Nishimjura/Getty)  
 
Here's how Republicans rationalized crossing this line

Will Saletan / The Bulwark

HOW DOES A POLITICAL PARTY get comfortable with the use of violence? How does a constitutional democracy drift toward authoritarianism? The answers are right in front of us. It’s happening in the United States.

On Monday, his first day back in the White House, President Donald Trump ordered an end to the incarceration or prosecution of anyone involved in the January 6th insurrection. He granted commutations, with instructions for instant release, to fourteen people convicted of seditious conspiracy or other crimes related to orchestrating the attack. He also issued “a full, complete and unconditional pardon to all other individuals convicted of offenses related to events that occurred at or near the United States Capitol on January 6, 2021.”

Hundreds of people had pleaded guilty to, or had been convicted of, assaulting police officers in the attack. Many of their crimes were recorded on video. Trump pardoned them all.

This wasn’t what Republican leaders had expected. In the week before Trump took office, House Speaker Mike Johnson and Vice President-elect JD Vance had signaled that the pardons wouldn’t extend to those who committed violent crimes. So when Trump crossed that line, congressional Republicans had to decide whether to join him.

With few exceptions, they have.

This is a significant moment in the transformation of our country. The party that controls the presidency and both houses of Congress—emboldened by a Republican-appointed Supreme Court majority that has granted Trump broad immunity from prosecution—is exempting its supporters from accountability for political violence, including assaults against police.

How have Republicans rationalized crossing this line? Let’s examine some of their excuses.

1. I support whatever Trump does.

“It’s the president’s sole decision,” Johnson declared on Tuesday. “And he made a decision, so I stand with him on it.”

That’s the authoritarian spirit. No matter what the leader does, his allies fall in line.

2. The pardons show Trump is a man of his word.

“He talked about that during the campaign,” Steve Scalise, the House majority leader, told reporters when they asked about Trump’s pardons for people who assaulted police. “President Trump is a man of his word. He’s going to follow through on his commitments.”

This, too, is the language of autocracy. The moral content of the leader’s threat or act is irrelevant. What matters is that he deserves praise for following through on his threats.

3. This is what the people voted for.

In a CNN interview on Wednesday, Senator Markwayne Mullin noted that during the 2024 campaign, Trump “did not hide that he was going to pardon January 6th individuals.” By electing Trump, Mullin argued, Americans gave Trump a mandate to do just that: “The American people [on] November 5th chose to move on past January 6th.”

This is the easiest way to unravel a constitutional democracy: You turn democracy against the constitution, by claiming that an election gave the winner a mandate to suspend or ignore laws. In reality, Americans gave Trump no such mandate. Multiple polls have found that they oppose pardons for people convicted of violent crimes on January 6th.

4. The real villain is the FBI.

This is one of Trump’s favorite fictions: that the January 6th convicts are “hostages” of “weaponized” law enforcement agencies. Many congressional Republicans have joined him in peddling this lie.

“I support the president’s decision” on the pardons, Rep. James Comer, the chairman of the House Oversight Committee, declared Wednesday on CNN. Comer explained, “There’s a significant percentage of Americans, especially conservative Americans, that believe that many of those rioters were enticed by undercover FBI agents and people within the FBI. The FBI has not been forthcoming.”

This smear against the FBI has been thoroughly debunked. But that hasn’t stopped Comer and his colleagues from using it to whitewash the insurrection and justify the pardons. They’re doing what propagandists do in autocratic regimes: spreading conspiracy theories to rewrite history.

5. The real scofflaw is Joe Biden.

This is the most common Republican rejoinder to questions about Trump’s pardons. “Biden opened the door on this,” said Senate Majority Leader John Thune, blaming the outgoing president for his last-minute grants of clemency. That’s not true: Trump began talking about his January 6th pardons more than two years before Biden’s late burst of pardons and commutations.

Many Republicans suggested that Biden’s pardons were worse than Trump’s. Senator Susan Collins claimed that Biden gave “a pardon to an individual who killed two FBI agents,” referring to American Indian activist Leonard Peltier. Mullin accused Biden of pardoning cop killers and other violent offenders.

This is standard whataboutism. It’s also false. None of Biden’s last-minute pardons were for violent crimes. Most of them weren’t even for crimes. They were preemptive, to protect people who had been threatened with prosecution by Trump and other Republicans for nonexistent crimes.

Peltier, who was convicted of killing two FBI agents fifty years ago, got a commutation, not a pardon. For Biden, this distinction was important. He commuted the sentences of some violent offenders, giving life-in-prison sentences to nearly all federal death row inmates. (Peltier, who is now 80 years old, had a life sentence, the remainder of which he will now serve in home confinement.) But Biden consistently refused to pardon people convicted of violent crimes. The only such pardon he issued was to a woman who shot her husband nearly fifty years ago, allegedly in self-defense, for beating her when she was pregnant.

Trump has rejected Biden’s distinction. He has given pardons, not commutations, to nearly all the violent criminals of January 6th. This is wholly unprecedented.

6. God has cleansed the assailants.

At a press conference on Wednesday, Johnson was asked about the pardons for rioters who assaulted police. He defended them, explaining, “It’s kind of my ethos, my worldview. We believe in redemption. We believe in second chances.”

Johnson’s ethos lasted less than a minute. As he continued speaking, he called Biden’s pardons “disgusting” and made the case for deporting “illegal aliens who are criminals.” Johnson doesn’t believe in second chances. He believes in selective legal immunity for Trumpists.

Johnson’s invocation of the Christian doctrine of redemption is a sham. Real redemption requires repentance, and most of the January 6th assailants haven’t repented. But Johnson doesn’t fuss about that. He’s just using religion as a political shield for Trump.

7. It’s not my department.

Every authoritarian regime needs cowards who look the other way. The GOP is full of such people. “The president’s made his decision. I don’t second-guess those,” Johnson told reporters at his press conference. When Senator John Cornyn was asked about the pardons for violent offenders, he responded: “That’s not the question. The question is who has the authority. And the president has the authority.”

Trump’s secretary of state, Marco Rubio, has his own version of this evasion. “I’m not going to engage in domestic political debates,” he stipulated when he was asked about the pardons on NBC’s Today show. “My job is to focus on the president’s foreign policy.” Imagine how Rubio will be received when he urges other countries, hypocritically, to respect the rule of law.

8. I didn’t see what happened.

Many Republicans, such as Senators Ron Johnson and Rick Scott, ducked questions about the pardons by pleading that they hadn’t yet studied the “details” of each case. Senator Tommy Tuberville, after boasting that Trump was absolutely right to “pardon everyone,” refused to back down when reporters cited specific assailants who had beaten police with weapons. “I don’t believe it, because I didn’t see it,” Tuberville told them.

This see-no-evil farce culminated on Wednesday, when Congressman Tim Burchett questioned whether the people pardoned by Trump were “truly violent.”

“I don’t know that,” Burchett insisted during a CNN interview as video of the assault played on the screen. At that point, CNN’s Jim Acosta interjected: “What do you mean, you don’t know? We’re showing the footage on the air right now.”

9. I’m not a lawyer.

Pleading ignorance of the facts, when the facts are right there on video, might not work forever. So Republicans have devised a backup dodge: pleading ignorance of the law. When Acosta pressed Burchett about whether it was right to release the violent January 6th offenders, Burchett shrugged, “I don’t know if it is or not. I’m not a lawyer.”

This is a variant of the Republican shtick that medical or environmental questions can’t be answered because “I’m not a doctor” or “I’m not a scientist.” In this case, it’s a pretext to ignore obvious lawbreaking.

10. Let’s not dwell on the past.

“We’re not looking backwards, we’re looking forward,” Thune told reporters when he was asked about the pardons. Johnson used the same line, word for word. Senator Kevin Cramer went further, depicting the pardons as a cleansing act. “For the greater good, he did it to move forward,” Cramer said of Trump. He suggested that Trump’s pardons, paired with Biden’s, could “get us to a fresh start.”

In countries where grave crimes were committed, such as South Africa, the idea of seeking a fresh start is understandable. But that requires confession and repentance. It also requires forgiveness, which can be granted only by the victims.

A regime that regains power, admits nothing, whitewashes its crimes, and pardons its thugs isn’t healing the past. It’s laying the groundwork for more crimes.

AMERICANS LIKE TO THINK there’s something special about our country that keeps us free. But that freedom is guaranteed only on paper. All it takes to dismantle our constitutional system and our liberties is one bully and a party full of cowards. The cowards can find excuses to do whatever the bully wants, including the suspension of laws.

There’s no sudden epiphany. You don’t wake up one day and discover that you’re living in an authoritarian state. You get there one step at a time. This week, we took a big step.

Here they come, back to a street near you.


Sunday, January 26, 2025

ENOUGH! California just might pull out of U.S.

 

Secession proponents get green light to move toward ‘Calexit’

Story by Justin Rohrlich
9h3 min read
1-26-25

REPUBLISHED BY:

Californians could vote to secede from the union as early as 2028, now that organizers have received official permission to begin to collect signatures on the initiative.

Secretary of State Shirley Weber announced Thursday that Marcus Ruiz Evans, the central proponent of the measure, must collect at least 546,651 signatures from registered voters — 5 percent of the total votes cast for governor in the November 2022 general election — in order for it to be included on the November 2028 ballot.

Ruiz Evans, a Fresno resident, has until July 22, 2025 to submit the signatures to county election officials, according to Weber’s announcement.

“Calexit means that our laws are determined by the people of California and not unelected bureaucrats in Washington that we didn’t elect,” Ruiz Evans’ website states.

“It means that we get a government that begins and ends at the borders of California. It means an end to the money siphoned from the pockets of California taxpayers. Most importantly, it means that for the first time in our lives we control our own destiny,” the statement added.

Ruiz Evans, who has been angling for secession since 2012, is a staunch Donald Trump opponent, unlike his former partner in the effort, who has now abandoned the project after years of attempts.

He told The Independent that the two parted ways over polarizing political differences that were impossible to overcome, and described being questioned by FBI agents at his front door about Louis Marinelli, a staunch Trumper and Buffalo, New York native whose secessionist activities were allegedly funded by Russian intelligence.

Marinelli has said he had no idea that Aleksandr Ionov, his alleged Russian benefactor, was linked to the Kremlin’s security services until after Ionov and a handful of others were indicted by the feds in 2023.

“People think if you’re a secessionist, you’re crazy,” Ruiz Evans said on Saturday. “I hate Donald Trump,” he added. “I am full-blooded Mexican. The day he went on TV and said all Mexicans are rapists, I said, ‘He can go f*** himself.’ “

He added: “When I see Trump pick on women, on LGBTQ people … my family left Texas for California to escape that. And when I look at Trump, it reminds me of all the horror stories my mom and my grandma told me from [the time] before they left.”

California is not only the most populous state in the U.S., but also its wealthiest, with the fifth-largest economy in the world, according to the International Monetary Fund.

Trump has proposed adding conditions to federal aid for California to help it rebuild after devastating wildfires that ravaged the state that have been linked to climate change and fossil fuel uses, championed by Trump.

The president continues to pick fights with California Governor Gavin Newsome, calling the Democrat “Newscum” in social media posts and at press conferences.

Ruiz Evans told The Independent that Californians are outraged by Trump’s electoral victory following the January 6, 2021 insurrection, and he believes he can rally support to make his dream a reality.

The Independent is the world’s most free-thinking news brand, providing global news, commentary and analysis for the independently-minded. We have grown a huge, global readership of independently minded individuals, who value our trusted voice and commitment to positive change. Our mission, making change happen, has never been as important as it is today.

WE DON'T HAVE TO TAKE IT ANYMORE: California may take the world's fifth largest economy and leave home. 

Saturday, January 25, 2025

WHY HE WINS: Trump Doesn’t Believe Anything

Like the way he ropes in Christians who should know better by angelically posing with an upside down Bible - his otherwise adulterous behavior be damned - or should we say "undamned"?

Dirty-double-dealing allows Trump to pretend to give something to everyone

Yair Rosenberg / The Atlantic


Last week, President-Elect Donald Trump nominated Morgan Ortagus, a longtime State Department official, to serve as a deputy special envoy for Middle East peace—and immediately undercut her. “Early on Morgan fought me for three years, but hopefully has learned her lesson,” Trump wrote when he announced her hire on Truth Social. “These things usually don’t work out, but she has strong Republican support, and I’m not doing this for me, I’m doing it for them.”

 It might seem bizarre for an executive to employ someone they consider at odds with their agenda. But there is a design behind this seeming dysfunction, and it reflects one of Trump’s strengths: He is a nakedly transactional coalition leader with few, if any, core beliefs. This enables him to balance the demands of opposing constituencies without alienating them. Because Trump has few real commitments, he can take contradictory positions and appease rival factions—in this case, hiring a member of the GOP establishment that he has assailed as “freaks,” “warmongers,” and “neocons”—without paying a price for inconsistency. On the contrary, Trump’s unapologetic amorality is a proven electoral asset that allows him to do things other politicians cannot.

Trump’s transparent transactionalism permits him to assimilate the anti-vaccine support base of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. into his camp while simultaneously trumpeting the success of Operation Warp Speed, with both sides believing they can leverage the president-elect to their advantage. It enabled Trump to deliver anti-abortion Supreme Court justices for the religious right but then declare on the 2024 campaign trail that he wouldn’t ban abortion—and to have voters believe him, because they rightly surmised that Trump genuinely doesn’t care about the issue. In the same way, Trump was able to say that he recognized Jerusalem as Israel’s capital “for the evangelicals” and then appeal to Dearborn, Michigan, as the “peace” candidate who might one day do something for Muslims.

On most issues, Trump has no principles, and even on subjects where it seems like he might—such as China—he has shown remarkable flexibility, as when he moved to ban TikTok in his first term but then about-faced after one of the platform’s chief investors became a top donor. Because Trump believes nothing, he holds out the tantalizing prospect that he could do anything, and many people are willing to take him up on the offer.

Such overt double-dealing allows Trump to manage the many contradictions of his coalition by giving something to everyone: evangelical Zionists and Muslim anti-Zionists; Jewish conservatives and anti-Semitic white nationalists; devout Christians and libertine Barstool bros; elite Silicon Valley moguls and working-class union members. Outsiders look at Trump’s supporters and see an unruly rabble riven with irreconcilable tensions. But they miss what makes the entire operation tick.

By contrast, Democrats and most traditional politicians sell everything they do under a banner of moral conviction and coherence, which makes deviations from ideology hard to countenance, difficult to sell to the base, and unconvincing to the people they’re meant to reach. Vice President Kamala Harris was dogged throughout her decidedly moderate 2024 campaign by past progressive stances precisely because voters expected her positions to be consistent and reflect a principled worldview. As a result, she reaped the worst of both worlds: The left was disappointed in her defections from orthodoxy even while many swing voters did not buy them.

Likewise, presidential candidates such as Mitt Romney and John Kerry were branded as flip-floppers for their shifts on key issues such as abortion and the Iraq War. Successful politicians avoid this fate by presenting their policy pirouettes as authentic “evolution,” but thanks to his unabashed reputation as a self-interested cynic in it for his own advantage, Trump is relieved of the need to even pretend.

Of course, we demand moral consistency from our politicians for a reason. A politics empty of principle, in which everything is for sale, breeds corruption and public nihilism about the ability of democracy to deliver on its promises. That said, today’s politicians might take a less corrosive lesson from Trump: that there is value in honestly acknowledging the compromises inherent in governance rather than concealing them behind a mask of sanctimony that will inevitably slip. Balancing competing interests is what politics is about. The problems arise when those trade-offs are made in service of the leader, not the people.

Regardless of whether Trump’s mercenary approach to politics is good for the country, it has undoubtedly been good for him. Ironically, after failing as a businessman in Atlantic City, the president-elect has finally succeeded in creating a casino at the White House where everyone wants in on the action.

One thing Trump does believe in: surrounding himself with comely bimbos.

 

Friday, January 24, 2025

Fox News melts down over 'woke bishop' who called on Trump to show mercy

 Rev. Mariann Budde leads the national prayer service attended by President Donald Trump at the Washington National Cathedral, Tuesday, Jan. 21, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci) 

Rev. Mariann Budde leads the national prayer service attended by President Donald Trump at the Washington National Cathedral, Tuesday, Jan. 21, 2025, in Washington.

Fox News has gone all-in on attacking Right Rev. Mariann Budde, the Episcopal bishop who delivered the national prayer service at National Cathedral on Tuesday and called for compassion for LGBTQ+ people and migrants.

In her sermon, Budde asked Trump to “have mercy.” Trump panned the event as “not too exciting.” He later posted an angrier complaint on his Truth Social Platform, writing, “The so-called Bishop who spoke at the National Prayer Service on Tuesday morning was a Radical Left hard line Trump hater. She brought her church into the World of politics in a very ungracious way.”

Fox News echoed Trump’s invective throughout its broadcast day, targeting Budde for her views and her physical appearance.

“Fox and Friends” host Lawrence Jones exclaimed “Oh my God!” after a clip of Budde’s speech was aired. “As someone who comes from generations of preachers, I would have walked out,” he added.

Jones said it was not an “appropriate” time for Budde to speak out and that she should have done so in private.

His co-host Ainsley Earhardt worried that “there are children there that are hearing this message,” apparently concerned that children might hear something about “mercy” toward others in a church—something frequently associated with Jesus Christ and Christianity.

Also on the panel, host Steve Doocy suggested that the sermon was a sign that the president and other Washington officials should stop attending services at National Cathedral.

On “Outnumbered,” host (and former Trump press secretary) Kayleigh McEnany (Blog Editor's note: You will remember this Trump bimbo from his previous administration) complained that Budde was “preaching politics from the pulpit” (something Fox News has encouraged for decades with conservative policy).

Her co-host Harris Faulkner suggested that rhetoric like Budde’s reflected poorly on the Episcopalian church’s decision to allow women to serve as clergy.  (Blog Editor's note: Damn, another uppity woman who thinks she's entitled to an opinion.)

“It was so awkward not to have a faith-filled, forward-looking positive message at a time when we know the numbers of people going to church are falling again,” Faulkner lamented.  (Blog Editor's note: I, for one, would be more likely to attend her church.)

Panelist Gerri Willis said the message was evidence that Protestantism has “gone woke.”

“There seems to be such an emphasis on the issues of wokeism, whether it’s helping people of different race or different sexual persuasion or whatever, instead of focusing on The Word,” Willis added.

Summarizing the panel’s take on the event Faulkner said, “If you believe in the Lord, that was offensive.” (Blog Editor's note: Not the way I understand the Lord.)

“The Five” co-host Jeanine Pirro labeled Budde as a “woke bishop” and “nasty clergywoman,” and accused her of “hijacking” the service. 

In prime time, host Laura Ingraham kept the insults flying, calling Budde a “Peter Pan lookalike” and referring to her as a “warrior-princess waif.”

Her fellow prime-time host and infamous misogynist Jesse Watters called Budde the Democratic Party’s “new Avenger.” He then asked, “Would the bishop show mercy if someone showed up to her church service, cut the line at Communion, guzzled the blood of Christ, flipped over the body of Christ, and then snatched all the cash from the offering plate?” (Blog Editor's note: A tad more criminal than asking for mercy methinks.)

Despite the attacks from the sitting president and his cheerleaders at the right-wing cable news channel, Budde remained unbowed.

"I don't hate the president, and I pray for him,” Budde told NPR. “I don't feel there's a need to apologize for a request for mercy.”  (Blog Editor's note: Amen. women and all other sexual persuasions.)

Coming to His rescue and making God proud.



Lying JD Vance Falsely Claims Federal Judges ‘Aren’t Allowed’ to Control President

The Evil Triumvirate enjoys a laugh at the expense of the Constitution.    "Ignoring cour...