Sunday, February 28, 2021

CPAC COUNTERPOINT: With conservatives, it's always someone else's fault

  

CPAC ends with an ignominious fate for the GOP's Golden Cow.  Hauled to a ramshackle warehouse for the special rate of $19.95, only to be dusted off and reincarnated again next year.  (Notice the bottom of the statue.  It is clearly plastic.)

For a crowd that pretends to stand for “personal responsibility,” the right-wingers and so-called conservatives who make up the Republican Party sure seem to have a weird aversion to admitting their own mistakes.

This latest fiasco in Texas is just one of nearly daily examples. Somehow we’re supposed to believe that New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who was probably about five years old when the modern Texas power grid was put into place, is responsible for millions of Texans suffering without power this week. Somehow we’re supposed to blame the complete lack of winterization of the same power grid—a task solely within the control of Texas’ Republican legislature and governors for the past two decades—is failing because of the “Green New Deal,” a law that doesn’t exist now and has never existed. Somehow renewable energy, which supplies a measly 10% of all Texas power plant consumption, is at fault.

Sen. Ted Cruz jaunts off to Cancun, leaving his Texas constituents to fend for themselves without power in subzero temperatures. But it’s not like he’s responsible: No, he’s blaming his kids.

This is really quite the pattern lately. Let’s start in reverse order, shall we?

Thousands of people wearing Trump garb and using Trump flags as weapons assault the U.S. Capitol. Most of them are caught on film and boasting about their insurrection on social media. Upon arrest, most of them claim they were lured into attacking the Capitol by Donald Trump. As a result, five people die.

Who does the conservative media say caused the riots? “Antifa!”

Trump gets his ass kicked in the 2020 election. Could it have been a) because of the hundreds of thousands of dead Americans?; b) because he showed not a shred of empathy?; c) because he was the most criminal, racist, misogynistic, incompetent president in American history?; d) because he had no achievements to speak of that helped the American people?; or e) all of the above?

No, it was “Election fraud! Stop the Steal! Dominion!”

Over 500,000 people in this country, more than any other, die from the novel coronavirus. Trump was president for the vast majority of those deaths, and his lackeys were in charge of coordinating a federal response.

Who is responsible? “China! The World Health Organization!” 

Who should get the blame? “Andrew Cuomo!” Why? Because New York nursing homes!” 

Would that have changed anything about the federal response? “Didn’t you hear me? Andrew Cuomo!!!”

Meanwhile, unemployment, hunger, and evictions skyrocket as businesses close. Could it be because of Trump’s gross mismanagement of the worst pandemic ever to hit the country? “No, it’s the Democratic governors!“

Why? “Because they should have left their businesses open!.” Wouldn’t that have doubled the number of deaths? “No! Hoax! Flu!”

Trump is impeached. Is it because he tried to extort a false story out of Ukraine to damage Joe Biden? And that was akin to bribery? And he tried to cover it up? 

No, it’s because of “Hunter Biden. It’s all on a laptop somewhere ... We’ll get back to you.”

Millions of people protest in the streets of America for Black Lives Matter. Why are they protesting? Maybe because of bad, violent, racist cops? “No, it’s Black people’s fault cops use so much force! Portland! Blue Lives Matter! Portland! Antifa! Look, they broke a window in Portland?”

Republicans get hammered in the 2018 midterms despite gerrymandering the entire country. Was it because a) of Donald Trump; b) they had no ideas except tax cuts for mega-corporate CEOs; c) Donald Trump; or d) Donald Trump? “No, none of those reasons, and to prove it we’re going to double down on Donald Trump!“

It goes on and on. Global financial collapse? “It was all the fault of poor Black people buying houses they couldn’t afford!”

Katrina?“It was that Black mayor’s fault! He should have used the schoolbuses!”

Just once, I’d like to hear a conservative say, “Man, we really f*cked up, or “Totally our fault, folks,” or “We made a big mistake here.”

But that may never happen. Because being a member of the “personal responsibility” party means you’re never, ever responsible for anything.

Old white guys, old white guys, and more old white guys.  Where's "Little" Marco Rubio when you need him?  Or the renowned brain surgeon Dr. Ben Carson?  Or that breath of fresh bigotry and sedition Marjorie Taylor Greene?

Saturday, February 27, 2021

CPAC gold Trump statue seems to be asking: Are Trump supporters really this stupid?

 

"And the inevitable comparisons to the Old Testament story of the Israelites worshiping a false idol in the form of a golden calf spread across social media faster than you can say 'Moses.'”  See image of perhaps the most famous stupid Trump supporter below...

The Capitol insurrection was less than two months ago, and in that time, Jacob Chansley—who calls himself the “Q Shaman” and helped lead a violent takeover of the Capitol in a furry Viking hat and face paint—has come around to repudiating Donald Trump, even as Sen. Mitch McConnell has come around to embracing Trump.

It’s time to stop saying “I never thought I’d see this,” because everything is possible now ...

… including Republicans erecting literal golden idols of their slovenly god-king.

If God doesn’t flush Orlando down a fucking sinkhole this weekend, then Sodom and Gomorrah deserve a huge apology. Of course, we’re not here to praise Donald Trump, but to bury Taco Bell sporks in our rheumy eyeballs if he somehow becomes a viable political force again. 

Back to that former MAGA and QAnon adherent who is apparently calling bullshit on Trump’s shtick. Of course, he’s only doing so to stay out of prison, but hey, it’s something.

Newsweek:

“QAnon Shaman” Jacob Chansley claims that former President Donald Trump used social media and "public propaganda" to "effectively groom" his followers into believing conspiracy theories.

Chansley, also known by his stage name Jake Angelli, argued that he was one of millions tricked by the former president in a motion seeking to secure his pretrial release on Tuesday. Chansley is facing a potentially lengthy prison sentence for his alleged role in the deadly January 6 breach of the U.S. Capitol. Chansley insists that he believed he was "lawfully answering the call of the President" at the time that he and many others illegally entered the building.

Tricksey hobbitses! Theys makes us hates Nancy with their lies, precious!

Filthy Bagginses! 

In the motion, Chansley’s lawyer Albert Watkins argued on his client’s behalf, writing: “For years during the Trump administration, the president honed and routinely utilized his mass communication means to effectively groom millions of Americans with respect to his policies, protocols, beliefs and overwhelming fixation on all matters conspiratorial.”

Gee, ya think?

Watkins continued: “Months before the 2020 presidential election, former President Trump heightened his public propaganda such as to alarm, alert, and amass his supporters and cause them to be concerned about an inevitable voter fraud being perpetrated upon the United States of America and, in turn, theft of our nation, loss of our democracy, and the seating of a falsely/fraudulently elected individual other than former President Trump.”

Yeah, this was obvious to most people sitting around their living rooms in pelts and Viking horns on Jan. 6, but apparently Chansley was a little less savvy than his fellow cosplayers.

So there you have it. Republicans in Congress and elsewhere are now officially more far gone than a man who calls himself the “Q Shaman.”

I never thought I’d see … ah, fuck. Never mind. 

But seriously, God: Do what you gotta do. And just so you know, we’re using low-flow sinkholes now, so you may have to flush 15 times.

WASHINGTON, DC - JANUARY 06: A protester yells inside the Senate Chamber on January 06, 2021 in Washington, DC. Congress held a joint session today to ratify President-elect Joe Biden's 306-232 Electoral College win over President Donald Trump. Pro-Trump protesters entered the U.S. Capitol building during mass demonstrations in the nation's capital. (Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)

What can we say about this buffoon that hasn't already been said?

Friday, February 26, 2021

Long buried report shows Trump knew Saudi prince bin Salman murdered journalist Jamal Khashoggi

28 June 2019, Japan, Osaka: Donald Trump (l), President of the United States of America (USA), and Mohammed bin Salman bin Abdelasis al-Saud, Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia, stand side by side in the group picture at the start of the G20 summit. The heads of state and government of the 19 leading industrialised and emerging countries and the European Union will meet at the G20 summit in Osaka (Japan) on 28 and 29 June 2019. Photo by: Bernd von Jutrczenka/picture-alliance/dpa/AP Images
Trump and Mohammed bin Salam share a wink and a nod.  By the time this picture was taken, Trump had been sitting on the report showing bin Salam was a murderer for almost a year.

In October of 2018, Washington Post columnist Jamal Khashoggi stepped into a Saudi embassy in Istanbul to deal with what was supposed to be routine paperwork related to his upcoming marriage. His fiancĂ©e was waiting outside. He never returned.

Though it took months for the details of the story to emerge, it was clear almost from the beginning that Khashoggi has been the victim of Saudi usurper—and friend to both Donald Trump and Jared Kushner—Mohammed bin Salman. When more of the story did emerge, it could not have been more disturbing. It showed how bin Salman dispatched a murder squad to intercept Khashoggi, beat him, torture him, dismember him, and then murder him … in that order. When the journalist was dead, a member of the team that had killed him donned his clothing and walked around Istanbul in an effort to plant a false trail. Finally, it seems that Khashoggi’s remains were burned in an oven specially created for that purpose. 

Thursday, Feb 25, 2021 · 12:19:32 PM MST · Mark Sumner

I have no information to go along with this, but …

As the horrific details emerged, Donald Trump continued to stand by bin Salman. Trump refused to sanction the “Crown Prince”—who inserted himself into that position after conducting an internal coup that saw multiple members of his own family either killed or sent into exile. Trump also refused to produce a required report about the murder, saying he had a “right to refuse” the clear letter of the law. 

There may be no better signal of how President Joe Biden is returning justice to America’s foreign policy than this: On Thursday, the White House will finally release the report. And it clearly shows bin Salman is responsible for the murder of American resident Jamal Khashoggi.

As CNN reported on Wednesday, court documents from a civil suit filed in Canada included documents explicitly showing bin Salman’s orders to send the hit team after Khashoggi. Those documents show how the murder squad—which came prepared with bone saws and other tools to both torture the journalist and take his body apart when it was all over—was dispatched using a private aviation company that bin Salman took over just months before. This private fleet of planes gave bin Salman the capacity he needed to get a 15-man team in and out of Istanbul without having to line his bloody killers up for seats on a commercial aircraft.

It’s just one more piece of evidence in an case that was already definitive in showing how bin Salman ordered the hit against Khashoggi, arranged the gruesome details, and gloated over his success. After which Trump and Kushner refused to hold him to account, with Kushner advising the crown murderer to just lay low for a bit until the press got distracted by other events. Trump certainly did not allow the murder of a U.S. resident journalist to get in the way of making enormous arms sales to bin Salman

But as NBC News reports, Thursday will see a big shift in the relationship between the United States and the man currently calling the shots in Saudi Arabia. That’s because the U.S. will release a report that clearly shows how bin Salman approved and directed the murder of Khashoggi.

According to NBC’s sources, this is not a new report. This is the report that Trump refused to release in 2018. That means that this report isn’t just a condemnation of bin Salman, it’s also another strong condemnation of Trump.

Trump knew all along that his pal bin Salman was a raging murderer. But then, Trump didn’t care, just as he didn’t care that bin Salman oversaw a growing number of executions each year, with hundreds of people being beheaded, hung, or crucified for defying his reign. For one thing, Trump likes seeing people executed. For another, bin Salman “pays in cash.” Trump doesn’t consider bin Salman a bad guy just because he seized control illegally, chased down members of his own family, carried out a brutal proxy war in which thousands of children have died, and went to enormous lengths to carry out the murder of a journalist that included cutting off the man’s fingers one by one. Trump considers bin Salman a role model.

But he’s not a model of what anyone should consider a just leader or a reliable ally. As Reuters reports, the report—which has until now been hidden behind a Top Secret stamp applied under Trump—makes clear bin Salman’s complicity in the torture and murder of Khashoggi. The release of the report signals not just that the United States holds bin Salman personally responsible for this death, but that the nation will be reexamining its relationship with the government in Riyadh and their horrendous record on human rights.

Bin Salman still has plenty of leftover U.S. bombs for attacking more civilian areas of Yemen. He’s also unlikely to ever face justice for the murder of Jamal Khashoggi. But at least the United States won’t be hurrying back to kiss his feet any time soon.

Mohammed bin Salam's clown.

 

Thursday, February 25, 2021

Chance of reaching herd immunity in the next 6 weeks seems real, as vaccine production increases

WASHINGTON, DC - FEBRUARY 22:  (L-R) U.S. President Joe Biden, first lady Jill Biden, Vice President Kamala Harris and husband Doug Emhoff participate in a moment of silence at sundown in the South Portico of the White House February 22, 2021 in Washington, DC. The four held a candlelight ceremony to mark the more than 500,000 lives lost in the U.S. to COVID-19 since the pandemic hit.  (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)
President Joe Biden, first lady Jill Biden, Vice President Kamala Harris, and second gentleman Doug Emhoff participate in a moment of silence at sundown in the South Portico of the White House Feb. 22, 2021 in Washington, D.C.

On Wednesday, the official number of U.S. deaths from COVID-19 recorded at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) dashboard is still hovering just below 500,000. However, several other tracking sites have cleared that awful number by a considerable margin. So on Monday, President Joe Biden held a memorial for the half a million Americans who have lost their lives to this disease.

With a Marine Corps band playing “Amazing Grace” and 500 candles blazing beneath the South Portico, Biden used his own experience with loss to speak directly to a nation where far, far too many are grieving. "I know all too well that black hole in your chest,” said Biden. “You feel like you're being sucked into it. The survivor's remorse. The anger. The questions of faith in your soul … I know it's hard. I promise you, I remember."

Biden’s incredible empathy and sincere emotion was extremely moving, and may be one of the most vital aspects of moving forward in a nation where, for many, the real cost of this pandemic has still not hit home. After all, the most deadly month of this pandemic was not a year ago, or even six months ago. It was January. And despite (thankfully) declining numbers, February is likely to finish just behind last December in terms of American deaths.

Things are getting better. But things are still awful. Which is why other news is so, so welcome.

Biden’s memorial to half a million lost

It took almost exactly one month to go from 400,000 dead to 500,000. However, with falling rates of new cases and dropping hospitalization, there’s a good chance that the total number of American dead in the pandemic will come in at fewer than 700,000. Possibly even below 600,000. Those are still hideous numbers—almost exactly matching the 1918-1919 flu pandemic. But they are certainly a break from where the nation appeared to be headed in January.

25 million free masks going out to food pantries and community centers

On Wednesday, COVID-19 Response Coordinator Jeff Zients stepped in front of cameras at a White House briefing to say that the administration is going to be sending out 25 million free masks and making them available to Americans who may have some difficulty in finding this basic item of personal safety.

The masks will be “high quality” washable multilayer masks that meet the current CDC recommendations. The White House will distribute these masks to more than 1,300 community health centers and over 60,000 community food pantries beginning in March.

"Masks are widely available in many different shapes and sizes,” said Zients, “but many low-income Americans still lack affordable access to this basic protection. That's why we're taking this important action to keep Americans safe … These masks will be made in America, and will not impact availability of masks for health care workers." The estimate is that this action may provide masks to as many as 15 million Americans who currently don’t have masks, or don’t have a mask that meets CDC guidelines.

Johnson & Johnson vaccine meets experts on Friday

Johnson & Johnson’s COVID-19 vaccine was submitted to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for a potential emergency use authorization (EUA) at the end of January. Since then, experts both inside and outside the agency have been reviewing the data, looking for evidence of effectiveness as well as reviewing any concerns over safety.

On Friday, the FDA’s panel of outside experts will get a final presentation from Johnson & Johnson scientists, following that up with a discussion session. At the end of that session, they’ll have a vote on whether to recommend the drug to the FDA. The votes in favor of both Pfizer and Moderna’s vaccine were overwhelming (though not without drama as last-minute concerns over age limits on Pfizer’s vaccine brought the whole process to a temporary halt). Based on the available data, Johnson & Johnson’s vaccine is likely to be just as enthusiastically approved, but … it’s not a sure thing. After all, the experts are privy to more information that has been covered in public so far, and the efficacy of Johnson & Johnson’s offering has been rated in a different way—one that looks at moderate and severe cases rather than the overall rate of infection—from other vaccines.

In any case the hearing should be informative, and Daily Kos will be listening in. If the expert panel gives this vaccine the thumbs up, the FDA can be expected to authorize its use within a few days. That could mean a third vaccine starts to roll out as soon as next week. That’s good. And considering that this is a single-shot vaccine with very reasonable storage requirements, it’s even better.

Enough vaccine for herd immunity by spring

As Bloomberg reports, Johnson & Johnson says they are prepared to ship 4 million doses immediately following FDA authorizing an EUA, and another 16 million doses in March. At the same time, both Pfizer and Moderna have increased their rate of production.

As of Wednesday, the CDC reports that 82 million vaccinations have been delivered, and 65 million have been administered. 44.5 million Americans have received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine. That’s 17% of the population over 18 years of age.

But by the end of March, manufacturers expect to have delivered enough vaccine to treat 130 million Americans. Which would be over half of the adult population. That’s the kind of number that would begin to have an impact on the spread of the virus, and places the nation on the way to the idea of “herd immunity by April.” In fact, add in the over 10% of the adult population that has already tested positive for COVID-19 at this point, and herd immunity might even be achieved by the first of April. 

If the vaccine production is maintained as expected, by early summer every adult in the United States should have at least been offered a COVID-19 vaccine. Though that doesn’t mean they will have taken it.

California variant carries worrisome mutations

But before the nation starts to celebrate the end of the pandemic—and certainly before anyone thinks of taking off their mask—there are some reasons for concern. While most talk of variants has been focused on the fast-spreading strain from the U.K. or the vaccine-evading viruses from South Africa or Brazil, it turns out one of the worst might be found right in the United States.

As The Los Angeles Times reports, a variant that emerged in California last year already appears to pack a number of changes to the critical “spike protein” that may make it more contagious, more virulent, and more evasive for vaccines.

This variant, called B.1.427/B.1.429, appears to be connected with the huge surge of cases that hit California beginning in November. That surge led to an increased rate of both hospitalizations and deaths, showing a strong association between this new variant—now approaching 90% of the infections in that state—and bad outcomes.

It also appears that this variant is more evasive of antibodies produced by past infection or vaccine. However, California has not experienced a large number of people becoming reinfected, so it’s apparently not that evasive. There is also every reason to believe that while vaccines may be less effective against this variant, they will remain highly effective.

A big concern is that this California variant could mingle some genes with the U.K., South Africa, and Brazil variants to produce a new strain that combines the worst qualities of all three. The best way to avoid this: wear a mask, keep social distancing, and keep increasing vaccination rates. Since California has seen a 70% drop in new cases since the beginning of January, it seems to be working for the Golden State.

Predictions from the past

One year ago today, I stopped simply laying out the progress of the then just-named COVID-19 and ventured into the land of speculation.

Today’s the day that I’m going to do what I’ve held off doing from the start—look at the possible range of effects from an unchecked global COVID-19 pandemic. … 

So what does all this really mean? What follows is a back-of-the envelope analysis of “How bad could COVID-19 really be?" It's going to be long. It's going to be grim. If you don’t want to take that ride, please check out now. It’s a lovely, globally warmed winter day in much of the United States. Plus, there are puppies. Go and find them. But if you're sticking around, here we go. … Because it means that the number of deaths from COVID-19 in the United States alone would be (deep breath) 450,000 to 900,000.

If that makes it seem like I was all too accurate in my assessment … nope. Because here’s what I said next.

Now that I've cranked up the panic-o-meter to 12, let me dial it back several notches: This is not going to happen. It's simply not. Governments are moving to prevent the kind of unchecked pandemic that was seen in 1918. And they've gotten much better at this. Every effort is being made to slow the spread of the disease, to isolate outbreaks, and to prevent general exposure. Even in Wuhan, where the infection began, the case count appears to be less than 1% of the population. Actions can be extremely effective.

All of the assessments of the situation from a year ago seem pitifully uninformed and sadly optimistic. We’ve all learned a lot in the last year. Not much of it good.

What a difference a month makes.  What a difference a president makes.

Wednesday, February 24, 2021

Biden nominees who aren't white men are mysteriously facing tough confirmation fights

Go figure. For some reason, the Biden nominees facing the toughest confirmation fights are women of color. And it’s not just Republicans—conservative Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin more or less tanked Neera Tanden’s nomination to head the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), and is publicly hesitating about Rep. Deb Haaland’s nomination for secretary of the interior. 

Tanden, who is Indian American, would be the first woman of color to head OMB. Haaland, who is an enrolled citizen of the Laguna Pueblo, would be the first American Indian Cabinet secretary. These are the nominees Manchin has chosen to in the first case oppose and in the second case let it be known he has “remaining questions” and is undecided.

About all that.

Manchin also voted to confirm misogynist Twitter troll Richard Grenell as ambassador to Germany under Donald Trump. He now claims he can’t vote for Tanden because of her mean tweets. A mean Tanden tweet involved things like calling Sen. Susan Collins “the worst” or saying that vampires have “more heart” than Flyin’ Ted Cruz. A Grenell tweet involved comparing Rachel Maddow’s appearance to Justin Bieber and telling her to “take a breath and put on a necklace,” or describing Michelle Obama “sweating on the East Room carpet.”

It’s not just Manchin, of course. One single Republican could step up and Tanden would be confirmed, but the same Republicans who spent four years pretending not to have read Trump’s tweets and voted to confirm Sessions and Grenell and Kavanaugh are suddenly upset about Tanden’s tweets. In fact, Sen. Mitt Romney, who is very troubled about Tanden’s tweets, had Grenell as a top aide on his 2012 campaign.

No one is accusing Haaland of mean tweets. Rather, Republican Sens. John Barrasso and Steve Daines have vowed to hold up her confirmation over her “radical” views like wanting to slow global climate change—she’s said one of her policy goals is to “keep fossil fuels in the ground.” Barrasso and Daines are very upset about that, but of course their insistence on painting Haaland as radical isn’t simply about policy. As former Sens. Mark Udall and Tom Udall wrote in a USA Today op-ed, “Were either of us the nominee to lead the Interior Department, we doubt that anyone would be threatening to hold up the nomination or wage a scorched earth campaign warning about ‘radical’ ideas.”

The Udalls are, of course, white men.

Rep. Haaland’s nomination is both historic and long overdue,” they continued. “If confirmed, she would be the first Native American Cabinet member. Her record is in line with mainstream conservation priorities. Thus, the exceptional criticism of Rep. Haaland and the threatened holds on her nomination must be motivated by something other than her record.”

Republicans can drag Haaland’s confirmation process out, throwing up roadblocks and additional procedural votes, though ultimately, if every Democrat supports her, they can’t stop it entirely. (That, of course, is where Manchin comes in.)

There’s a pattern here even beyond Haaland and Tanden. Of President Biden’s nominees to be confirmed to date, the closest vote was for Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, the first Latino and first immigrant in that role. Republicans are also threatening to hold up the nomination of Health and Human Services (HHS) nominee Xavier Becerra, the current California attorney general and a former House member. Becerra would be the first Latino to lead HHS. Republicans, after confirming non-doctor Alex Azar to be HHS secretary under Trump, say that not being a doctor means Becerra isn’t qualified. 

The list goes on. Outside right-wing groups are launching attacks on Vanita Gupta’s nomination for associate attorney general. Democrats are concerned that Kristen Clarke, nominated to head the civil rights division of the Department of Justice, will face opposition. Gupta is Indian American. Clarke is Black.

”It’s been incredibly disturbing to see a pattern or a trend emerging where people of color and women seem to be at the bottom of the list in terms of hearings and getting their confirmations finalized,” Janet MurguĂ­a of UnidosUS told Politico. “It’s highly offensive to see this foot-dragging going on when we have such an incredible need to put these different leaders in place in these different agencies.”

And it has to be recognized for what it is. Republicans and Manchin alike can claim that race and gender play no role in who they find themselves comfortable with or concerned about, or in who they feel safe opposing. But their actions will tell the tale.

Just a few of the old white male Republican senators.  Wait, where's Cancun Cruz?  Oh, that's right he's off playing with his phone during a senate hearing on the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol.

Tuesday, February 23, 2021

Texas Freeze Shows a Chilling Truth - How the Rich Use Climate Change to Divide the Rest of Us

This is a story about Texas millionaires screwing the 99 percent by reversing the message in this banner to "PROFITS before People."

Former Clinton labor secretary Robert Reich. (photo: Steve Russell/Toronto Star)
Former Clinton labor secretary Robert Reich. (photo: Steve Russell/Toronto Star)

By Robert Reich, Guardian UK

23 February 21

The Lone Star State is aptly named. If you’re not part of the Republican oil elite with Cruz and Abbott, you’re on your own

exas has long represented a wild west individualism that elevates personal freedom – this week, the freedom to freeze – above all else.

The state’s prevailing social Darwinism was expressed most succinctly by the mayor of Colorado City, who accused his constituents – trapped in near sub-zero temperatures and complaining about lack of heat, electricity and drinkable water – of being the “lazy” products of a “socialist government”, adding “I’m sick and tired of people looking for a damn handout!” and predicting “only the strong will survive and the weak will perish”.

Texas has the third-highest number of billionaires in America, most of them oil tycoons. Last week, the laissez-faire state energy market delivered a bonanza to oil and gas producers that managed to keep production going during the freeze. It was “like hitting the jackpot”, boasted the president of Comstock Resources on an earnings call. Jerry Jones, billionaire owner of the Dallas Cowboys, holds a majority of Comstock’s shares.

But most other Texans were marooned. Some did perish.

The Electric Reliability Council of Texas, which manages the flow of electric power, exempted affluent downtowns from outages, leaving thriving parts of Austin, Dallas and Houston brightly lit while pushing less affluent precincts into the dark and cold.

Like the poor across America and much of the world, poor Texans are getting hammered by climate change. Many inhabit substandard homes, lacking proper insulation. The very poor occupy trailers or tents, or camp out in their cars. Lower-income communities are located close to refineries and other industrial sites that release added pollutants when they shut or restart.

In Texas, for-profit energy companies have no incentive to prepare for extreme weather or maintain spare capacity. Even if they’re able to handle surges in demand, prices go through the roof and poorer households are hit hard. If they can’t pay, they’re cut off.

Rich Texans take spikes in energy prices in their stride. If the electric grid goes down, private generators kick in. In a pinch – as last week – they check into hotels or leave town. On Wednesday night, as millions of his constituents remained without power and heat, Senator Ted Cruz flew to CancĂşn, Mexico for a family vacation. Their Houston home was “FREEZING” – as his wife put it.

Climate change, Covid-19 and jobs are together splitting Americans by class more profoundly than Americans are split by politics. The white working class is taking as much of a beating as most Black and Latino people.

Yet the white working class has been seduced by conservative Republicans and Trump cultists, of which Texas has an abundance, into believing that what’s good for Black and Latino people is bad for them, and that whites are, or should be, on the winning side of the social Darwinian contest.

White grievance helps keep Republicans in power, protecting their rich patrons from a majority that might otherwise join to demand what they need – such as heat, electricity, water and reliable sources of power.

Lower-income Texans, white as well as Black and Latino, are taking it on the chin in many other ways. Texas is one of the few states that hasn’t expanded Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act, leaving the share of Texans without health insurance twice the national average, the largest uninsured population of any state. Texas has double the national average of children in poverty and a higher rate of unemployment than the nation’s average.

And although Texans have suffered multiple natural disasters stemming from climate change, Texas Republicans are dead set against a Green New Deal that would help reduce the horrific impacts.

Last Wednesday, Texas’s governor, Greg Abbott, went on Fox News to proclaim, absurdly, that what happened to his state “shows how the Green New Deal would be a deadly deal for the United States”. Abbott blamed the power failure on the fact that “wind and solar got shut down”.

Rubbish. The loss of power from frozen coal-fired and natural gas plants was six times larger than the dent caused by frozen wind turbines. Texans froze because deregulation and a profit-driven free market created an electric grid utterly unprepared for climate change.

In Texas, oil tycoons are the only winners from climate change. Everyone else is losing badly. Adapting to extreme weather is necessary but it’s no substitute for cutting emissions, which Texas is loath to do. Not even the Lone Star state should protect the freedom to freeze.

Did you catch the shot of Ted Cruz playing on his phone during the Senate hearings on the Capitol assault today (Feb. 23).  The guy just doesn't get it on so many levels.

 

Cartoon: Bonfire of the Vanities

As a Texan, this topic hits pretty close to home. the windmill redd herring is absolute nonsense.

Please consider supporting my work on Patreon or on Ko-Fi so I can continue creating it.

Also, please sign up for my free editorial cartooning newsletter.

Monday, February 22, 2021

Democrats have now replaced Republicans as the party of national security

(L-R ) Congresswomen Sheila Jackson Lee, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Sylvia Garcia help distribute food at the Houston Food Bank on February 20, 2021 in Houston, Texas. - Texans are in need of aid after an unprecedented and deadly "polar plunge" burst pipes and left millions in the US state shivering without power or clean water for days. (Photo by Elizabeth Conley / POOL / AFP) (Photo by ELIZABETH CONLEY/POOL/AFP via Getty Images)
Reps. Sheila Jackson Lee, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and Sylvia Garcia pack food boxes for Houston residents in the wake of the power crisis

Near the end of his rambling, 75-minute long 2016 "Mourning in America" speech, then-candidate Donald Trump took a break from pitting minorities against one another and declaring the United States was beyond saving to do his best impression of a broken clock and make one salient point. "The most basic duty of government is to defend the lives of its own citizens," he graveled monotonously, "(and) any government that fails to do so is a government unworthy to lead."

Well, he wasn't wrong, for once. But, contrary to the GOP's opinion, national security means more than writing a blank check to the military-industrial complex, and spending trillions of dollars on boondoggles like a $14 billion aircraft carrier that can't launch aircraft, the costliest weapons program in history, the development of a gun that's too expensive to actually fire, or spending $6.4 trillion on the longest war in American history.

But even that notation is overly generous, so let's just be absolutely clear here: Donald Trump and the modern Republican party have no actual interest in national security. Absolutely none whatsoever. Unlike what most people associate with "authoritarianism" and "nationalism," Donald Trump didn't (and still doesn't!) care about America or its power any further than he could personally benefit. And as the GOP has become the party of Trump, it has followed suit, with leadership more concerned about performative virtue signaling in the pursuit of profit and power and no interest whatsoever in governing or making America "great."

True to form, Republicans are using one of Karl Rove's key strategies and accusing their opponents of their own weaknesses.

Sadly and predictably, too many of us feel the need to play this game by their rules, seemingly unable or unwilling to see that the Republican Party is a game of Calvinball masquerading as a political party.

Unless we want to concede American democracy to a generation of fascism, we need to stop fighting battles on the Republicans' terms; reframing the national security debate is a key component to that.

We don't even have to wonder what reframing the national security debate might hypothetically look like. Instead, we just need take a glance down to the great state of Texas. A once-in-a-century weather event—the kind that seem to be happening annually, multiple years in a row—has left the state devastated. Combined with an unholy blend of corruption, a total lack of investment in infrastructure, and a complete lack of leadership, the winter storms have become a ghastly tornado of failure that might’ve even given Donald Trump a run for his money.

HOUSTON, TEXAS - FEBRUARY 20: U.S. Rep. Al Green (L) (D-TX) prepares to load a case of water into a car during a water distribution event at the Fountain Life Center on February 20, 2021 in Houston, Texas. Much of Texas is still struggling with historic cold weather, power outages and a shortage of potable water after winter storm Uri swept across 26 states with a mix of freezing temperatures and precipitation. Many Houston residents do not have drinkable water at their homes and are relying on city water giveaways. (Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)
Democratic Rep. Al Green of Texas hands out water to constituents in the wake of the power crisis

And, again, I use the term “leadership” lightly; as everyday Texans are asked to freeze and go without electricity in order to keep the lights on for corporate America, what passes for "leaders" in Texas have shown they are completely unconcerned about anything but blaming anyone and anything else for what's going on.

But this is a perfect example for why Democrats have to seize the mantle of national security. National security means that we provide for the people of the United States, and keep their lives as stable as possible. But it doesn’t mean trillions in defense spending; instead, it means focusing on keeping kids in school, not bars and college football games.

National security means not forcing hospitals to bid against one another to buy critical PPE for their workers on the black market from an adversarial country, even better, preventing that problem from happening in the first place. It means not having your entire life ruined if you get sick.

National security means not tolerating extremism and terrorism, and working as a country to ensure we root it out proactively.

It means ensuring that we are energy independent as a nation, and that Americans can get reliable power to homes, schools, and workplaces without interruption.

National security means that, when the very worst does happen, the people who keep us safe in emergencies will be properly equipped and ready to take on that fight, instead of being left to hold the line for a government that refuses to care for its own people.

There is no better time than now. How many people do you know ache to go back to "normal", talking about their plans for "when the pandemic is over"? They want that stability. They yearn for it. But the problem is that that stability is simply not possible, and will never be possible, under Republican leadership.

We have to take this issue of national security, and its framing, and shove it directly back down the GOP’s throat. Because the threats are not going away; in fact, a whole mess of them are gonna get way worse. And the Republican Party is unable and unwilling to do anything about it.

Democrats must seize this unprecedented opportunity and prove to the American people that we still stand up to make their lives, and our nation, as secure as they can possibly be.


President Musk Wants to Pay for His Tax Cuts With Your Social Security and Medicare

  Smirking President Elon Musk (left). Billionaire Sidekick Vivek Ramaswamy (right). (photo: Andrew Harnik/Getty) ...